Hu Shao-Hua, Lai Jian-Bo, Xu Dong-Rong, Qi Hong-Li, Peterson Bradley S, Bao Ai-Min, Hu Chan-Chan, Huang Man-Li, Chen Jing-Kai, Wei Ning, Hu Jian-Bo, Li Shu-Lan, Zhou Wei-Hua, Xu Wei-Juan, Xu Yi
Department of Psychiatry, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
The Key Laboratory of Mental Disorder's Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 27;6:30537. doi: 10.1038/srep30537.
The clinical and cognitive responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in bipolar II depressed patients remain unclear. In this study, thirty-eight bipolar II depressed patients were randomly assigned into three groups: (i) left high-frequency (n = 12), (ii) right low-frequency (n = 13), (iii) sham stimulation (n = 13), and underwent four-week rTMS with quetiapine concomitantly. Clinical efficacy was evaluated at baseline and weekly intervals using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Cognitive functioning was assessed before and after the study with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop Word-Color Interference Test (Stroop), and Trail Making Test (TMT). Thirty-five patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, the mean scores of both the HDRS-17 and the MADRS significantly decreased over the 4-week trial, which did not differ among the three groups. Exploratory analyses revealed no differences in factor scores of HDRS-17s, or in response or remission rates. Scores of WCST, Stroop, or TMT did not differ across the three groups. These findings indicated active rTMS combined with quetiapine was not superior to quetiapine monotherapy in improving depressive symptoms or cognitive performance in patients with bipolar II depression.
双相II型抑郁患者对重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的临床和认知反应仍不明确。在本研究中,38例双相II型抑郁患者被随机分为三组:(i)左侧高频组(n = 12),(ii)右侧低频组(n = 13),(iii)假刺激组(n = 13),并同时接受为期四周的rTMS联合喹硫平治疗。使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS - 17)和蒙哥马利 - 阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)在基线和每周进行临床疗效评估。在研究前后使用威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)、斯特鲁普字色干扰测试(Stroop)和连线测验(TMT)评估认知功能。最终分析纳入35例患者。总体而言,在为期4周的试验中,HDRS - 17和MADRS的平均得分均显著下降,三组之间无差异。探索性分析显示,HDRS - 17的因子得分、反应率或缓解率无差异。三组的WCST、Stroop或TMT得分无差异。这些发现表明,在改善双相II型抑郁患者的抑郁症状或认知表现方面,rTMS联合喹硫平并不优于喹硫平单药治疗。