Suppr超能文献

比较美国和斯堪的纳维亚使用《年龄与阶段问卷》的情况:系统评价。

Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, PeaceHealth Medical Group, Eugene, OR, USA.

National Research Centre for Disadvantaged Children and Youth, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Apr;61(4):419-430. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14044. Epub 2018 Sep 23.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities.

METHOD

The review was performed for ASQ- and ASQ:SE-related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988-2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis.

RESULTS

US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at-risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician-referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental-behavioural differences in intervention/exposure-based cohorts. Pre-visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same-day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental-behavioural specialist is beneficial.

INTERPRETATION

Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's 'overall' sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up-to-date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

General and at-risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre-visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE 'overall' sections are not quantifiable and under-researched.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在调查美国和斯堪的纳维亚地区使用《年龄与阶段问卷》(ASQ)和《年龄与阶段问卷:社会情感》(ASQ:SE)进行筛查的实践情况,并确定实际经验和研究机会。

方法

对从出生到 5 岁的儿童与 ASQ 和 ASQ:SE 相关的研究进行了综述。从九个数据库和 1689 篇参考文献(1988 年至 2018 年发表)中,共纳入了 127 篇文章,并使用 Covidence 在线软件进行分类。在进行数据综合之前,使用了关键评估技能计划清单进行评估。

结果

美国的研究主要使用 ASQ/ASQ:SE 来检测一般人群和医疗环境中高危人群的发育迟缓情况,从而提高早期检测、临床医生转介和干预的比例。斯堪的纳维亚的研究通常使用 ASQ/ASQ:SE 来监测干预/暴露队列中发育行为的差异。预访筛查的完成/返回率为 83%至 90%以上,并促进当天解释。当需要转介时,进行全系统的护理协调或与发育行为专家的协作是有益的。

解释

审查了实际实施的经验教训。研究机会包括调查和衡量 ASQ/ASQ:SE 的“整体”部分。丹麦、挪威和瑞典语的翻译已经可用,但整个斯堪的纳维亚地区都需要进行最新的标准化和验证研究。需要进行随机对照试验来调查筛查组和未筛查组的结果。

本文增加的内容

广泛的一般人群和高危人群从定期的《年龄与阶段问卷》(ASQ)和/或《年龄与阶段问卷:社会情感》(ASQ:SE)筛查中受益。预访 ASQ 和/或 ASQ:SE 筛查实施系统效果最佳。ASQ 和 ASQ:SE 的“整体”部分不可量化,研究不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验