Department of Pediatrics, PeaceHealth Medical Group, Eugene, OR, USA.
National Research Centre for Disadvantaged Children and Youth, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Apr;61(4):419-430. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14044. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities.
The review was performed for ASQ- and ASQ:SE-related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988-2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis.
US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at-risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician-referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental-behavioural differences in intervention/exposure-based cohorts. Pre-visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same-day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental-behavioural specialist is beneficial.
Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's 'overall' sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up-to-date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts.
General and at-risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre-visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE 'overall' sections are not quantifiable and under-researched.
本系统评价旨在调查美国和斯堪的纳维亚地区使用《年龄与阶段问卷》(ASQ)和《年龄与阶段问卷:社会情感》(ASQ:SE)进行筛查的实践情况,并确定实际经验和研究机会。
对从出生到 5 岁的儿童与 ASQ 和 ASQ:SE 相关的研究进行了综述。从九个数据库和 1689 篇参考文献(1988 年至 2018 年发表)中,共纳入了 127 篇文章,并使用 Covidence 在线软件进行分类。在进行数据综合之前,使用了关键评估技能计划清单进行评估。
美国的研究主要使用 ASQ/ASQ:SE 来检测一般人群和医疗环境中高危人群的发育迟缓情况,从而提高早期检测、临床医生转介和干预的比例。斯堪的纳维亚的研究通常使用 ASQ/ASQ:SE 来监测干预/暴露队列中发育行为的差异。预访筛查的完成/返回率为 83%至 90%以上,并促进当天解释。当需要转介时,进行全系统的护理协调或与发育行为专家的协作是有益的。
审查了实际实施的经验教训。研究机会包括调查和衡量 ASQ/ASQ:SE 的“整体”部分。丹麦、挪威和瑞典语的翻译已经可用,但整个斯堪的纳维亚地区都需要进行最新的标准化和验证研究。需要进行随机对照试验来调查筛查组和未筛查组的结果。
广泛的一般人群和高危人群从定期的《年龄与阶段问卷》(ASQ)和/或《年龄与阶段问卷:社会情感》(ASQ:SE)筛查中受益。预访 ASQ 和/或 ASQ:SE 筛查实施系统效果最佳。ASQ 和 ASQ:SE 的“整体”部分不可量化,研究不足。