• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发育筛查问卷对识别后期有认知或教育困难儿童的预测效度:一项系统评价

Predictive Validity of Developmental Screening Questionnaires for Identifying Children With Later Cognitive or Educational Difficulties: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Schonhaut Luisa, Maturana Andres, Cepeda Olenkha, Serón Pamela

机构信息

Departamento de Pediatría, Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.

Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 24;9:698549. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.698549. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2021.698549
PMID:34900855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8651980/
Abstract

Parent/caregiver completing developmental screening questionnaires (DSQs) for children before 5 years of age is currently recommended. The DSQs recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) are the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ), Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS), and the Survey of Well-being of Young Children (SWYC). Nevertheless, their predictive validity has not been well-established. To assess in the current literature, the value of AAP-recommended DSQs (ASQ, PEDS, SWYC) administered between 0 and 5 years of age, for predicting long-term cognitive achievement and/or school performance (CA/SP), after 1 year or more of evaluation and at/or after age 5 years, in the general population. Cochrane, MEDLINE PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scielo, and Scopus databases (until March 2021). Two authors selected the studies. Forward and backward citation follow-up was done; authors of DSQ were contacted to identify additional studies. Cohorts were identified, and authors of selected studies were contacted to corroborate and complete extracted data. Thirty-two publications, corresponding to 10 cohorts, were included. All cohorts used ASQ. Only cohort using PEDS was identified but did not meet the inclusion criteria. No cohorts conducted with SWYC were identified. Associations between ASQ and CA/SP were extracted for eight cohorts. The odds ratios were >3, and the area under the curve was 0.66-0.87. A trade-off between sensitivity and specificity was observed. Heterogeneity in population characteristics and in DSQ adaptations. A positive association between ASQ and later CA/SP was found in different social, cultural, and economic settings. Additional studies are necessary to determine the impact factors in the predictive capacity of DSQs. PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020183883.

摘要

目前建议家长/照料者为5岁以下儿童填写发育筛查问卷(DSQ)。美国儿科学会(AAP)推荐的DSQ包括《年龄与发育阶段问卷》(ASQ)、《家长发育状况评估》(PEDS)和《幼儿幸福感调查》(SWYC)。然而,它们的预测效度尚未得到充分确立。为了在当前文献中评估AAP推荐的DSQ(ASQ、PEDS、SWYC)在0至5岁之间使用时,对一般人群在评估1年或更长时间后以及5岁及/或5岁以后预测长期认知成就和/或学业表现(CA/SP)的价值。检索Cochrane、MEDLINE PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scielo和Scopus数据库(截至2021年3月)。两名作者筛选研究。进行了向前和向后的引文跟踪;联系了DSQ的作者以确定其他研究。确定了队列研究,并联系了所选研究的作者以核实和完善提取的数据。纳入了32篇出版物,对应10个队列。所有队列都使用了ASQ。仅确定了使用PEDS的一个队列,但不符合纳入标准。未确定使用SWYC进行的队列研究。提取了八个队列中ASQ与CA/SP之间的关联。优势比>3,曲线下面积为0.66 - 0.87。观察到敏感性和特异性之间的权衡。人群特征和DSQ改编存在异质性。在不同的社会、文化和经济背景下,发现ASQ与后期CA/SP之间存在正相关。需要进一步的研究来确定影响DSQ预测能力的因素。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库,标识符:CRD42020183883。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9809/8651980/f83ede34fd32/fped-09-698549-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9809/8651980/a79b288c32d8/fped-09-698549-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9809/8651980/85e554a13562/fped-09-698549-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9809/8651980/f83ede34fd32/fped-09-698549-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9809/8651980/a79b288c32d8/fped-09-698549-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9809/8651980/85e554a13562/fped-09-698549-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9809/8651980/f83ede34fd32/fped-09-698549-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive Validity of Developmental Screening Questionnaires for Identifying Children With Later Cognitive or Educational Difficulties: A Systematic Review.发育筛查问卷对识别后期有认知或教育困难儿童的预测效度:一项系统评价
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 24;9:698549. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.698549. eCollection 2021.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.发育筛查问卷的比较准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):366-374. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6000.
4
Comparison of the ASQ and PEDS in screening for developmental delay in children presenting for primary care.比较 ASQ 与 PEDS 在初级保健就诊儿童发育迟缓筛查中的应用。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 Sep;32(7):499-511. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31822552e9.
5
PEDS and ASQ developmental screening tests may not identify the same children.儿科发育筛查测试(PEDS)和年龄与发育进程问卷(ASQ)可能无法识别出相同的儿童。
Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):e640-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2628. Epub 2009 Sep 7.
6
The predictive value of universal preschool developmental assessment in identifying children with later educational difficulties: A systematic review.普及性学前发展评估对识别日后存在教育困难儿童的预测价值:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247299. eCollection 2021.
7
Utility of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to Identify Developmental Delay in Children Aged 12 to 60 Months: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.年龄与阶段问卷在识别 12 至 60 月龄儿童发育迟缓中的效用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Oct 1;176(10):980-989. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3079.
8
Comparison of the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status and Ages and Stages Questionnaire Developmental Screening Tests in a Eurasian Country.欧亚国家中父母对发展状况的评价与年龄和阶段问卷发育筛查测试的比较。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;42(6):450-456. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000912.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Predictive value of the parent-completed ASQ for school difficulties in preterm-born children <35 weeks' GA at five years of age.五岁时,父母完成的《年龄与发育进程问卷》(ASQ)对孕龄小于35周的早产儿童学业困难的预测价值。
Neonatology. 2014;106(4):311-6. doi: 10.1159/000363216. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening for developmental delay at 18 months using the Infant Toddler Checklist: A validation study.使用婴幼儿检查表在18个月时筛查发育迟缓:一项验证性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0326751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326751. eCollection 2025.
2
Early child development in England: cross-sectional analysis of ASQ-3 records from the 2-2½-year universal health visiting review using national administrative data (Community Service Dataset, CSDS).英格兰的幼儿发展:利用国家行政数据(社区服务数据集,CSDS)对2至2.5岁儿童普遍健康访视复查中的ASQ-3记录进行横断面分析。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2025 Feb 27;9(2):2459. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i2.2459. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) Worldwide: A Scoping Review.《全球范围内的年龄与阶段问卷(ASQ)的翻译与文化调适:范围综述》
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1;42(6):490-501. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000940.
2
The predictive value of universal preschool developmental assessment in identifying children with later educational difficulties: A systematic review.普及性学前发展评估对识别日后存在教育困难儿童的预测价值:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247299. eCollection 2021.
3
Six-Year Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Children With Single-Ventricle Physiology.
Recent challenges in children's developmental milestones.
儿童发育里程碑方面的近期挑战。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Dec 16. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03781-5.
4
The relationship between the ages and stages questionnaire, 3rd edition scores in early childhood and future cognitive abilities in young Nepalese children.《年龄与阶段问卷》第三版评分与尼泊尔幼儿未来认知能力的关系。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05112-3.
5
Clinical utility and psychometric properties of tools for early detection of developmental concerns and disability in young children: A scoping review.幼儿发育问题和残疾早期检测工具的临床效用及心理测量特性:一项范围综述
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Mar;67(3):286-306. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16076. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Effects of a Prenatal Anxiety Randomized Controlled Trial Intervention on Infant Development in Pakistan.巴基斯坦一项产前焦虑随机对照试验干预对婴儿发育的影响。
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Jan-Feb;25(1):102551. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.07.018. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
7
Implementing neurodevelopmental follow-up care for children with congenital heart disease: A scoping review with evidence mapping.实施先天性心脏病患儿神经发育随访护理:基于证据图谱的范围综述
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Feb;66(2):161-175. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15698. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
8
ASQ-3 and BSID-III's concurrent validity and predictive ability of cognitive outcome at 5 years.ASQ-3 和 BSID-III 在 5 岁时认知结果的同时效度和预测能力。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Oct;94(4):1465-1471. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02528-y. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
9
Predictive validity of the Infant Toddler Checklist in primary care at the 18-month visit and developmental diagnosis at 3-5 years: a prospective cohort study.在 18 个月就诊时和在 3-5 岁时进行发育诊断时,初级保健中婴儿-幼儿检查表的预测效度:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Jun;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001524.
单心室生理学患儿的 6 年神经发育结局。
Pediatrics. 2021 Feb;147(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-014589. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Predictive value of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire® for school performance and school intervention in late preterm- and term-born children.《年龄与阶段问卷》对晚期早产儿和足月出生儿童学业表现和学校干预的预测价值。
Child Care Health Dev. 2021 Jan;47(1):103-111. doi: 10.1111/cch.12814. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
Provider Responses to Positive Developmental Screening: Disparities in Referral Practices?提供者对积极发展筛查的反应:转诊实践中的差异?
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2021 Jan 1;42(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000855.
6
Predicting Literacy Skills at 8 Years From Preschool Language Trajectories: A Population-Based Cohort Study.从学前语言轨迹预测8岁时的读写能力:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Aug 10;63(8):2752-2762. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00286. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Predictive validity in middle childhood of short tests of early childhood development used in large scale studies compared to the Bayley-III, the Family Care Indicators, height-for-age, and stunting: A longitudinal study in Bogota, Colombia.在哥伦比亚波哥大进行的一项纵向研究中,与贝利 III 量表、家庭关怀指标、身高年龄比和发育迟缓相比,在大规模研究中用于评估幼儿早期发展的短期测试在儿童中期的预测效度。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0231317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231317. eCollection 2020.
8
Trends in Pediatricians' Developmental Screening: 2002-2016.儿科医生发育筛查趋势:2002-2016 年。
Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0851. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
9
Environmental pollutants affecting children's growth and development: Collective results from the MOCEH study, a multi-centric prospective birth cohort in Korea.影响儿童生长发育的环境污染物:韩国多中心前瞻性出生队列研究(MOCEH)的综合结果
Environ Int. 2020 Apr;137:105547. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105547. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.发育筛查问卷的比较准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):366-374. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6000.