Reling Timothy T, Becker Sarah, Drakeford Leah, Valasik Matthew
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):NP5496-NP5520. doi: 10.1177/0886260518801021. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
The present study systematically assesses the influence of hookup culture endorsement on the acceptance of female rape myths (i.e., false, stereotypical, or prejudicial beliefs regarding sexual assault involving survivors) and male rape myths (i.e., false, stereotypical, or prejudicial beliefs about sexual assault involving survivors). Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to assess the primary hypotheses that a particular form of hookup culture endorsement (i.e., the belief that hookups elevate an individual's social status) would act as the primary predictor of male and female rape myth acceptance among a sample of 376 U.S. college students. As with prior research, a complex relationship emerged for both male and female rape mythology in which acceptance increases or decreases based upon the form of hookup culture endorsement examined, as the endorsement of beliefs reflecting heterosexual power dynamics (e.g., harmlessness and status attainment) functioned as positive predictors of rape myth acceptance, while beliefs challenging such assumptions (e.g., sexual freedom) served to decrease rape myth acceptance. Results supported the primary hypotheses that beliefs concerning hookups and status attainment would be the largest predictor of male rape myth acceptance and female rape myth acceptance. Consistent with prior research, the predictive power of gender and religiosity was initially significant across both male and female rape myth acceptance yet diminished when controlling for levels of hookup culture endorsement. Furthermore, analyses indicated gender differences among the influences of hookup culture endorsement for , as even though beliefs concerning status served as an aggravating factor for female rape myth acceptance, beliefs concerning sexual freedom served as a mitigating factor for women only.
本研究系统评估了对一夜情文化的认同对接受女性强奸谬见(即关于涉及幸存者的性侵犯的错误、刻板或偏见性信念)和男性强奸谬见(即关于涉及幸存者的性侵犯的错误、刻板或偏见性信念)的影响。进行了多元回归分析,以评估主要假设,即在376名美国大学生样本中,一种特定形式的一夜情文化认同(即认为一夜情能提升个人社会地位的信念)将成为接受男性和女性强奸谬见的主要预测因素。与先前的研究一样,男性和女性强奸神话都呈现出一种复杂的关系,即根据所考察的一夜情文化认同形式,接受程度会增加或减少,因为反映异性权力动态的信念认同(如无害性和地位获得)是强奸谬见接受度的正向预测因素,而挑战此类假设的信念(如性自由)则会降低强奸谬见接受度。结果支持了主要假设,即关于一夜情和地位获得的信念将是男性强奸谬见接受度和女性强奸谬见接受度的最大预测因素。与先前的研究一致,性别和宗教信仰的预测力在男性和女性强奸谬见接受度方面最初都很显著,但在控制一夜情文化认同水平后会减弱。此外,分析表明一夜情文化认同的影响存在性别差异,因为尽管关于地位的信念是女性强奸谬见接受度的加重因素,但关于性自由的信念仅对女性起到缓解作用。