• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对强奸谬见的认同与性行为之间的关系。

The Relationship Between Rape Myth Acceptance and Sexual Behaviors.

作者信息

Fansher Ashley K, Zedaker Sara B

机构信息

Avila University, Kansas City, MO, USA.

University of Houston-Victoria, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jan;37(1-2):NP903-NP924. doi: 10.1177/0886260520916831. Epub 2020 May 13.

DOI:10.1177/0886260520916831
PMID:32401140
Abstract

An extensive amount of research has been devoted to understanding rape myths, especially in the context of sexual attitudes. Few studies have examined sexual actions as a correlate of rape myth acceptance (RMA). As such, this study utilizes the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (IRMA) and its four distinct subscales to examine adherence to rape myths and an individual's view of sex and sexuality in a sample of 1,310 college students. The IRMA was included in its entirety and separated into its four subscales: "She asked for it," "He didn't mean to," "It wasn't really rape," and "She lied." Results indicated that the most impactful variables for all four subscales were adversarial heterosexual beliefs, stereotypical gender beliefs, and being male. The main implications of this study pertain to implementation of programming. Intervention programming should focus on younger males due to their increased adherence to certain rape myths. Furthermore, programs that address not only rape myths but also other traditional and negative belief systems should be employed. Results of this study lend support to the supposition that it is not necessarily individual characteristics that have a large effect on RMA but is instead a strong adherence to traditional belief systems.

摘要

大量研究致力于理解强奸谬见,尤其是在性态度的背景下。很少有研究将性行为作为接受强奸谬见(RMA)的一个相关因素进行考察。因此,本研究利用更新后的伊利诺伊州强奸谬见接受量表(IRMA)及其四个不同的子量表,在1310名大学生样本中考察对强奸谬见的坚持程度以及个体对性与性行为的看法。IRMA被完整纳入并分为四个子量表:“她自找的”、“他不是故意的”、“这不算真正的强奸”以及“她撒谎了”。结果表明,对所有四个子量表影响最大的变量是敌对的异性恋信念、刻板的性别信念以及男性身份。本研究的主要意义在于项目实施方面。干预项目应关注年轻男性,因为他们对某些强奸谬见的坚持程度更高。此外,应采用不仅涉及强奸谬见而且还涉及其他传统负面信念体系的项目。本研究结果支持这样一种假设,即对RMA影响较大的不一定是个体特征,而是对传统信念体系的强烈坚持。

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between Rape Myth Acceptance and Sexual Behaviors.对强奸谬见的认同与性行为之间的关系。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jan;37(1-2):NP903-NP924. doi: 10.1177/0886260520916831. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
Rape Myth Acceptance in a Community Sample of Adult Women in the Post #MeToo Era.# 后 #MeToo 时代社区成年女性群体中的强奸谬论接受度研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8211-8234. doi: 10.1177/08862605231153893. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
3
Exploring the Influence of Hookup Culture on Female and Male Rape Myths.探究一夜情文化对男女强奸谬见的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):NP5496-NP5520. doi: 10.1177/0886260518801021. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
4
Rape myth acceptance among students attending a historically black college (HBCU): implications for intervention design.就读于历史悠久的黑人大学(HBCU)的学生对强奸谬见的认同:对干预设计的启示
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Feb-Mar;71(2):528-534. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1898402. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Rape Myth Acceptance Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Mostly Heterosexual College Students.性同意观念在男女同校大学生中的接受情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):NP232-NP262. doi: 10.1177/0886260517733282. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
Chinese University Students' Attitudes Toward Rape Myth Acceptance: The Role of Gender, Sexual Stereotypes, and Adversarial Sexual Beliefs.中国大学生对强奸谬见认同的态度:性别、性刻板印象及敌对性性观念的作用
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):2467-2486. doi: 10.1177/0886260520938507. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
7
Changes in Rape Myth Acceptance Among Undergraduates: 2010 to 2017.强奸谬论接受度在大学生群体中的变化:2010 年至 2017 年。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):9371-9392. doi: 10.1177/0886260519867153. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
8
Assessing Rape Myth Acceptance: A Contribution to Italian Validation of the Measure for Assessing Subtle Rape Myth (SRMA-IT).评估强奸谬论接受度:对评估微妙强奸谬论测量表(SRMA-IT)意大利语验证的贡献。
Sex Abuse. 2022 Jun;34(4):375-397. doi: 10.1177/10790632211028158. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
9
"Men Cannot Be Raped": Correlates of Male Rape Myth Acceptance.“男性不能被强奸”:男性强奸谬论接受的相关因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):6391-6417. doi: 10.1177/0886260518817777. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
10
Predicting Bystander Intention to Intervene: The Role of Gender-Specific System Justification and Rape Myth Acceptance for Men and Women.预测旁观者的干预意图:特定性别的系统正当化以及男性和女性对强奸谬论的接受程度所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00326. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Rape Myths, Gender Roles, and Perceptions of Sexuality: Differences Among Ultra-Orthodox, Formerly Ultra-Orthodox, and Secular Jewish Women.强奸谬见、性别角色与性观念:极端正统派、曾经的极端正统派与世俗犹太女性之间的差异
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2025 Aug;69(10-11):1560-1576. doi: 10.1177/0306624X251329514. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
Development of the Vietnamese Rape Myths Acceptance Scales: A Web-Based Survey of Young Adults.越南强奸神话接受量表的编制:一项针对青年成年人的网络调查。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul;53(7):2629-2652. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02893-7. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Predictors of Rape Myth Acceptance Among South Asian Students in Canada.
加拿大南亚裔学生中接受强奸谬见的预测因素。
Violence Against Women. 2025 Mar;31(3-4):960-980. doi: 10.1177/10778012231222487. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Measuring Electronically Shared Rape Myths: Scale Creation and Correlates.衡量电子传播的强奸谬见:量表编制及其相关因素
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jan;39(1-2):369-392. doi: 10.1177/08862605231197140. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
5
Masculinity Threats Sequentially Arouse Public Discomfort, Anger, and Positive Attitudes Toward Sexual Violence.男性气质威胁会依次引发公众的不适感、愤怒以及对性暴力的积极态度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jan;51(1):96-109. doi: 10.1177/01461672231179431. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
6
Rape Myth Acceptance in a Community Sample of Adult Women in the Post #MeToo Era.# 后 #MeToo 时代社区成年女性群体中的强奸谬论接受度研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8211-8234. doi: 10.1177/08862605231153893. Epub 2023 Feb 18.