Suppr超能文献

门诊单节段颈椎间盘置换术的安全性:一项倾向评分匹配的多机构研究。

Safety of Outpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Multi-institutional Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 May 1;44(9):E530-E538. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002884.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort comparison study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative adverse event profile of cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) performed as an outpatient relative to inpatient procedure.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent reimbursement changes and a push for safe reductions in hospital stay have resulted in increased interest in performing CTDRs in the outpatient setting. However, there has been a paucity of studies investigating the safety of outpatient CTDR procedures, despite increasing frequency.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single-level CTDR were identified in the 2005 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Outpatient versus inpatient procedure status was defined by length of stay, with outpatient being less than 1 day. Patient baseline characteristics and comorbidities were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matched comparisons were then performed for 30-day perioperative complications and readmissions between the two cohorts. In addition, perioperative outcomes of outpatient single-level CTDR versus matched outpatient single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) cases were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 373 outpatient and 1612 inpatient single-level CTDR procedures were identified. After propensity score matching was performed to control for potential confounders, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in perioperative complications between outpatient versus matched inpatient CTDR. Notably, the rate of readmissions was not different between the two groups. In addition, there was no difference in rates of perioperative adverse events between outpatient single-level CTDR versus matched outpatient single-level ACDF.

CONCLUSION

The perioperative outcomes evaluated in the current study support the conclusion that, for appropriately selected patients, single-level CTDR can be safely performed in the outpatient setting without increased rates of 30-day perioperative complications or readmissions compared with inpatient CTDR or outpatient single-level ACDF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列比较研究。

目的

本研究旨在调查颈椎间盘置换术(CTDR)作为门诊手术与住院手术的围手术期不良事件概况。

背景资料总结

最近的报销政策变化以及对减少住院时间的安全性的推动,使得在门诊环境下进行 CTDR 的兴趣增加。然而,尽管越来越频繁地进行门诊 CTDR 手术,但缺乏研究调查门诊 CTDR 手术的安全性。

方法

在 2005 年至 2016 年全国手术质量改进计划数据库中确定了接受单节段 CTDR 的患者。通过住院时间定义门诊与住院手术状态,门诊手术时间少于 1 天。比较两组患者的基线特征和合并症。然后对两组患者的 30 天围手术期并发症和再入院进行倾向评分匹配比较。此外,还比较了门诊单节段 CTDR 与匹配的门诊单节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)病例的围手术期结果。

结果

共确定了 373 例门诊和 1612 例住院单节段 CTDR 手术。在进行倾向评分匹配以控制潜在混杂因素后,统计分析显示门诊与匹配的住院 CTDR 之间的围手术期并发症无显著差异。值得注意的是,两组的再入院率无差异。此外,门诊单节段 CTDR 与匹配的门诊单节段 ACDF 之间的围手术期不良事件发生率无差异。

结论

当前研究评估的围手术期结果支持以下结论,对于适当选择的患者,与住院 CTDR 或门诊单节段 ACDF 相比,单节段 CTDR 可安全地在门诊环境下进行,而不会增加 30 天围手术期并发症或再入院率。

证据水平

3 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验