Suppr超能文献

“对话的一部分”:一项定性研究,探讨肿瘤学医疗保健专业人员在整合补充医学的标准化评估和记录方面的经验。

"Part of the Conversation": A Qualitative Study of Oncology Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Integrating Standardized Assessment and Documentation of Complementary Medicine.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Integr Cancer Ther. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15347354221077229. doi: 10.1177/15347354221077229.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of complementary medicine (CM) among individuals with cancer is common, however, it is infrequently assessed or documented by oncology healthcare professionals (HCPs). A study implementing standardized assessment and documentation of CM was conducted at a provincial cancer agency. The purpose of this study was to understand the perspectives and experience of oncology HCPs who took part in the study, as well as withdrew, regarding the feasibility and the challenges associated with assessment and documentation of CM use.

METHODS

An interpretive descriptive study methodology was used. A total of 20 HCPs who participated, managed staff, or withdrew from the study were interviewed. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic, inductive analysis was used to code and analyse themes from the data.

RESULTS

Oncology HCPs who participated in the study felt that CM use was common among patients and recognized it went underreported and was poorly documented. Facilitating factors for the implementation of standardized assessment and documentation of CM use included having a standard assessment form, embedding assessment within existing screening processes, and leveraging self-report by patients. Barriers included limited time, perceived lack of knowledge regarding CM, hesitancy to engage patients in discussion about CM, and lack of institutional support and resources. Recommendations for future implementation included having explicit policies related to addressing CM at point-of-care, leveraging existing electronic patient reporting systems, including the electronic health record, and developing information resources and training for HCPs.

CONCLUSIONS

With the high prevalence of CM use among individuals with cancer, oncology HCPs perceive addressing CM use to be feasible and an essential part of high-quality, person-centered cancer care. Institutional and professional challenges, however, must be overcome to support the assessment, documentation and discussion of CM in patient-HCP consultations.

摘要

简介

在癌症患者中,使用补充医学(CM)很常见,但肿瘤学医护人员(HCPs)很少对其进行评估或记录。在一家省级癌症机构进行了一项实施 CM 标准化评估和记录的研究。本研究的目的是了解参与研究以及退出研究的肿瘤学 HCPs 对评估和记录 CM 使用的可行性和相关挑战的看法和经验。

方法

采用解释性描述研究方法。共采访了 20 名参与、管理员工或退出研究的 HCPs。采访进行了录音,并逐字转录。使用主题、归纳分析对数据进行编码和分析主题。

结果

参与研究的肿瘤学 HCPs 认为患者中 CM 的使用很普遍,并且认识到 CM 的报告不足且记录不佳。CM 使用标准化评估和记录实施的促进因素包括使用标准评估表、将评估纳入现有筛查流程,以及利用患者的自我报告。障碍包括时间有限、对 CM 的知识缺乏、不愿与患者讨论 CM、以及缺乏机构支持和资源。未来实施的建议包括制定与在医疗点解决 CM 相关的明确政策、利用现有的电子患者报告系统,包括电子病历,以及为 HCPs 开发信息资源和培训。

结论

鉴于癌症患者中 CM 的高使用率,肿瘤学 HCPs 认为解决 CM 的使用是可行的,并且是高质量、以患者为中心的癌症护理的重要组成部分。然而,必须克服机构和专业方面的挑战,以支持在医患咨询中对 CM 进行评估、记录和讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验