Suppr超能文献

回应艾伦(2018):关于反应性依恋障碍的一致和分歧点。

Response to Allen (2018): Points of agreement and disagreement on reactive attachment disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Dec;83:190-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Abstract

Reactive attachment disorder (RAD) is a very rare, understudied, and controversial disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities (RIDD) recently published our research study, "Reactive attachment/disinhibited social engagement disorders: Callous-unemotional traits and comorbidity" (Mayes, Waschbusch, Calhoun, Breaux, & Baweja, 2017) investigating comorbidity in children with RAD and demonstrating a high prevalence of conduct disorder and callous-unemotional traits, consistent with previous research. Allen (2018) responded with a paper published in RIDD criticizing our study and offering his points of view. In our response to Allen, which follows, we discuss areas where we agree with Allen, as well as areas of disagreement, all presented within the context of scientific research. A point we assume we all agree on is the importance of continued empirical research to advance our knowledge and understanding of RAD.

摘要

反应性依恋障碍(RAD)是一种非常罕见、研究不足且存在争议的障碍。《发育障碍研究》(RIDD)最近发表了我们的研究论文,“反应性依恋/去抑制性社会参与障碍:无情无感情特质和共病”(Mayes、Waschbusch、Calhoun、Breaux 和 Baweja,2017 年),调查了 RAD 儿童的共病情况,并表明存在较高的品行障碍和无情无感情特质,与先前的研究一致。Allen(2018 年)发表了一篇在 RIDD 上的论文作为回应,批评了我们的研究并提出了他的观点。在我们对 Allen 的回应中,我们讨论了我们同意 Allen 的观点以及我们存在分歧的领域,所有这些都在科学研究的背景下呈现。我们假设大家都同意的一个观点是,继续进行实证研究对于提高我们对 RAD 的认识和理解非常重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验