• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估科威特医院网站,以提高消费者参与度和获取健康信息的能力:一项横断面分析研究。

Evaluating hospital websites in Kuwait to improve consumer engagement and access to health information: a cross-sectional analytical study.

机构信息

Department of Information Science, College of Computing Sciences and Engineering, Kuwait University, Adailiya, Kuwait.

Health Informatics Unit, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Sharq, Kuwait.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0660-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-018-0660-4
PMID:30249244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6154923/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current advances in information and communication technology have made accessing and obtaining health-related information easier than ever before. Today, many hospital websites use a patient-centric approach to promote engagement and encourage learning for better health-related decision making. However, little is known about the current state of hospital websites in the State of Kuwait. This study aims to evaluate hospital websites in Kuwait and offer recommendations to improve patient engagement and access to health information.

METHODS

This study employs a cross-sectional analytical approach to evaluate hospital websites in Kuwait in 2017. The websites of hospitals that provide in-patient services were identified through a structured search. Only active websites that were available in either English or Arabic were considered. The evaluation of the websites involved a combination of automated and expert- based evaluation methods and was performed across four dimensions: Accessibility, Usability, Presence, and Content.

RESULTS

Nine hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Most of the websites fell short in all four dimensions. None of the websites passed the accessibility guidelines. The usability of websites varied between hospitals. Overall, the majority of hospitals in Kuwait have rudimentary online presence and their websites require careful reassessment with respect to design, content, and user experience. The websites focus primarily on promoting services provided by the hospital rather than engaging and communicating with patients or providing evidence-based information.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare organization and website developers should follow best-practices to improve their websites taking into consideration the quality, readability, objectivity, coverage and currency of the information as well as the design of their websites. Hospitals should leverage social media to gain outreach and better engagement with consumers. The websites should be offered in additional languages commonly spoken by people living in Kuwait. Efforts should be made to ensure that health information on hospital websites are evidence-based and checked by healthcare professionals.

摘要

背景

当前信息和通信技术的进步使得获取健康相关信息变得前所未有的便捷。如今,许多医院网站采用以患者为中心的方法来促进参与度,鼓励学习,以做出更好的健康相关决策。然而,目前对于科威特医院网站的现状却知之甚少。本研究旨在评估科威特医院网站,并提供建议以改善患者参与度和获取健康信息的途径。

方法

本研究采用横断面分析方法,于 2017 年评估科威特的医院网站。通过结构化搜索确定提供住院服务的医院的网站。仅考虑处于活动状态且提供英文或阿拉伯文版本的网站。对网站的评估结合了自动化和专家评估方法,并从四个维度进行:可访问性、可用性、存在度和内容。

结果

符合纳入标准的医院有 9 家。大多数网站在所有四个维度上都表现不佳。没有一个网站符合可访问性准则。网站的可用性在医院之间存在差异。总体而言,科威特的大多数医院都具有基本的在线存在,其网站在设计、内容和用户体验方面需要仔细重新评估。这些网站主要侧重于宣传医院提供的服务,而不是与患者互动和沟通,或提供基于证据的信息。

结论

医疗保健组织和网站开发人员应遵循最佳实践,改进其网站,考虑信息的质量、可读性、客观性、涵盖范围和时效性,以及网站的设计。医院应利用社交媒体扩大覆盖面并更好地与消费者互动。网站应提供科威特居民常用的其他语言版本。应努力确保医院网站上的健康信息基于证据,并由医疗保健专业人员进行检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6300/6154923/51e75be4fd06/12911_2018_660_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6300/6154923/51e75be4fd06/12911_2018_660_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6300/6154923/51e75be4fd06/12911_2018_660_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating hospital websites in Kuwait to improve consumer engagement and access to health information: a cross-sectional analytical study.评估科威特医院网站,以提高消费者参与度和获取健康信息的能力:一项横断面分析研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0660-4.
2
Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality.评估针对阿拉伯语使用者的乳腺癌网站:对知名度、可用性、可及性、可读性和质量的实证调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 9;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01868-9.
3
An Evaluation and Ranking of Children's Hospital Websites in the United States.美国儿童医院网站的评估与排名
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 22;18(8):e228. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5799.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Hospital website rankings in the United States: expanding benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement.美国医院网站排名:拓展有效吸引消费者的基准和标准。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 25;16(2):e64. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3054.
6
An examination of the content of diabetes websites targeting Arabic speakers.针对讲阿拉伯语人群的糖尿病网站内容研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Nov;179:105242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105242. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Assessment of hospitals' websites in Portugal.葡萄牙医院网站评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;10:995153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.995153. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of User-Oriented Information Services on the Websites of Large Hospitals in China and the United States: Cross-sectional Study.中美大型医院网站用户导向型信息服务比较:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 29;23(12):e27392. doi: 10.2196/27392.
9
Effective US health system websites: establishing benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement.有效的美国卫生系统网站:为有效的消费者参与建立基准和标准。
J Healthc Manag. 2012 Jan-Feb;57(1):47-64; discussion 64-5.
10
Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making?网络上的前列腺癌——患者决策的便捷工具?
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):135-140. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0891-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of hospitals' websites in Portugal.葡萄牙医院网站评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 26;10:995153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.995153. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality.评估针对阿拉伯语使用者的乳腺癌网站:对知名度、可用性、可及性、可读性和质量的实证调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 9;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01868-9.
3
Comparison of User-Oriented Information Services on the Websites of Large Hospitals in China and the United States: Cross-sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Health status and health systems financing in the MENA region: roadmap to universal health coverage.中东和北非地区的健康状况与卫生系统筹资:实现全民健康覆盖的路线图。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Sep 4;2:25. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0044-9. eCollection 2017.
2
Health Care in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities.海湾合作委员会国家的医疗保健:挑战与机遇综述
Cureus. 2017 Aug 21;9(8):e1586. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1586.
3
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.
中美大型医院网站用户导向型信息服务比较:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 29;23(12):e27392. doi: 10.2196/27392.
4
Availability and readability of online patient information on clubfoot: assessment of paediatric hospital clubfoot web pages.在线马蹄内翻足患者信息的可获取性与可读性:儿科医院马蹄内翻足网页评估
J Child Orthop. 2021 Jun 1;15(3):291-297. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210013.
5
Social media use for public health promotion in the Gulf Cooperation Council. An overview.社交媒体在海湾合作委员会公共卫生促进中的应用。概述。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Jan;42(1):9-20. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.1.25470.
6
Internet Published Policies Regarding Liver Transplant Eligibility and Substance Use in United States Transplant Centers.美国移植中心关于肝移植资格和药物使用的互联网发布政策。
Hepatol Commun. 2020 Sep 7;4(11):1717-1724. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1591. eCollection 2020 Nov.
充血性心力衰竭在线患者教育材料的可读性评估
Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9780317. doi: 10.1155/2017/9780317. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Seeking Health Information Online.
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 May 1;171(5):500. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3109.
5
Creating a culture of health: evolving healthcare systems and patient engagement.营造健康文化:不断发展的医疗体系与患者参与度
QJM. 2017 Mar 1;110(3):125-129. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw188.
6
An Evaluation and Ranking of Children's Hospital Websites in the United States.美国儿童医院网站的评估与排名
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 22;18(8):e228. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5799.
7
Comparison of good clinical practice compliance and readability ease of the informed consents between observational and interventional clinical studies in the Emirates.阿联酋观察性和干预性临床研究中知情同意书的良好临床实践合规性与易读性比较
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):123-7. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184815.
8
Behavioral Health Information Technology: From Chaos To Clarity.行为健康信息技术:从混乱到清晰
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jun 1;35(6):1106-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0013.
9
Quality of Public Hospitals Websites: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study in Iran.公立医院网站质量:伊朗的一项横断面分析研究
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Apr;24(2):130-3. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.130-133. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
10
Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines.对通过印度主要搜索引擎识别出的健康信息网站的质量和可读性评估。
Adv Prev Med. 2016;2016:4815285. doi: 10.1155/2016/4815285. Epub 2016 Mar 28.