• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线马蹄内翻足患者信息的可获取性与可读性:儿科医院马蹄内翻足网页评估

Availability and readability of online patient information on clubfoot: assessment of paediatric hospital clubfoot web pages.

作者信息

Xie Michael, Young Jason, May Collin

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Harvard Combined Orthopedic Residency Program, Boston, -Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Child Orthop. 2021 Jun 1;15(3):291-297. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210013.

DOI:10.1302/1863-2548.15.210013
PMID:34211606
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8223082/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the availability and readability of online patient information (OPI) provided by paediatric hospitals in the United States using clubfoot as a model condition.

METHODS

The websites of the top 95 paediatric hospitals identified using US News & World Report were included. The names of paediatric hospitals and the terms "clubfoot", "clubfeet" and "talipes equinovarus" were entered into the Google search engine. Readability was assessed using five validated metrics and the composite grade level (CGL). The number of unpaid monthly visits was calculated with the Ahrefs Organic Traffic Score (OTS) tool. Data for paediatric hospitals were compared with the same metrics for the top ten Google search results.

RESULTS

Of 95 paediatric hospitals, 29 (30.5%) did not have at least one web page dedicated to clubfoot. The 128 web pages representing 66 paediatric hospitals had an average CGL of 9.4, representing a readability level requiring some high school education. The mean OTS for all paediatric hospitals was 116 estimated visits per month, which was significantly less than that for the top ten Google clubfoot search results (3035.1; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Paediatric hospital web pages on clubfoot were visited much less frequently than those from the top ten Google search results. Only two web pages (1.6%) from paediatric hospitals offered OPI on clubfoot that met the American Medical Association recommended reading level (sixth-grade level). Paediatric hospitals should create OPI on clubfoot with appropriate readability and accessibility for patient families.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

摘要

目的

以马蹄内翻足作为典型病症,确定美国儿科学医院提供的在线患者信息(OPI)的可用性和可读性。

方法

纳入了通过《美国新闻与世界报道》确定的排名前95的儿科学医院的网站。将儿科学医院的名称以及“马蹄内翻足”“双侧马蹄内翻足”和“先天性马蹄内翻足”等术语输入谷歌搜索引擎。使用五个经过验证的指标和综合年级水平(CGL)评估可读性。使用Ahrefs自然流量评分(OTS)工具计算每月的无付费访问量。将儿科学医院的数据与谷歌搜索结果排名前十的相同指标进行比较。

结果

在95家儿科学医院中,有29家(30.5%)没有至少一个专门针对马蹄内翻足的网页。代表66家儿科学医院的128个网页的平均CGL为9.4,这意味着其可读性水平需要一定的高中教育程度。所有儿科学医院的平均OTS为每月116次估计访问量,这明显低于谷歌马蹄内翻足搜索结果排名前十的访问量(3035.1;p<0.0001)。

结论

儿科学医院关于马蹄内翻足的网页访问频率远低于谷歌搜索结果排名前十的网页。儿科学医院中只有两个网页(1.6%)提供了符合美国医学协会推荐阅读水平(六年级水平)的关于马蹄内翻足的OPI。儿科学医院应创建可读性和可访问性适宜的关于马蹄内翻足的OPI,以满足患者家庭的需求。

证据水平

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/9bd5fa3c9881/jco-15-291-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/6ab829a728e3/jco-15-291-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/457c9c665962/jco-15-291-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/2b4f93281e9e/jco-15-291-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/3bb546fb0a21/jco-15-291-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/9bd5fa3c9881/jco-15-291-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/6ab829a728e3/jco-15-291-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/457c9c665962/jco-15-291-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/2b4f93281e9e/jco-15-291-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/3bb546fb0a21/jco-15-291-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7c8/8223082/9bd5fa3c9881/jco-15-291-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Availability and readability of online patient information on clubfoot: assessment of paediatric hospital clubfoot web pages.在线马蹄内翻足患者信息的可获取性与可读性:儿科医院马蹄内翻足网页评估
J Child Orthop. 2021 Jun 1;15(3):291-297. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210013.
2
Availability and Readability of Online Patient Information on Osteosarcoma: Assessment of Pediatric Hospital and National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center (NCIDCC) Osteosarcoma Web Pages.骨肉瘤在线患者信息的可获取性与可读性:儿科医院及国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心(NCIDCC)骨肉瘤网页评估
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Aug 19;5(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00054. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
3
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
A Readability Analysis of Online Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis Patient Resources Among Pediatric Hospital Web Pages: A US-Based Study.基于美国的研究:对小儿科医院网页中在线脊柱滑脱和峡部裂患者资源的可读性分析
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Nov 15;7(11). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00177. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.
5
Online Patient Education Materials on Iron Deficiency Anemia Are Too Difficult to Read and Low Quality: A Readability and Quality Analysis.关于缺铁性贫血的在线患者教育材料阅读难度太大且质量低下:一项可读性与质量分析。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 12;15(10):e46902. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46902. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.对谷歌搜索查询及在线妇科肿瘤患者教育材料可读性的系统评估
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):435-440. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1319-z.
7
Readability of Online Patient Educational Resources Found on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Web Sites.国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心网站上在线患者教育资源的可读性
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jun;14(6):735-40. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0075.
8
Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.互联网上以患者为导向的甲氨蝶呤信息网站:完整性、准确性、格式、可靠性、可信度和可读性综述
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):41-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080430.
9
Trends, Quality, and Readability of Online Health Resources on Proton Radiation Therapy.质子放射治疗相关在线健康资源的趋势、质量和可读性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 May 1;107(1):33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.043. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Readability of online patient educational materials for common orthopaedic paediatric conditions within Australasia.澳大拉西亚常见骨科儿科疾病在线患者教育材料的可读性。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2667-2671. doi: 10.1111/ans.17960. Epub 2022 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Availability and Readability of Multilingual Online Patient Materials for Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease.关于Legg-Calve-Perthes病的多语言在线患者资料的可获取性与可读性
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2025 Mar 6;11:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100169. eCollection 2025 May.
2
A Readability Analysis of Online Spondylolisthesis and Spondylolysis Patient Resources Among Pediatric Hospital Web Pages: A US-Based Study.基于美国的研究:对小儿科医院网页中在线脊柱滑脱和峡部裂患者资源的可读性分析
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Nov 15;7(11). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00177. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Availability and Readability of Online Patient Information on Osteosarcoma: Assessment of Pediatric Hospital and National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center (NCIDCC) Osteosarcoma Web Pages.骨肉瘤在线患者信息的可获取性与可读性:儿科医院及国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心(NCIDCC)骨肉瘤网页评估
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Aug 19;5(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00054. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
2
Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information.影响在线健康信息质量和可靠性的因素。
Digit Health. 2020 Aug 30;6:2055207620948996. doi: 10.1177/2055207620948996. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
3
Evaluating hospital websites in Kuwait to improve consumer engagement and access to health information: a cross-sectional analytical study.
评估科威特医院网站,以提高消费者参与度和获取健康信息的能力:一项横断面分析研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0660-4.
4
Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review.在线健康信息的可读性:一项元叙事系统评价
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):487-492. doi: 10.1177/1062860617751639. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
5
Internet Health Information Seeking and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Systematic Review.互联网健康信息搜索与医患关系:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 19;19(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5729.
6
Where people look for online health information.人们在哪里寻找在线健康信息。
Health Info Libr J. 2017 Jun;34(2):146-155. doi: 10.1111/hir.12143. Epub 2016 May 21.
7
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
8
Orthopaedic Patient Information on the World Wide Web: An Essential Review.骨科患者在万维网上的信息:一项必不可少的综述。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Feb 17;98(4):325-38. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01189.
9
Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.低健康素养与在线健康信息评估:文献系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 7;17(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4018.
10
Risks of imbalanced information on US hospital websites.美国医院网站上信息失衡的风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):441-3. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7400.