• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的医疗保健首选供应商选择方法。

A new approach to preferred provider selection in health care.

机构信息

Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):300-305. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.007
PMID:30249448
Abstract

In January 2015 Zilveren Kruis, the largest health insurer in The Netherlands, engaged in a new three-year, unlimited volume contract with five carefully selected providers of cataract surgery. Zilveren Kruis used a novel method, designed to identify the top expert providers in a certain discipline. This procedure for provider selection uses the principles of Best Value Procurement (BVP), and puts the provider in charge of defining key performance indicators for health care quality. The procedure empowers the professional and acknowledges that the provider, not the purchaser, is the true expert in defining what is high quality care. This new approach focuses purely on provider selection and is thus complementary to innovations in health care reimbursement, such as value-based hospital purchasing or outcome-based financing. We describe this novel approach to preferred provider selection and show how it makes affordable quality the core topic in negotiations with providers.

摘要

2015 年 1 月,荷兰最大的健康保险公司 Zilveren Kruis 与五家精心挑选的白内障手术供应商签订了一项为期三年、不限数量的新合同。Zilveren Kruis 使用了一种新颖的方法,旨在确定特定学科的顶级专家供应商。这种供应商选择程序采用了最佳价值采购(BVP)的原则,并赋予供应商定义医疗质量关键绩效指标的权力。该程序赋予了专业人员权力,并承认供应商是真正的专家,能够定义高质量的医疗服务。这种新方法纯粹专注于供应商选择,因此与医疗保健报销方面的创新是互补的,如基于价值的医院采购或基于结果的融资。我们描述了这种新的首选供应商选择方法,并展示了它如何使可负担的质量成为与供应商谈判的核心主题。

相似文献

1
A new approach to preferred provider selection in health care.一种新的医疗保健首选供应商选择方法。
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):300-305. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
2
Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?利用免赔额进行患者分流:优先医疗机构的患者数量增加了吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jun;17(5):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0711-z. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
3
The British health care reforms, the American health care revolution, and purchaser/provider contracts.英国医疗保健改革、美国医疗保健革命与购买者/提供者合同。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Winter;20(4):885-908. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-4-885.
4
Value-based cost sharing in the United States and elsewhere can increase patients' use of high-value goods and services.在美国和其他国家,基于价值的费用分担可以增加患者对高价值商品和服务的使用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):704-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0964.
5
The Challenges of Hospital Contracting in the Era of Value-Based Purchasing.基于价值采购时代的医院合同签订挑战
MD Advis. 2020 Summer;13(3):17-19.
6
Financial risk allocation and provider incentives in hospital-insurer contracts in The Netherlands.荷兰医院-保险公司合同中的财务风险分配和提供者激励。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Feb;24(1):125-138. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01459-5. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
Preferred providers and the credible commitment problem in health insurance: first experiences with the implementation of managed competition in the Dutch health care system.优先提供者与医疗保险中的可信承诺问题:荷兰医疗体系中实施管理竞争的初步经验。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2011 Apr;6(2):219-35. doi: 10.1017/S1744133110000320. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
8
Measuring Active Purchasing in Healthcare: Analysing Reallocations of Funds Between Providers to Evaluate Purchasing Systems Performance in the Netherlands.衡量医疗保健领域的主动采购:分析供应商之间的资金重新分配以评估荷兰采购系统的绩效。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7506. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7506. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
9
Purchaser-provider splits in health care-the case of Finland.医疗保健中的购买方-供应方分离——以芬兰为例。
Health Policy. 2013 Aug;111(3):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
Consumer channeling by health insurers: natural experiments with preferred providers in the Dutch pharmacy market.健康保险公司的消费者引导:荷兰药房市场中与首选供应商的自然实验。
Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):299-316. doi: 10.1002/hec.1265.

引用本文的文献

1
Citizen engagement in healthcare procurement decision-making by healthcare insurers: recent experiences in the Netherlands.医疗保险公司参与医疗保健采购决策:荷兰的最新经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00939-7.
2
Understanding the use of patient-reported data by health care insurers: A scoping review.理解医疗保险公司对患者报告数据的使用:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244546. eCollection 2020.
3
Power and Purchasing: Why Strategic Purchasing Fails.
权力与采购:战略采购为何失败。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):975-1020. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12471. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Pay less and spend more-the real value in healthcare procurement.花更少的钱,获得更多价值——医疗保健采购中的真正价值。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Nov;7(22):688. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.93.