• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中的购买方-供应方分离——以芬兰为例。

Purchaser-provider splits in health care-the case of Finland.

机构信息

University of Tampere, School of Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences FI-33014 University of Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2013 Aug;111(3):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.012
PMID:23790264
Abstract

The purchaser-provider split (PPS) is a service delivery model in which third-party payers are kept organizationally separate from service providers. The operations of the providers are managed by contracts. One of the main aims of PPS is to create competition between providers. Competition and other incentive structures built into the contractual relationship are believed to lead to improvements in service delivery, such as improved cost containment, greater efficiency, organizational flexibility, better quality and improved responsiveness of services to patient needs. PPS was launched in Finland in the early 1990s but was not widely implemented until the early 2000s. Compared to other countries with PPS the development and implementation of PPS in Finland has been unusual. Firstly, purchasing is implemented at the level of municipalities, which means that the size of the Finnish purchasers is extremely small. Elsewhere purchasing is mostly implemented at the regional or national levels. Secondly, PPS is also applied to primary health care and A&E services while in other countries the services mainly include specialized health care and residential care for the elderly. Thirdly, PPS in health and social services is not regulated by any specific legislation, regulative mechanisms or guidelines. Instead it is regulated within the same framework as public procurement in general.

摘要

购买方-提供方分离(PPS)是一种服务提供模式,其中第三方付款人与服务提供者在组织上是分开的。提供者的运营由合同管理。PPS 的主要目标之一是在提供者之间创造竞争。竞争和合同关系中建立的其他激励结构被认为会导致服务提供的改进,例如更好的成本控制、更高的效率、组织灵活性、更好的质量以及更好地满足患者需求的服务响应能力。PPS 于 20 世纪 90 年代初在芬兰推出,但直到 21 世纪初才得到广泛实施。与其他实行 PPS 的国家相比,芬兰在发展和实施 PPS 方面的情况较为特殊。首先,购买方在市级层面实施,这意味着芬兰购买方的规模非常小。其他地方的购买方大多在地区或国家层面实施。其次,PPS 也适用于初级保健和急症服务,而在其他国家,这些服务主要包括专门的医疗保健和老年人的居住护理。第三,卫生和社会服务中的 PPS 不受任何特定立法、监管机制或准则的监管。相反,它是在与一般公共采购相同的框架内进行监管的。

相似文献

1
Purchaser-provider splits in health care-the case of Finland.医疗保健中的购买方-供应方分离——以芬兰为例。
Health Policy. 2013 Aug;111(3):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
2
The purchaser-provider split: implications for dental services.购买者与提供者分离:对牙科服务的影响。
N Z Dent J. 1992 Oct;88(394):121-5.
3
Selected key issues in the development and drafting of public managed behavioral health care carve-out contracts.公共管理行为健康护理分拆合同制定与起草中的关键问题选析
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Dec(3):1-13.
4
Purchasing health services abroad: practices of cross-border contracting and patient mobility in six European countries.境外购买医疗服务:六个欧洲国家跨境签约和患者流动的实践。
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.016. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
5
The experience of purchaser-provider split in the implementation of family physician and rural health insurance in Iran: an institutional approach.伊朗家庭医生与农村医疗保险实施过程中采购方与服务提供方分离的经验:一种制度视角
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Dec;30(10):1261-71. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu135. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
6
The impact of contracting-out on health system performance: a conceptual framework.外包对卫生系统绩效的影响:一个概念框架。
Health Policy. 2007 Jul;82(2):200-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
7
The procurement of NHS dental services--a guide.国民保健制度牙科服务的采购——指南
Br Dent J. 2009 May 23;206(10):535-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.415.
8
The purchaser-provider split in New Zealand: the story so far.新西兰的购买方与供应方分离:迄今为止的情况。
Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(1):43-60.
9
Purchaser strategies to influence quality of care: from rhetoric to global applications.购买者影响医疗质量的策略:从言辞到全球应用
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Jun;15(3):171-3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014373.
10
Contracts in the real world: case studies from Southern Africa.现实世界中的合同:来自南部非洲的案例研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jun;60(11):2505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.030.

引用本文的文献

1
From pilot to national roll-out of the improved Community Health Fund (iCHF) in Tanzania: lessons learnt and way forward.从坦桑尼亚试点到改进型社区卫生基金(iCHF)的全国推广:经验教训与未来方向。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Nov 12;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00571-y.
2
Unspoken expectations and situational participation: a qualitative study exploring the instantiation of next of kin involvement within the trust model.心照不宣的期望和情境参与:一项探索在信托模式下近亲参与实例化的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 30;24(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11338-9.
3
Assessment of strategic healthcare purchasing and financial autonomy in Tanzania: the case of results-based financing and health basket fund.
坦桑尼亚战略性医疗采购和财务自主权评估:以基于成果的融资和医疗篮子基金为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;11:1260236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1260236. eCollection 2023.
4
Trust-based service innovation of municipal home care: a longitudinal mixed methods study.基于信任的城市家庭护理服务创新:一项纵向混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 15;22(1):1250. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08651-6.
5
Healthcare financing in Egypt: a systematic literature review.埃及的医疗保健融资:一项系统的文献综述。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2022 Jan 7;97(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s42506-021-00089-8.
6
Factors affecting health services strategic purchasing for breast cancer patients: a mixed study in Iran.影响乳腺癌患者医疗服务战略采购的因素:伊朗的一项混合研究
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Oct 18;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00324-1.
7
The roles of health maintenance organizations in the implementation of a social health insurance scheme in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria: a mixed-method investigation.尼日利亚东南部埃努古实施社会健康保险计划中健康维护组织的作用:混合方法研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Mar 12;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-1146-4.
8
Barriers and opportunities to improve the foundations for high-quality healthcare in the Mexican Health System.改善墨西哥医疗体系高质量医疗基础的障碍和机遇。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Dec 1;33(10):1073-1082. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy098.
9
Stakeholder analysis of Iran's health insurance system.伊朗医疗保险系统的利益相关者分析。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Oct 29;7:135. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_69_18. eCollection 2018.
10
A critical analysis of health care purchasing arrangements in Kenya: A case study of the county departments of health.肯尼亚医疗保健采购安排的批判性分析:以县卫生部门为例
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):1159-1177. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2604. Epub 2018 Aug 3.