Flynn Eadaoin, Smith Christina H, Walsh Cathal D, Walshe Margaret
Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 South Leinster Street, 2 Dublin, Ireland.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 24;9(9):CD011077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011077.pub2.
People with dementia can have feeding and swallowing difficulties (dysphagia). Modification of the consistency of food or fluids, or both, is a common management strategy. However, diet modification can affect quality of life and may lead to dehydration and malnutrition. Evidence on the benefits and risks of modifying food and fluids is mandatory to improve the care of people with dementia and dysphagia.
To determine the effectiveness and adverse effects associated with modifying the consistency of food and fluids in improving oral intake and eliminating aspiration in adults with dysphagia and dementia.
We searched ALOIS (the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid SP, Embase via Ovid SP, PsycINFO via Ovid SP, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, LILACS via BIREME, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) Portal on 9 May 2018. We also checked the reference lists of relevant articles to identify any additional studies.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cluster-RCTs published in any language that measured any of the outcomes of interest. We included trials with adults with a clinical diagnosis of dementia with symptoms and signs of dysphagia confirmed on instrumental assessment. We included participants with all types, stages and severities of dementia. Control groups received either no intervention or interventions not involving diet modification or modification to sensory properties of food.
Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all potential studies identified. Data were extracted independently along with assessment of methodological quality using standard Cochrane methods. We contacted study authors for additional unpublished information.
No trials on modification of food met the inclusion criteria. We included two studies that examined modification to fluids. Both were part of the same large multicentre trial and included people with dementia and people with or without dementia and Parkinson's disease. Participation in the second trial was determined by results from the first trial. With unpublished data supplied by study authors, we examined data from participants with dementia only. The first study, a cross-over trial, investigated the immediate effects on aspiration of two viscosities of liquids (nectar thick and honey thick) compared to regular liquids in 351 participants with dementia using videofluoroscopy. Regular liquids with a chin down head posture, as well as regular liquids without any intervention were also compared. The sequence of interventions during videofluoroscopy may have influenced response to intervention. The second study, a parallel designed RCT, compared the effect of nectar and honey thick liquids with a chin down head posture over a three-month period in a subgroup of 260 participants with dementia. Outcomes were pneumonia and adverse intervention effects. Honey thick liquids, which are more consistent with descriptors for 'spoon thick' or 'extremely thick' liquids, showed a more positive impact on immediate elimination of aspiration during videofluoroscopy, but this consistency showed more adverse effects in the second follow-up study. During the second three-month follow-up trial, there were a greater number of incidents of pneumonia in participants receiving honey thick liquids than those receiving nectar thick liquids or taking regular liquids with a chin down posture. There were no deaths classified as 'definitely related' to the type of fluids prescribed. Neither trial addressed quality of life. Risk of bias for both studies is high. The overall quality of evidence for outcomes in this review is low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain about the immediate and long-term effects of modifying the consistency of fluid for swallowing difficulties in dementia as too few studies have been completed. There may be differences in outcomes depending on the grade of thickness of fluids and the sequence of interventions trialled in videofluoroscopy for people with dementia. Clinicians should be aware that while thickening fluids may have an immediate positive effect on swallowing, the long-term impact of thickened fluids on the health of the person with dementia should be considered. Further high-quality clinical trials are required.
痴呆症患者可能存在进食和吞咽困难(吞咽障碍)。改变食物或液体的黏稠度,或两者皆改变,是一种常见的管理策略。然而,饮食调整会影响生活质量,并可能导致脱水和营养不良。关于改变食物和液体的益处和风险的证据对于改善痴呆症和吞咽障碍患者的护理至关重要。
确定改变食物和液体的黏稠度在改善吞咽困难且患有痴呆症的成年人的经口摄入量及消除误吸方面的有效性和不良影响。
我们于2018年5月9日检索了ALOIS(Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组专业注册库)、Cochrane图书馆、通过Ovid SP检索的MEDLINE、通过Ovid SP检索的Embase、通过Ovid SP检索的PsycINFO、通过EBSCOhost检索的CINAHL、通过BIREME检索的LILACS、ClinicalTrials.gov以及世界卫生组织(WHO)门户网站。我们还检查了相关文章的参考文献列表以识别任何其他研究。
我们纳入了以任何语言发表的随机对照试验(RCT)、半随机对照试验和整群随机对照试验,这些试验测量了任何感兴趣的结局。我们纳入了经仪器评估确诊有痴呆症临床诊断且伴有吞咽困难症状和体征的成年人试验。我们纳入了所有类型、阶段和严重程度的痴呆症参与者。对照组未接受任何干预,或接受不涉及饮食调整或食物感官特性改变的干预。
两位综述作者独立评估所有识别出的潜在研究是否符合纳入标准。使用标准的Cochrane方法独立提取数据并评估方法学质量。我们联系研究作者获取额外的未发表信息。
没有关于改变食物的试验符合纳入标准。我们纳入了两项研究液体改变的研究。这两项研究均为同一大型多中心试验的一部分,纳入了患有痴呆症的人群以及患有或未患有痴呆症及帕金森病的人群。第二次试验的参与由第一次试验的结果决定。根据研究作者提供的未发表数据,我们仅检查了患有痴呆症参与者的数据。第一项研究是一项交叉试验,使用视频荧光吞咽造影术,在351名患有痴呆症的参与者中,研究了两种黏稠度的液体(花蜜状黏稠和蜂蜜状黏稠)与常规液体相比对误吸的即时影响。还比较了低头姿势下的常规液体以及未进行任何干预的常规液体。视频荧光吞咽造影术期间的干预顺序可能影响了对干预的反应。第二项研究是一项平行设计的随机对照试验,在260名患有痴呆症的参与者亚组中,比较了花蜜状和蜂蜜状黏稠液体在低头姿势下三个月期间的效果。结局指标为肺炎和不良干预效应。蜂蜜状黏稠液体,更符合“勺状黏稠”或“极度黏稠”液体的描述,在视频荧光吞咽造影术期间对即时消除误吸显示出更积极的影响,但这种黏稠度在第二项随访研究中显示出更多不良影响。在第二个为期三个月的随访试验中,接受蜂蜜状黏稠液体的参与者发生肺炎的事件数量多于接受花蜜状黏稠液体或低头姿势下饮用常规液体的参与者。没有死亡被归类为“与所开液体类型绝对相关”。两项试验均未涉及生活质量。两项研究的偏倚风险都很高。本综述中结局的总体证据质量很低。
由于完成的研究太少,我们不确定改变痴呆症患者吞咽困难时液体黏稠度的即时和长期影响。根据液体的黏稠度等级以及视频荧光吞咽造影术对痴呆症患者试验的干预顺序,结局可能存在差异。临床医生应意识到,虽然增稠液体可能对吞咽有即时积极影响,但应考虑增稠液体对痴呆症患者健康的长期影响。需要进一步的高质量临床试验。