Center for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Sep 25;14(9):e1006497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006497. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity have been used for reproducing many empirical findings on human brain functional connectivity. Features that have been shown to be reproducible by comparing modeled to empirical data include functional connectivity measured over several minutes of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, as well as its time-resolved fluctuations on a time scale of tens of seconds. However, comparison of modeled and empirical data has not been conducted yet for fluctuations in global network topology of functional connectivity, such as fluctuations between segregated and integrated topology or between high and low modularity topology. Since these global network-level fluctuations have been shown to be related to human cognition and behavior, there is an emerging need for clarifying their reproducibility with computational models. To address this problem, we directly compared fluctuations in global network topology of functional connectivity between modeled and empirical data, and clarified the degree to which a stationary model of spontaneous brain dynamics can reproduce the empirically observed fluctuations. Modeled fluctuations were simulated using a system of coupled phase oscillators wired according to brain structural connectivity. By performing model parameter search, we found that modeled fluctuations in global metrics quantifying network integration and modularity had more than 80% of magnitudes of those observed in the empirical data. Temporal properties of network states determined based on fluctuations in these metrics were also found to be reproducible, although their spatial patterns in functional connectivity did not perfectly matched. These results suggest that stationary models simulating resting-state activity can reproduce the magnitude of empirical fluctuations in segregation and integration, whereas additional factors, such as active mechanisms controlling non-stationary dynamics and/or greater accuracy of mapping brain structural connectivity, would be necessary for fully reproducing the spatial patterning associated with these fluctuations.
大规模脑活动的动态模型已被用于再现许多关于人脑功能连接的经验发现。通过将模型与经验数据进行比较,可以重现的功能包括在静息态功能磁共振成像数分钟内测量的功能连接,以及在数十秒的时间尺度上其时间分辨波动。然而,对于功能连接的全局网络拓扑的波动,例如在隔离和集成拓扑之间或在高和低模块性拓扑之间的波动,还没有进行模型与经验数据的比较。由于这些全局网络级别的波动已被证明与人类认知和行为有关,因此需要用计算模型来明确其可重现性。为了解决这个问题,我们直接比较了模型和经验数据之间功能连接全局网络拓扑的波动,并阐明了自发脑动力学的静止模型在多大程度上可以再现经验观察到的波动。使用根据大脑结构连接布线的耦合相振荡器系统模拟模型波动。通过执行模型参数搜索,我们发现,量化网络集成和模块性的全局度量的模型波动具有大于 80%的经验数据中观察到的幅度。还发现基于这些度量的网络状态的时间特性是可重现的,尽管它们在功能连接中的空间模式并不完全匹配。这些结果表明,模拟静息状态活动的静止模型可以再现经验波动的幅度在隔离和集成方面,而对于完全再现与这些波动相关的空间模式,则需要其他因素,例如控制非静止动力学的主动机制和/或更高的大脑结构连接映射准确性。