Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States of America.
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204320. eCollection 2018.
Human-lion conflict is one of the leading threats to lion populations and while livestock loss is a source of conflict, the degree to which livestock depredation is tolerated by people varies between regions and across cultures. Knowledge of local attitudes towards lions and identification of drivers of human-lion conflict can help formulate mitigation measures aimed at promoting coexistence of humans with lions. We assessed locals' attitudes towards lions in and around Gambella National Park and compared the findings with published data from Kafa Biosphere Reserve, both in western Ethiopia. We used household interviews to quantify livestock loss. We found that depredation was relatively low and that disease and theft were the top factors of livestock loss. Remarkably, however, tolerance of lions was lower around Gambella National Park than in Kafa Biosphere Reserve. Multivariate analysis revealed that education level, number of livestock per household, livestock loss due to depredation, and livestock loss due to theft were strong predictors of locals' attitude towards lion population growth and conservation. We show that the amount of livestock depredation alone is not sufficient to understand human-lion conflicts and we highlight the importance of accounting for cultural differences in lion conservation. The low cultural value of lions in the Gambella region corroborate the findings of our study. In combination with growing human population and land-use change pressures, low cultural value poses serious challenges to long-term lion conservation in the Gambella region. We recommend using Arnstein's ladder of participation in conservation education programs to move towards proactive involvement of locals in conservation.
人与狮子的冲突是狮子种群面临的主要威胁之一,虽然家畜损失是冲突的一个根源,但人们对家畜被捕食的容忍程度因地区和文化而异。了解当地人对狮子的态度以及确定人与狮子冲突的驱动因素,可以帮助制定旨在促进人与狮子共存的缓解措施。我们评估了甘贝拉国家公园及其周边地区当地人对狮子的态度,并将研究结果与埃塞俄比亚西部卡法生物保护区发表的数据进行了比较。我们使用家庭访谈来量化家畜损失。我们发现,捕食的情况相对较少,疾病和盗窃是家畜损失的主要原因。然而,令人惊讶的是,甘贝拉国家公园周围的狮子容忍度低于卡法生物保护区。多元分析表明,教育水平、每户家畜数量、因捕食而导致的家畜损失以及因盗窃而导致的家畜损失是当地人对狮子种群增长和保护态度的重要预测因素。我们表明,仅捕食家畜的数量不足以理解人与狮子的冲突,我们强调了在狮子保护中考虑文化差异的重要性。甘贝拉地区狮子的文化价值较低,这与我们的研究结果相符。结合不断增长的人口和土地利用变化压力,低文化价值给甘贝拉地区狮子的长期保护带来了严峻挑战。我们建议在保护教育计划中使用 Arnstein 的参与阶梯,以促进当地人积极参与保护。