Kaczor Christopher
Loyola Marymount University, Bellarmine College of Liberal Arts - Philosophy, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Bioethics. 2018 Nov;32(9):634-638. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12512. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
Both many critics of abortion and many defenders of abortion have suggested that artificial wombs could end the abortion debate. If the fetus is removed from the uterus, women have an end to an unwanted pregnancy. If the living fetus is then put in an artificial uterus for ectogenesis, there is no termination of the life of the fetus. Joona Räsänen challenges this view in his article, Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus. Räsänen provides three arguments for a right to secure the death of the human being in utero, namely the 'right not to become a biological parent argument', the 'right to genetic privacy argument', and the 'right to property argument'. This article critiques these three arguments for a right to the death of the fetus.
许多堕胎批评者和许多堕胎辩护者都认为，人造子宫可能会终结堕胎辩论。如果将胎儿从子宫中取出，女性就结束了意外怀孕。如果将存活的胎儿放入人造子宫进行体外发育，那么胎儿的生命就不会终止。约纳·拉塞宁在他的文章《体外发育、堕胎与胎儿死亡权》中对这一观点提出了质疑。拉塞宁提出了三条关于确保子宫内人类死亡权的论据，即“不成为生物学父母的权利论据”、“基因隐私权论据”和“财产权论据”。本文对这三条关于胎儿死亡权的论据进行了批判。
