• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Congenital anomalies of the upper limb among the Japanese in Sapporo.

作者信息

Ogino T, Minami A, Fukuda K, Kato H

出版信息

J Hand Surg Br. 1986 Oct;11(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(86)90159-2.

DOI:10.1016/0266-7681(86)90159-2
PMID:3025320
Abstract

Nine hundred and forty three patients with nine hundred and fifty-five congenital upper limb anomalies are classified according to the Swanson's classification. Relative incidence of each type of anomaly, sex incidence, affected side, associated abnormalities and familial history are analysed. The occurrence of congenital upper limb anomalies is also compared with Chinese and Western studies. The characteristic feature in this series is that the incidence of typical syndactyly is not as high as expected. Two problems of Swanson's classification encountered in this analysis are discussed. One of the problems is the relation between polydactyly, syndactyly and typical cleft hand. The other is the relation between brachysyndactyly, atypical cleft hand and transverse deficiency.

摘要

相似文献

1
Congenital anomalies of the upper limb among the Japanese in Sapporo.
J Hand Surg Br. 1986 Oct;11(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(86)90159-2.
2
Congenital anomalies of the upper limb among the Chinese population in Hong Kong.
J Hand Surg Am. 1982 Nov;7(6):563-5. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(82)80102-0.
3
Patterns of combined limb malformations.肢体联合畸形模式
Teratology. 1977 Oct;16(2):203-9. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420160215.
4
Cleft hand, syndactyly and hypoplastic thumb.
J Hand Surg Br. 1992 Jun;17(3):365-70. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90132-l.
5
Teratogenic mechanisms of longitudinal deficiency and cleft hand.纵向发育不全和裂手的致畸机制。
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2004 Apr-Jun;36(2-3):108-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-817872.
6
The position of symbrachydactyly in the classification of congenital hand anomalies.先天性手部畸形分类中短指畸形的位置。
J Hand Surg Br. 1994 Jun;19(3):350-4. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90088-4.
7
[Arterial patterns in congenital deformities of the hand (author's transl)].[手部先天性畸形的动脉模式(作者译)]
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1979 Nov;53(11):1627-40.
8
The Classification of Swanson for Congenital Anomalies of Upper Limb Modified by the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand (JSSH).日本手部外科学会(JSSH)修订的上肢先天性畸形的斯旺森分类法。
Hand Surg. 2015;20(2):237-50. doi: 10.1142/S0218810415300041.
9
Congenital upper limb deficiencies and associated malformations in Finland: a population-based study.芬兰先天性上肢缺陷及相关畸形:一项基于人群的研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Jun;36(6):1058-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 May 23.
10
Congenital Anomalies of the Hand--Principles of Management.手部先天性畸形——治疗原则
Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan;47(1):153-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in Korea: A nationwide population-based study.韩国先天性上肢畸形的流行病学:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 9;16(3):e0248105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248105. eCollection 2021.
2
A Case of Nonsyndromic Unilateral Cleft Hand with Central Polydactyly, Syndactyly, and Thumb Hypoplasia: Support for a Common Etiology.一例非综合征性单侧裂手伴中央多指、并指及拇指发育不全:对共同病因的支持
J Hand Microsurg. 2019 Dec;11(3):154-156. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669364. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
Congenital limb deficiency in Japan: a cross-sectional nationwide survey on its epidemiology.
日本的先天性肢体缺损:一项关于其流行病学的全国性横断面调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 27;19(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2195-3.
4
A new documentation system for congenital absent digits.一种用于先天性缺指的新记录系统。
Hand (N Y). 2012 Dec;7(4):391-9. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9450-0.
5
Teaching pediatric hand surgery in Vietnam.在越南开展小儿手外科教学工作。
Hand (N Y). 2007 Mar;2(1):16-24; discussion 25-6. doi: 10.1007/s11552-006-9017-z.