• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量压力气雾剂使用指导:医务人员视角。

Imperative Instruction for Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers: Provider Perspectives.

机构信息

University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.

Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2019 Mar;64(3):292-298. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06302. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

DOI:10.4187/respcare.06302
PMID:30254041
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports show that many patients do not use their pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) effectively. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute recommends that health-care providers educate and assess patients' pMDI technique at each opportunity. However, limited data exist regarding how often pediatric primary care providers perform assessments and which methods they use. We sought to (1) identify instructional methods used to teach pMDI use, (2) describe how pMDI use is reassessed at follow-up visits, and (3) describe primary care provider attitudes and barriers to in-office pMDI instruction.

METHODS

A 34-item electronic survey was distributed from August to December 2016 via E-mail to local pediatric primary care providers. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty two of 223 potential primary care providers (28%) responded. Physicians and nurse practitioners were identified most often as the providers of pMDI education (53%). When first prescribing a pMDI, only 10% reported having the patient practice inhaler use in the office and receive feedback. Only 19% "always" reassessed the technique, even for patients with poorly controlled asthma. Among those who reassessed the technique, most (76%) did so verbally, and only 42% asked the patients to demonstrate pMDI use. Only 32% reported that typical patient education in their setting was adequate to ensure proper pMDI use. Commonly cited barriers included time (84%) and access to demo pMDIs (67%). Provider solutions included video tutorials and access to demo inhalers.

CONCLUSIONS

Many pediatric primary care providers did not demonstrate or have patients practice pMDI use when teaching or assessing pMDI technique, and the reassessment rate was low even for patients with poorly controlled asthma. Identifying and training a consistent pMDI educator and obtaining demo pMDIs may abate some barriers. Respiratory therapists could appropriately fulfill this educator role. Brief, repeated pMDI practice for motor learning could promote more stable pMDI mastery.

摘要

背景

报告显示,许多患者无法有效地使用他们的压力定量吸入器(pMDI)。美国国立心肺血液研究所建议医疗保健提供者在每个机会都对患者的 pMDI 技术进行教育和评估。然而,关于儿科初级保健提供者进行评估的频率以及他们使用的方法,数据有限。我们试图(1)确定用于教授 pMDI 使用的教学方法,(2)描述在随访就诊时如何重新评估 pMDI 使用情况,以及(3)描述初级保健提供者对在办公室进行 pMDI 指导的态度和障碍。

方法

一项 34 项的电子调查于 2016 年 8 月至 12 月通过电子邮件分发给当地儿科初级保健提供者。采用描述性统计进行分析。

结果

在 223 名潜在的初级保健提供者中,有 62 名(28%)做出了回应。医生和护士从业者被确定为 pMDI 教育的提供者(53%)。首次开具 pMDI 处方时,只有 10%的人报告让患者在办公室练习吸入器使用并获得反馈。即使对于哮喘控制不佳的患者,只有 19%的人“总是”重新评估技术。在那些重新评估技术的人中,大多数(76%)是通过口头进行的,只有 42%的人要求患者演示 pMDI 使用。只有 32%的人报告说,他们所在环境的典型患者教育足以确保正确使用 pMDI。常见的障碍包括时间(84%)和获得演示 pMDI(67%)。提供者的解决方案包括视频教程和演示吸入器的使用。

结论

许多儿科初级保健提供者在教授或评估 pMDI 技术时没有演示或让患者练习 pMDI 使用,即使对于哮喘控制不佳的患者,重新评估率也很低。确定和培训一致的 pMDI 教育者并获得演示 pMDI 可能会缓解一些障碍。呼吸治疗师可以适当担任该教育者角色。为运动学习进行简短、重复的 pMDI 练习可以促进更稳定的 pMDI 掌握。

相似文献

1
Imperative Instruction for Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhalers: Provider Perspectives.定量压力气雾剂使用指导:医务人员视角。
Respir Care. 2019 Mar;64(3):292-298. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06302. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Technique training does not improve the ability of most patients to use pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs).技术培训并不能提高大多数患者使用压力定量吸入器(pMDIs)的能力。
Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Mar;20(1):92-6. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2010.00088.
3
Asthma patients' inability to use a pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) correctly correlates with poor asthma control as defined by the global initiative for asthma (GINA) strategy: a retrospective analysis.哮喘患者无法正确使用压力定量吸入器(pMDI)与全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)策略所定义的哮喘控制不佳相关:一项回顾性分析。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Dec;22(4):406-11. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00084.
4
Dose counting and the use of pressurized metered-dose inhalers: running on empty.剂量计数与压力定量吸入器的使用:即将耗尽
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Jul;97(1):34-8. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61366-x.
5
Comparison of patient preference and ease of teaching inhaler technique for Pulmicort Turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose inhalers.普米克都保与压力定量吸入器在患者偏好及吸入器技术教学简易程度方面的比较。
J Aerosol Med. 2004 Summer;17(2):129-39. doi: 10.1089/0894268041457174.
6
Predictors of correct technique in patients using pressurized metered dose inhalers.使用压力定量吸入器患者正确技术的预测因素。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0386-6.
7
Variability in Delivered Dose from Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler Formulations Due to a Delay Between Shake and Fire.由于摇晃与喷射之间的延迟导致的定量压力气雾剂剂型给药剂量的变异性。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2017 Feb;30(1):71-79. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1284. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Mastery of pMDI technique, asthma control and quality-of-life of children with asthma: A randomized controlled study comparing two inhaler technique training approaches.定量压力气雾剂技术的掌握、哮喘控制及哮喘儿童的生活质量:一项比较两种吸入器技术培训方法的随机对照研究。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;43:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
The effect of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurized metered-dose inhaler on patient-reported outcomes in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.布地奈德福莫特罗单一压力定量吸入器对轻至中度持续性哮喘成年患者报告结局的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):879-94. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273354. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
10
Provider demonstration and assessment of child device technique during pediatric asthma visits.在儿科哮喘就诊期间,提供者展示并评估儿童使用设备的技术。
Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):642-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1206. Epub 2011 Mar 28.