• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using objective clinical data to track progress on preventing and treating sepsis: CDC's new 'Adult Sepsis Event' surveillance strategy.利用客观临床数据追踪脓毒症防治进展：美国疾病控制与预防中心新的“成人脓毒症事件”监测策略
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):305-309. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008331. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
Evaluation of CDC's Hemophilia Surveillance Program - Universal Data Collection (1998-2011) and Community Counts (2011-2019), United States.美国疾病预防控制中心血友病监测项目评估-通用数据收集（1998-2011）和社区计数（2011-2019）。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Sep 4;69(5):1-18. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6905a1.
3
Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2017.2017年美国疟疾监测
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Mar 19;70(2):1-35. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7002a1.
4
Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2016.疟疾监测 - 美国，2016 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 May 17;68(5):1-35. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6805a1.
5
CDC's Public Health Surveillance of Cancer.美国疾病控制与预防中心的癌症公共卫生监测。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 May 18;14:E39. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160480.
6
Strategy to Action: Incorporating CDC's 10 Evidence-Based Strategies in Overdose Prevention and Surveillance Efforts.从战略到行动：将美国疾病控制与预防中心的10项循证策略纳入过量用药预防和监测工作
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(4):424-427. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001391.
7
Modernizing an Online Data Monitoring System for the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.为美国疾病控制与预防中心的国家癌症登记计划现代化在线数据监测系统。
J Registry Manag. 2020 Fall;47(3):172-174.
8
CDC's Program Evaluation Journey: 1999 to Present.美国疾病控制与预防中心的项目评估历程：1999年至今。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Jul/Aug;133(4):356-359. doi: 10.1177/0033354918778034. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
CDC's Lead Poisoning Prevention Program: A Long-standing Responsibility and Commitment to Protect Children From Lead Exposure.美国疾病控制与预防中心的铅中毒预防计划：长期以来一直致力于保护儿童免受铅暴露的责任和承诺。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Jan/Feb;25 Suppl 1, Lead Poisoning Prevention(Suppl 1 LEAD POISONING PREVENTION):S5-S12. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000868.
10
Rethinking the CDC's pneumonia secondary bloodstream infection attribution criteria during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with fungal pneumonia.重新思考疾病控制与预防中心（CDC）在新冠疫情期间针对真菌性肺炎患者的肺炎继发性血流感染归因标准。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Aug;126:128-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of common clinical confounders on performance of deep-learning-based sepsis risk assessment.评估常见临床混杂因素对基于深度学习的脓毒症风险评估性能的影响。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jul 15;8:1452471. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1452471. eCollection 2025.
2
Sepsis Prediction Models are Trained on Labels that Diverge from Clinician-Recommended Treatment Times.脓毒症预测模型是基于与临床医生推荐的治疗时间不一致的标签进行训练的。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1215-1224. eCollection 2024.
3
Reformulating patient stratification for targeting interventions by accounting for severity of downstream outcomes resulting from disease onset: a case study in sepsis.通过考虑疾病发作导致的下游结果的严重程度来重新制定患者分层以进行靶向干预：脓毒症的案例研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):905-913. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf036.
4
What Can We Learn from Differences in Hospitals' Sepsis Care?我们能从医院脓毒症护理的差异中学到什么？
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr;211(4):546-547. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202501-0106ED.
5
Methods for identifying health status from routinely collected health data: An overview.从常规收集的健康数据中识别健康状况的方法：概述。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Mar;14(1):101100. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101100. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
External validation of the Epic sepsis predictive model in 2 county emergency departments.Epic脓毒症预测模型在两个县急诊科的外部验证
JAMIA Open. 2024 Nov 13;7(4):ooae133. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae133. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
[Urosepsis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management-an update].[尿脓毒症：病理生理学、诊断与管理——最新进展]
Urologie. 2024 Jun;63(6):543-550. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02336-0. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
8
Improving Sepsis Outcomes in the Era of Pay-for-Performance and Electronic Quality Measures: A Joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP Position Paper.在按绩效付费和电子质量措施时代提高脓毒症治疗效果：IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP 联合立场文件。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 20;78(3):505-513. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad447.
9
Fucoxanthin Ameliorates Sepsis via Modulating Microbiota by Targeting IRF3 Activation.岩藻黄质通过靶向 IRF3 激活调节微生物群来改善脓毒症。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 7;24(18):13803. doi: 10.3390/ijms241813803.
10
Performance of bedside tools for predicting infection-related mortality and administrative data for sepsis surveillance: An observational cohort study.床边工具预测感染相关死亡率的性能和脓毒症监测的行政数据：一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0280228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280228. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Variability in determining sepsis time zero and bundle compliance rates for the centers for medicare and medicaid services SEP-1 measure.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 SEP-1 衡量标准中确定脓毒症时间零点和捆绑包依从率的变异性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):994-996. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.134. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
2
Reporting of Sepsis Cases for Performance Measurement Versus for Reimbursement in New York State.纽约州为了绩效测量而报告败血症病例与为了报销而报告败血症病例。
Crit Care Med. 2018 May;46(5):666-673. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003005.
3
Global trends in the awareness of sepsis: insights from search engine data between 2012 and 2017.全球脓毒症意识趋势：2012 年至 2017 年搜索引擎数据的洞察。
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 17;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1914-8.
4
The New York Sepsis Severity Score: Development of a Risk-Adjusted Severity Model for Sepsis.纽约脓毒症严重程度评分：脓毒症风险调整严重程度模型的建立。
Crit Care Med. 2018 May;46(5):674-683. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002824.
5
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.
6
Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority - A WHO Resolution.将脓毒症确认为全球卫生重点——一项世界卫生组织决议
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):414-417. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707170. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
7
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
8
Estimating Ten-Year Trends in Septic Shock Incidence and Mortality in United States Academic Medical Centers Using Clinical Data.利用临床数据估算美国学术医疗中心脓毒症休克发病率和死亡率的十年趋势
Chest. 2017 Feb;151(2):278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
9
Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes.诊断脓毒症具有主观性且差异很大：一项使用病例 vignettes 对重症监护医生进行的调查。
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 6;20:89. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1266-9.
10
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

Using objective clinical data to track progress on preventing and treating sepsis: CDC's new 'Adult Sepsis Event' surveillance strategy.

作者信息

Rhee Chanu, Dantes Raymund Barretto, Epstein Lauren, Klompas Michael

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):305-309. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008331. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008331
PMID:30254095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6557151/
Abstract
摘要