• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术后阴道穹窿引流

Vaginal vault drainage after complicated single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Lee Soo-Jeong, Roh Hyun-Jin, Cho Hyun-Jin, Lee Sang-Hun, Ahn Jun-Woo, Kwon Yong-Soon

机构信息

Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Inje College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun;6(2):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.gmit.2016.04.005
PMID:30254876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6113973/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of vaginal vault drainage after complicated singleport access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPA-LAVH).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Ulsan University Hospital (tertiary teaching hospital), South Korea.

PATIENTS

A total of 359 women underwent SPA-LAVH for the following conditions: benign uterine tumor, preinvasive uterine lesion, and microinvasive cervical cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

The participants included 124 women with vault drains and 235 women without drains.

MEASUREMENTS

Surgical outcomes, perioperative complications and morbidity, postoperative febrile morbidity.

RESULTS

There were no differences in background features between drain and no-drain groups. In surgical outcomes, mean uterine weight (364.2 ± 184.9 g vs. 263.7 ± 138.6 g; < 0.001), operation time (87.4 ± 21.5 min vs. 73.0 ± 17.6 min; < 0.001), blood loss (225.3 ± 122.2 mL vs. 150.4 ± 95.2 mL; < 0.001), and hemoglobin decline (1.97 ± 0.96 g/dL vs. 1.42 ± 0.89 g/dL; < 0.001) were significantly larger for the drain group compared with the no-drain group. However, with regard to postoperative morbidity and complications, there were no group differences in the transfusion rates (6.5% vs. 3.8%; = 0.300), intraoperative complications (2.4% vs. 1.3%; = 0.420), perioperative complications (2.4% vs. 0.9%; = 0.345), and febrile morbidity ≥ 37.5°C (8.9% vs. 11.5%; = 0.477), although the drain group was more prone to the development of pelvic fluid collection and febrile morbidity than the no-drain group.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal vault drainage could be a safe alternative that allows for the management of postoperative morbidity and retains the advantages of minimally invasive surgery after complicated SPA-LAVH.

摘要

研究目的

评估复杂单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(SPA-LAVH)后阴道残端引流的可行性和安全性。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

韩国蔚山大学医院(三级教学医院)。

患者

共有359名女性因以下情况接受了SPA-LAVH手术:良性子宫肿瘤、子宫浸润前病变和微浸润性宫颈癌。

干预措施

参与者包括124名有残端引流的女性和235名无引流的女性。

测量指标

手术结果、围手术期并发症和发病率、术后发热发病率。

结果

引流组和无引流组的背景特征无差异。在手术结果方面,引流组的平均子宫重量(364.2±184.9克对263.7±138.6克;<0.001)、手术时间(87.4±21.5分钟对73.0±17.6分钟;<0.001)、失血量(225.3±122.2毫升对150.4±95.2毫升;<0.001)和血红蛋白下降(1.97±0.96克/分升对1.42±0.89克/分升;<0.001)均显著高于无引流组。然而,在术后发病率和并发症方面,输血率(6.5%对3.8%;=0.300)、术中并发症(2.4%对1.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/326f/6113973/43452f0b1e59/GMIT-6-58-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/326f/6113973/a4268fd0ce5a/GMIT-6-58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/326f/6113973/43452f0b1e59/GMIT-6-58-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/326f/6113973/a4268fd0ce5a/GMIT-6-58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/326f/6113973/43452f0b1e59/GMIT-6-58-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Vaginal vault drainage after complicated single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.复杂单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术后阴道穹窿引流
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017 Apr-Jun;6(2):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
2
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study.经自然腔道内镜手术辅助与单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的病例匹配研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):624-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
3
Efficiency of using a Foley catheter as a pelvic drain in vaginal hysterectomy.在阴道子宫切除术中使用 Foley 导管作为盆腔引流管的效率
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jul;226:21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Single-port vs. conventional multi-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes and complications.单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的比较:手术结局和并发症的比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(2):366-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.026. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
Operative outcomes of single-port-access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.经单孔腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与经单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的手术效果比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):486-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.07.003.
6
Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes.经单孔腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的围手术期结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2248-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0944-y. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
7
The effects of vault drainage on postoperative morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease: a randomised controlled trial.穹窿引流对良性妇科疾病经阴道子宫切除术后术后发病率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2012 Feb;119(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03170.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
8
Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove.单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术:一种使用伤口牵开器和手套的新方法。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 31.
9
Vaginal hysterectomy vs. laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a retrospective study.有症状的子宫平滑肌瘤女性行阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的回顾性研究
Prz Menopauzalny. 2014 Sep;13(4):242-6. doi: 10.5114/pm.2014.45000. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
10
Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more.无气腹单孔腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术治疗重量500g及以上的大子宫。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaginal vault drainage as an effective and feasible alternative in laparoscopic hysterectomy.阴道穹窿引流作为腹腔镜子宫切除术中一种有效且可行的替代方法。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Sep;65(5):477-482. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22083. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降低阴道子宫切除术后穹窿血肿发病率的干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul;30(7):1061-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3829-6. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus.经脐单孔腹腔镜下单极电切术治疗巨大子宫
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75(1):16-20. doi: 10.1159/000341141. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
2
The effects of vault drainage on postoperative morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease: a randomised controlled trial.穹窿引流对良性妇科疾病经阴道子宫切除术后术后发病率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2012 Feb;119(3):348-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03170.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
3
Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的随机对照研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):906-912. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666a.
4
Symptomatic pelvic hematoma following transvaginal reconstructive pelvic surgery: incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, and outcome.经阴道重建性骨盆手术后出现症状性骨盆血肿:发生率、临床表现、危险因素和结局。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Dec;153(2):211-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
5
Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes.经单孔腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的围手术期结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2248-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0944-y. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
6
Residual pelvic fluid using two types of drains at laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜检查时使用两种引流管的盆腔残余液体:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1293-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817589cd.
7
Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study.子宫切除术的严重并发症:VALUE研究
BJOG. 2004 Jul;111(7):688-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00174.x.
8
Sonographic detection of fluid collections and postoperative morbidity following Cesarean section and hysterectomy.剖宫产和子宫切除术后超声检测液体聚集情况及术后发病率
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;23(4):388-92. doi: 10.1002/uog.1023.
9
Effects of closed suction drainage in reducing pain after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.封闭式吸引引流对降低腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术后疼痛的影响。
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 May;10(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60301-5.
10
A prospective, randomized study of closed-suction drainage after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002 Aug;9(3):346-52. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60415-x.