Suppr超能文献

左半结直肠切除术后一期吻合的安全性:一项国际性、多中心前瞻性审计。

Safety of primary anastomosis following emergency left sided colorectal resection: an international, multi-centre prospective audit.

机构信息

European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Cohort Studies Committee, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, València, Spain.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20 Suppl 6:47-57. doi: 10.1111/codi.14373.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Some evidence suggests that primary anastomosis following left sided colorectal resection in the emergency setting may be safe in selected patients, and confer favourable outcomes to permanent enterostomy. The aim of this study was to compare the major postoperative complication rate in patients undergoing end stoma vs primary anastomosis following emergency left sided colorectal resection.

METHODS

A pre-planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology 2017 audit. Adult patients (> 16 years) who underwent emergency (unplanned, within 24 h of hospital admission) left sided colonic or rectal resection were included. The primary endpoint was the 30-day major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 to 5).

RESULTS

From 591 patients, 455 (77%) received an end stoma, 103 a primary anastomosis (17%) and 33 primary anastomosis with defunctioning stoma (6%). In multivariable models, anastomosis was associated with a similar major complication rate to end stoma (adjusted odds ratio for end stoma 1.52, 95%CI 0.83-2.79, P = 0.173). Although a defunctioning stoma was not associated with reduced anastomotic leak (12% defunctioned [4/33] vs 13% not defunctioned [13/97], adjusted odds ratio 2.19, 95%CI 0.43-11.02, P = 0.343), it was associated with less severe complications (75% [3/4] with defunctioning stoma, 86.7% anastomosis only [13/15]), a lower mortality rate (0% [0/4] vs 20% [3/15]), and fewer reoperations (50% [2/4] vs 73% [11/15]) when a leak did occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary anastomosis in selected patients appears safe after left sided emergency colorectal resection. A defunctioning stoma might mitigate against risk of subsequent complications.

摘要

引言

一些证据表明,在某些患者中,急诊左侧结直肠切除术后进行一期吻合可能是安全的,并能为永久性肠造口带来有利的结果。本研究旨在比较接受急诊左侧结直肠切除术后行末端造口术与一期吻合术患者的主要术后并发症发生率。

方法

这是对欧洲结直肠外科学会 2017 年审计的预先计划分析。纳入了接受急诊(无计划,入院后 24 小时内)左侧结肠或直肠切除术的成年患者(>16 岁)。主要终点是 30 天主要并发症发生率(Clavien-Dindo 分级 3-5 级)。

结果

在 591 例患者中,455 例(77%)接受了末端造口术,103 例接受了一期吻合术(17%),33 例接受了一期吻合术+预防性造口术(6%)。在多变量模型中,吻合术与末端造口术的主要并发症发生率相似(末端造口术的调整比值比为 1.52,95%CI 0.83-2.79,P=0.173)。虽然预防性造口术并未降低吻合口漏的发生率(预防性造口组 12%[4/33],未预防性造口组 13%[13/97],调整比值比 2.19,95%CI 0.43-11.02,P=0.343),但它与更轻微的并发症相关(有预防性造口术的患者中 75%[3/4],仅有吻合术的患者中 86.7%[13/15]),漏发生时死亡率更低(有预防性造口术的患者中 0%[0/4],仅有吻合术的患者中 20%[3/15]),再次手术率更低(有预防性造口术的患者中 50%[2/4],仅有吻合术的患者中 73%[11/15])。

结论

在选择合适的患者中,急诊左侧结直肠切除术后进行一期吻合似乎是安全的。预防性造口术可能降低后续并发症的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验