• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证卫生保健的 Joanna Briggs 研究所更新模型。

The updated Joanna Briggs Institute Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare.

机构信息

The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019 Mar;17(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155.

DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155
PMID:30256247
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Joanna Briggs Institute Model for Evidence-Based Healthcare was first conceptualized in 2005. This developmental framework for evidence-based practice situated healthcare evidence, in its broadest sense, and its role and use within complex healthcare settings. The Model was recently reviewed with a view to understanding its utility by health professionals, researchers and policy makers, and the analysis revealed a need to reconsider the composition and language of the Model to ensure its currency on the international stage.

MAIN BODY

The current article proposes a revised Joanna Briggs Institute Model for consideration by the international community. It seeks to clarify the conceptual integration of evidence generation, synthesis, transfer and implementation, linking how these occur with the necessarily challenging dynamics that contribute to whether translation of evidence into policy and practice is successful. It also accounts for the role of different types of evidence, both research and text and opinion, and how evidence contributes to achieving improved health outcomes globally. In addition, it is centered on the importance of accounting for evidence of feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

The Model has been an important part of the Institute's development, both from a scientific and organizational perspective. Given the changing international discourse relating to evidence and its translation into policy and practice over the course of the last decade, it was opportune to revisit the Model and assess its ongoing applicability in its current form. Some alterations have been made for consideration in the hope that the Model reflects the Institute's current conceptualization of evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) and to increase its relevance and use pragmatically.

摘要

背景

循证卫生保健的 Joanna Briggs 研究所模式于 2005 年首次提出。这个循证实践的发展框架将最广泛意义上的卫生保健证据及其在复杂卫生保健环境中的作用和用途置于特定位置。最近对该模型进行了审查,以了解卫生专业人员、研究人员和政策制定者对其的使用情况,分析结果表明需要重新考虑模型的组成和语言,以确保其在国际舞台上的时效性。

主要内容

本文提出了一个经修订的 Joanna Briggs 研究所模式,供国际社会审议。它旨在澄清证据产生、综合、转移和实施的概念整合,将这些过程与促成证据转化为政策和实践的必然挑战动态联系起来。它还考虑了不同类型的证据(研究证据和文本及观点证据)的作用,以及证据如何有助于实现全球健康结果的改善。此外,它还侧重于考虑可行性、适当性、有意义性和有效性证据的重要性。

结论

该模式从科学和组织的角度一直是研究所发展的重要组成部分。鉴于过去十年中与证据及其转化为政策和实践相关的国际话语不断变化,重新审视该模式并评估其在当前形式下的持续适用性是适时的。已经进行了一些修改以供审议,希望该模式反映研究所目前对循证卫生保健的概念化,并提高其相关性和实用性。

相似文献

1
The updated Joanna Briggs Institute Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare.循证卫生保健的 Joanna Briggs 研究所更新模型。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019 Mar;17(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155.
2
Redeveloping the JBI Model of Evidence Based Healthcare.重新开发 JBI 循证医疗保健模式。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Dec;16(4):227-241. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000139.
3
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
9
Now that we're here, where are we? The JBI approach to evidence-based healthcare 20 years on.既然我们已经来到这里,我们身处何方?20年后的循证医疗的循证卫生保健国际协作网(JBI)方法。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):117-20. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000053.
10
Evidence transfer: ensuring end users are aware of, have access to, and understand the evidence.证据传递:确保最终用户了解、获得并理解证据。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Jun;16(2):83-89. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000134.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of motivational messages on nurses' professional quality of life: a systematic review.激励信息对护士职业生活质量的有效性:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Sep 8;14(3):e003100. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003100.
2
Initiatives to support nursing workforce sustainability: a rapid umbrella review protocol.支持护理劳动力可持续性的举措:一项快速综合综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 5;15(9):e090249. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090249.
3
Clinical nurses' evidence-based healthcare competence and associated factors: a regional cross-sectional study.
临床护士的循证医疗能力及相关因素:一项区域性横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 19;24(1):1091. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03722-5.
4
Phytoestrogenic Food Intake and the Early Development of Pubertal Characteristics: A Scoping Review and Evidence Assessment.植物雌激素的食物摄入量与青春期特征的早期发育:一项范围综述和证据评估
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Aug 16;12:30502225251361989. doi: 10.1177/30502225251361989. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Evidence summary of meaning in life intervention for cancer patients.癌症患者生命意义干预的证据总结
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 30;15:1603349. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1603349. eCollection 2025.
6
Prognostic factors affecting return to work in cancer patients: a systematic review.影响癌症患者重返工作岗位的预后因素:一项系统综述。
Occup Environ Med. 2025 Aug 25;82(6):305-312. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2025-110212.
7
Structural barriers and facilitators to accessing postsurgical rehabilitation in adults who were treated with surgery for low back pain: protocol for a scoping review.接受过腰痛手术治疗的成年人在获取术后康复服务方面的结构障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述的方案
Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;14(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02919-8.
8
Hip muscle changes in femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.股骨髋臼撞击综合征中髋部肌肉的变化:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 29;20(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06135-x.
9
An Evaluation of Polish Women's Knowledge of Perineal Incision: A Cross-Sectional Study.波兰女性会阴切开术知识评估:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 19;14(14):5142. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145142.
10
Initial Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Croatian Version of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test.《皮珀-祖尔科夫斯基压疮知识测试克罗地亚语版的初步验证及心理测量学特性》
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(13):1479. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131479.