• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用护理转接测量法捕获急诊科出院质量:一项试点研究。

Capturing Emergency Department Discharge Quality With the Care Transitions Measure: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Center for Scholarship in Patient Care Quality and Safety, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):605-609. doi: 10.1111/acem.13623. Epub 2019 May 23.

DOI:10.1111/acem.13623
PMID:30256486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent attention has been given to developing measures to capture the quality of ED transitions of care. We examined the utility of a patient-reported measure of transitional care, the Care Transitions Measure-3 (CTM-3), in the ED setting and its association with outcomes of care after ED discharge.

METHODS

A telephone survey was conducted of a convenience sample of patients 14 days after discharge from two emergency departments (EDs) in an academic health system. Patients responded to three statements using a four-point agreement scale (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree): 1) "The hospital staff took my preferences and those of my family or caregiver into account when deciding what my health care needs would be"; 2) " When I left the ER, I had a good understanding of the things I was responsible for in managing my health"; and 3) "When I left the hospital, I clearly understood the purpose for taking each of my medications." Patients were also queried about outcomes after ED discharge that are known to be related to ED care transitions including medication adherence, completion of recommended follow-up, and return visits to the ED. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between the CTM-3 score (on a 100-point scale) and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Among 1,832 patients called, 576 were reached by phone, and 410 consented and completed our survey, representing a 22.4% response rate of patients we attempted to call. A 10-point increase in the CTM-3 score (better care experiences) was associated with a 12% decrease in the odds of having an ED return visit (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-1.00) and a 45% increase in the odds of taking prescribed medications as recommended (AOR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.12-1.87). There was no association between CTM-3 score and completion of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTM-3 is associated with outcomes of care after an ED visit, including ED return visits and medication adherence, and may have utility as a patient-reported measure of ED transitions of care.

摘要

背景

最近,人们越来越关注开发衡量急诊过渡护理质量的措施。我们研究了一种患者报告的过渡护理衡量工具,即过渡护理衡量-3 版(CTM-3)在急诊环境中的效用,以及其与急诊出院后护理结局的关系。

方法

在一个学术医疗系统的两家急诊部,对出院后 14 天的便利样本患者进行了电话调查。患者使用四点同意量表(非常不同意、不同意、同意、非常同意)对三个陈述进行了回答:1)“当决定我的医疗需求时,医院工作人员考虑了我的个人偏好以及我的家人或护理人员的偏好”;2)“当我离开急诊室时,我非常了解我负责管理自己健康的事情”;3)“当我离开医院时,我清楚地了解我服用每种药物的目的。”还询问了患者出院后与急诊护理过渡相关的已知结局,包括药物依从性、完成推荐的随访以及再次就诊急诊。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定 CTM-3 评分(百分制)与感兴趣的结局之间的关联。

结果

在联系的 1832 名患者中,有 576 名患者通过电话联系上,其中 410 名患者同意并完成了我们的调查,这代表了我们试图联系的患者的 22.4%的应答率。CTM-3 评分每增加 10 分(护理体验更好),急诊再次就诊的几率就会降低 12%(调整后的优势比 [AOR] = 0.88,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.77-1.00),而遵医嘱服药的几率会增加 45%(AOR = 1.45,95% CI = 1.12-1.87)。CTM-3 评分与完成随访之间没有关联。

结论

CTM-3 与急诊就诊后的护理结局相关,包括急诊再次就诊和药物依从性,并且可能作为急诊过渡护理的患者报告衡量工具具有一定的效用。

相似文献

1
Capturing Emergency Department Discharge Quality With the Care Transitions Measure: A Pilot Study.用护理转接测量法捕获急诊科出院质量:一项试点研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):605-609. doi: 10.1111/acem.13623. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
The Care Transitions Measure-3 Is Only Weakly Associated with Post-discharge Outcomes: a Retrospective Cohort Study in 48,384 Albertans.《护理转衔测量-3 仅与出院后结局弱相关:艾伯塔省 48384 例患者的回顾性队列研究》
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2497-2504. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05260-8. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
3
Do post discharge phone calls improve care transitions? A cluster-randomized trial.出院后电话随访能否改善护理转接?一项整群随机试验。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 11;9(11):e112230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112230. eCollection 2014.
4
Patient Uncertainty as a Predictor of 30-day Return Emergency Department Visits: An Observational Study.患者不确定性作为 30 天内返回急诊就诊的预测指标:一项观察性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May;26(5):501-509. doi: 10.1111/acem.13621. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
5
Telephone follow-up to reduce unplanned hospital returns for older emergency department patients: A randomized trial.电话随访以减少老年急诊科患者的非计划性医院返诊:一项随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Nov;69(11):3157-3166. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17336. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
6
Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Emergency Department Discharge Among Patients With Sepsis.脓毒症患者急诊出院的患病率、特征和结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147882. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47882.
7
A randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a paramedic-delivered care transitions intervention to reduce emergency department revisits.一项随机对照试验测试了由护理人员实施的护理交接干预措施减少急诊复诊的效果。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 3;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0792-5.
8
Patient nonadherence to filling discharge medication prescriptions from the emergency department: Barriers and clinical implications.患者不依从急诊科出院用药处方的情况:障碍与临床意义。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Mar 1;75(5):316-320. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170198.
9
Patients' views on the quality of transitional care at a health insurance hospital in Alexandria, Egypt.埃及亚历山大一家医疗保险医院的患者对过渡性护理质量的看法。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2014 Aug;89(2):74-80. doi: 10.1097/01.EPX.0000452045.65890.65.
10
A randomized trial exploring the effect of a telephone call follow-up on care plan compliance among older adults discharged home from the emergency department.一项随机试验,旨在探索电话随访对从急诊科出院回家的老年患者护理计划依从性的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(2):188-95. doi: 10.1111/acem.12308.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the gaps: A comprehensive, equity-focused observational examination of Emergency Department discharge.揭示差距:一项针对急诊科出院情况的全面、关注公平性的观察性调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0331226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331226. eCollection 2025.
2
Scoping Review of Adult Emergency Department Discharge Interventions.成人急诊科出院干预措施的范围综述
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 13;26(4):823-834. doi: 10.5811/westjem.35264.
3
Preparedness for care transitions to home and acute care use of skilled nursing facility patients.
熟练护理机构患者向家庭护理过渡及急性护理使用的准备情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05803-1.
4
Quality of Care Transition for COVID-19 Patients in a University Hospital in Southern Brazil.巴西南部一所大学附属医院 COVID-19 患者的护理交接质量。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Jun 28;77Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e20230402. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0402. eCollection 2024.
5
Quality of child and adolescent care transitions considering the presence of chronic disease.考虑到慢性病的存在,儿童和青少年护理过渡期的质量。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 May 29;76Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e20220347. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0347. eCollection 2023.
6
Continuity of care for children with chronic conditions: mixed methods research.慢性病儿童的连续性护理:混合方法研究。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023 Jan 16;56:e20220232. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0232en. eCollection 2023.
7
Patient experiences of a care transition intervention for Veterans to reduce emergency department visits.患者对退伍军人护理转接干预措施的体验,以减少急诊就诊次数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):388-397. doi: 10.1111/acem.14661. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
8
Association Between In-Person vs Telehealth Follow-up and Rates of Repeated Hospital Visits Among Patients Seen in the Emergency Department.门诊患者门诊随访方式(现场或远程)与再次就诊率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2237783. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37783.
9
Quality of transitional care of children with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study.慢性病患儿过渡期护理质量:一项横断面研究。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Apr 8;56:e20210535. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0535. eCollection 2022.
10
A Scoping Review of Emergency Department Discharge Risk Stratification.急诊科出院风险分层的范围综述
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep 23;22(6):1218-1226. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.6.52969.