Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
University of N'Djamena, N'Djamena, Chad.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0203647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203647. eCollection 2018.
Following a period of interruption of Gavi's funds for health system strengthening (HSS) in Cameroon and Chad, the two countries reprogramed their HSS grants. To implement the reprogrammed HSS, Chad committed to better management of the funds. Cameroon chose to channel the HSS funds through one of the health partners. This process is new to Gavi's HSS grants, and little is known about its effectiveness or characteristics. We investigated the advantages and disadvantages of this process to inform the global health community about the added value of this solution.
We retrospectively evaluated Gavi's HSS programs in Cameroon and Chad through a mixed methodology. To explore the pros and cons of channeling the funds through a health partner, we triangulated data from document review, key informant interviews (KIIs), field visits, and financial analysis of HSS expenditures in both countries.
Data triangulated from multiple sources showed that channeling HSS funds thorugh a health partner in Cameroon allowed compliance with budget, the development of a stronger accounting system at the Ministry of Health (MOH), and a rigid monitoring system. However, this mechanism delayed implementation by six months, accounted for 15% of the total cost, and created a tension around roles between MOH and the health partner. Achievement of program's output indicators was average. In Chad, expenditures complied with budget as well. However, implementation was delayed longer causing a second reprogramming of the funds. While the program had fewer output indicators in Chad, these were minimally achieved.
To our knowledge, this is the first study of channeling Gavi HSS funds through a health partner. This new process contributed to a higher level of implementation, stronger monitoring, and strengthened accountability in Cameroon. Recipient countries of Gavi HSS grants who lack the financial management capacity can benefit from a similar process.
在加维中断对喀麦隆和乍得卫生系统强化(HSS)资金支持一段时间后,两国重新规划了其 HSS 赠款。为了实施重新规划的 HSS,乍得承诺更好地管理资金。喀麦隆选择通过一个卫生合作伙伴渠道 HSS 资金。这一过程对于加维的 HSS 赠款来说是新的,其有效性或特点鲜为人知。我们调查了这一过程的优缺点,以便向全球卫生界介绍这一解决方案的附加值。
我们通过混合方法回顾性评估了喀麦隆和乍得的加维 HSS 计划。为了探索通过卫生合作伙伴渠道资金的优缺点,我们对两国的文件审查、关键知情人访谈(KII)、实地考察和 HSS 支出的财务分析进行了三角分析。
来自多个来源的数据三角分析表明,在喀麦隆通过卫生合作伙伴渠道 HSS 资金允许遵守预算,在卫生部(MOH)发展更强大的会计系统,并建立严格的监测系统。然而,这一机制使实施推迟了六个月,占总成本的 15%,并在 MOH 和卫生合作伙伴之间造成了角色紧张。项目产出指标的实现情况一般。在乍得,支出也符合预算。然而,实施被推迟了更长时间,导致资金的第二次重新规划。尽管乍得的产出指标较少,但这些指标都得到了最低限度的实现。
据我们所知,这是第一项通过卫生合作伙伴渠道加维 HSS 资金的研究。这一新过程有助于提高喀麦隆的实施水平、加强监测和加强问责制。缺乏财务管理能力的加维 HSS 赠款接受国可以从类似的过程中受益。