Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Sep 27;190(10):612. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6986-7.
In the present study, organismic-level acute toxicology profile of three reactive azo dyes, viz. Reactive Blue 221, Reactive Red 195, and Reactive Yellow 145, was investigated, by using bacterial (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus subtilis), fungal (Trichoderma asperellum, Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium fujikuroi, and Rhizoctonia solani), plant (Raphanus sativus, Triticum aestivum, Sorghum bicolor, and Phaseolus mungo), and aquatic (Artemia salina and Daphnia magna) specimens. Microbial test organisms (all the six bacteria and two fungi, i.e., T. asperellum and A. flavus) and D. magna were found to be relatively more sensitive towards the reactive azo dyes and their mixture, as the EC50 values were in the range of 80-330, 135-360, and 108-242 ppm for bacteria, fungi, and D. magna, respectively (but the effect was not acutely toxic). Moreover, the effect of dye mixture was comparable tothe individual dyes in almost all the tested microbial specimens. For plant seeds, the dye mixture was found to be relatively more inhibitory towards T. aestivum and R. sativus than the individual dyes. For S. bicolor and P. mungo seeds, the effect of the dye mixture was almost identical to the individual dyes. However, in all cases, EC50 values were in the range of 950-3500 ppm, which indicates a non-toxic effect on plant seed germination potential. Likewise, the dyes and their mixture were not acutely toxic for Artemia salina larvae (more sensitive to the dye mixture) and Daphnia magna neonates (EC50, 516-950 and 108-242 ppm, respectively).
在本研究中,使用细菌(铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、单核细胞增生李斯特菌和枯草芽孢杆菌)、真菌(aspergillus flavus、黄曲霉、藤仓镰刀菌和立枯丝核菌)、植物(萝卜、小麦、高粱和绿豆)和水生生物(卤虫和水蚤)标本,研究了三种反应性偶氮染料,即反应性蓝 221、反应性红 195 和反应性黄 145 的机体水平急性毒理学特征。微生物测试生物(所有六种细菌和两种真菌,即aspergillus flavus 和 T. asperellum)和水蚤被发现对反应性偶氮染料及其混合物相对更敏感,因为细菌、真菌和水蚤的 EC50 值分别在 80-330、135-360 和 108-242ppm 范围内(但效果不是急性毒性)。此外,在几乎所有测试的微生物标本中,染料混合物的作用与单独染料的作用相当。对于植物种子,染料混合物对小麦和萝卜的抑制作用比对单独染料更明显。对于高粱和绿豆种子,染料混合物的作用几乎与单独染料相同。然而,在所有情况下,EC50 值都在 950-3500ppm 范围内,这表明对植物种子发芽潜力没有毒性作用。同样,染料及其混合物对卤虫幼虫(对染料混合物更敏感)和水蚤无节幼体(EC50 值分别为 516-950ppm 和 108-242ppm)也没有急性毒性。