• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[酒精依赖严重程度问卷:土耳其语版本的效度与信度]

[Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version].

作者信息

Akyel Betül, Aldemir Ebru, Altıntoprak Ayşe Ender

出版信息

Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2018 Fall;29(3):202-208.

PMID:30260466
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to determine the validity and reliability of Turkish version of Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire (SADQ) developed by Tim Stockwell and colleagues in 1983 for the purpose of evaluating the severity of dependence in people with alcohol use disorder.

METHOD

The present study was conducted with an adult sample of 200 participants with alcohol use disorder according to DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) who applied to Ege University Institute on Drug Abuse, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science. Regarding validity analysis, item-total score correlation coefficients and principal component analysis were calculated. The scale was compared with Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST). Reliability analysis was performed with internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Considering the internal consistency reliability of scale, Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Coefficient was found to be α=0.914. Item and Total Score Correlation Coefficients of the scale items were found between 0.309 and 0.730 (p<0.01). The mean test-retest scores of the scale and its sub-dimensions were calculated with t-test for dependent groups and the difference was not statistically significant. Testretest correlation coefficient of the scale was found 0.855 (p<0.01). Exploratory factor analysis explained 70.5% of the total variance and four sub-dimensions were identified. Factor loadings of these sub-dimensions were estimated between 0.49-0.91. The correlation between SADQ and MAST was statistically significant (r=0.557, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the Turkish version of the SADQ with four sub-dimensions is a reliable and valid instrument in determining severity of alcohol dependence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定蒂姆·斯托克韦尔及其同事于1983年编制的酒精依赖严重程度问卷(SADQ)土耳其语版本在评估酒精使用障碍患者依赖严重程度方面的有效性和可靠性。

方法

本研究以200名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)的酒精使用障碍成年患者为样本,这些患者均前往伊兹密尔埃杰大学药物滥用、毒理学与制药科学研究所就诊。在效度分析方面,计算了项目 - 总分相关系数并进行了主成分分析。该量表与密歇根酒精ism筛查测试(MAST)进行了比较。采用内部一致性信度和重测信度进行信度分析。

结果

考虑量表的内部一致性信度,克朗巴哈α信度系数为α = 0.914。量表各项目的项目与总分相关系数在0.309至0.730之间(p < 0.01)。采用配对样本t检验计算了量表及其子维度的重测平均得分,差异无统计学意义。量表的重测相关系数为0.855(p < 0.01)。探索性因子分析解释了总方差的70.5%,并确定了四个子维度。这些子维度的因子载荷估计在0.49 - 0.91之间。SADQ与MAST之间的相关性具有统计学意义(r = 0.557,p < 0.01)。

结论

本研究结果表明,具有四个子维度的SADQ土耳其语版本在确定酒精依赖严重程度方面是一种可靠且有效的工具。

相似文献

1
[Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version].[酒精依赖严重程度问卷:土耳其语版本的效度与信度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2018 Fall;29(3):202-208.
2
Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.土耳其偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)问卷的效度和信度。
Headache. 2004 Sep;44(8):786-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04146.x.
3
Reliability and Validity of Turkish version of DSM-5 Substance Use Scale.DSM-5 物质使用量表土耳其语版本的信度和效度。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2024 Fall;35(3):225-233. doi: 10.5080/u26697.
4
The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with cancer.西黑文耶鲁多维疼痛量表:土耳其语版本在癌症患者中的信度和效度
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the DSM-5 Dissociative Symptoms Severity Scale-Child Form.DSM-5 分离症状严重程度量表儿童版土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2017 Jul-Sep;18(4):624-634. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2016.1252000. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
Turkish adaptation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score and its validity and reliability.盆腔器官脱垂症状评分的土耳其语改编版及其有效性和可靠性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Aug;28(8):1217-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3251-x. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
8
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms.土耳其版患者健康问卷躯体、焦虑和抑郁症状的心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.慢性非恶性疼痛患者简短疼痛问卷简表土耳其语版本的效度和信度
Agri. 2019 Nov;31(4):195-201. doi: 10.14744/agri.2019.25901.
10
Reliability and Validity of a Turkish version of the Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.土耳其语版产前母乳喂养自我效能量表的信效度
Midwifery. 2018 Sep;64:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Coping Among Spouses of Persons With Alcohol Use Disorder at a General Hospital Psychiatry Unit De-addiction Center: A Cross-Sectional Study.综合医院精神科戒毒中心酒精使用障碍患者配偶应对方式的横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 May 15;16(5):e60317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60317. eCollection 2024 May.