Roth Joshua A, Sullivan Sean D, Lin Vincent W, Bansal Aasthaa, Purdum Anna G, Navale Lynn, Cheng Paul, Ramsey Scott D
a Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Institute , Seattle , WA , USA.
b Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics Institute, School of Pharmacy , University of Washington , Seattle , WA , USA.
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1238-1245. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1529674. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was recently approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) following two or more prior therapies. As the first CAR T-cell therapy available for adults in the US, there are important questions about clinical and economic value. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel compared to salvage chemotherapy using a decision model and a US payer perspective.
A decision model was developed to estimate life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and lifetime cost for adult patients with R/R LBCL treated with axi-cel vs salvage chemotherapy (R-DHAP). Patient-level analyses of the ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 studies were used to inform the model and to estimate the proportion achieving long-term survival. Drug and procedure costs were derived from US average sales prices and Medicare reimbursement schedules. Future healthcare costs in long-term remission was derived from per capita Medicare spending. Utility values were derived from patient-level data from ZUMA-1 and external literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated uncertainty. Outcomes were calculated over a lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3% per year.
In the base case, LYs, QALYs, and lifetime costs were 9.5, 7.7, and $552,921 for axi-cel vs 2.6, 1.1, and $172,737 for salvage chemotherapy, respectively. The axi-cel cost per QALY gained was $58,146. Cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to the fraction achieving long-term remission, discount rate, and axi-cel price. The likelihood that axi-cel is cost-effective was 95% at a willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY.
Axi-cel is a potentially cost-effective alternative to salvage chemotherapy for adults with R/R LBCL. Long-term follow-up is necessary to reduce uncertainties about health outcomes.
阿基仑赛注射液(axi-cel)最近被批准用于治疗经过两种或更多种先前疗法后的复发或难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)。作为美国首个可供成人使用的CAR T细胞疗法,其临床和经济价值存在重要问题。本研究的目的是从美国医保支付方的角度,使用决策模型评估axi-cel与挽救性化疗相比的成本效益。
开发了一个决策模型,以估计接受axi-cel治疗与挽救性化疗(R-DHAP)的R/R LBCL成年患者的生命年(LYs)、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和终身成本。对ZUMA-1和SCHOLAR-1研究进行患者层面分析,为模型提供信息并估计实现长期生存的比例。药物和治疗费用来自美国平均销售价格和医疗保险报销时间表。长期缓解期的未来医疗费用来自人均医疗保险支出。效用值来自ZUMA-1的患者层面数据和外部文献。单向和概率敏感性分析评估不确定性。结果在终身范围内计算,并按每年3%进行贴现。
在基础病例中,axi-cel组的LYs、QALYs和终身成本分别为9.5、7.7和552,921美元,而挽救性化疗组分别为2.6、1.1和172,737美元。axi-cel每获得一个QALY的成本为58,146美元。成本效益对实现长期缓解的比例、贴现率和axi-cel价格最为敏感。在每QALY支付意愿为100,000美元时,axi-cel具有成本效益的可能性为95%。
对于患有R/R LBCL的成人,axi-cel是挽救性化疗的一种潜在成本效益替代方案。需要进行长期随访以减少健康结果方面的不确定性。