• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法治疗复发性或难治性成人弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本效果分析。

Cost Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Multiply Relapsed or Refractory Adult Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

机构信息

1Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA.

2Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 20;37(24):2105-2119. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02079. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.18.02079
PMID:31157579
Abstract

PURPOSE

Two anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are approved for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel; each costs $373,000. We evaluated their cost effectiveness.

METHODS

We used a decision analytic Markov model informed by recent multicenter, single-arm trials to evaluate axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel in multiply relapsed/refractory, adult, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from a US health payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Under a range of plausible long-term effectiveness assumptions, each therapy was compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy regimens and stem-cell transplantation. Main outcomes were undiscounted life years, discounted lifetime costs, discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (3% annual discount rate). Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty.

RESULTS

In an optimistic scenario, assuming a 40% 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), axi-cel increased life expectancy by 8.2 years at $129,000/QALY gained (95% uncertainty interval, $90,000 to $219,000). At a 30% 5-year PFS, improvements in life expectancy were more modest (6.4 years) and expensive ($159,000/QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, $105,000 to $284,000]). In an optimistic scenario, assuming a 35% 5-year PFS, tisagenlecleucel increased life expectancy by 4.6 years at $168,000/QALY gained (95% uncertainty interval, $105,000 to $414,000/QALY). At a 25% 5-year PFS, improvements in life expectancy were smaller (3.4 years) and more expensive ($223,000/QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, $123,000 to $1,170,000/QALY]). Administering CAR-T to all indicated patients would increase US health care costs by approximately $10 billion over 5 years. Price reductions to $250,000 and $200,000, respectively, or payment only for initial complete response (at current prices) would allow axi-cel and tisagenlecleucel to cost less than $150,000/QALY, even at 25% PFS.

CONCLUSION

At 2018 prices, it is possible that both CAR-T therapies meet a less than $150,000/QALY threshold. This depends on long-term outcomes compared with chemoimmunotherapy and stem-cell transplantation, which are uncertain. Widespread adoption would substantially increase non-Hodgkin lymphoma health care costs. Price reductions or payment for initial response would improve cost effectiveness, even with modest long-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

两种抗 CD19 嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)疗法已被批准用于弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤,即 axi-cel 和 tisagenlecleucel;每种疗法的费用均为 37.3 万美元。我们评估了它们的成本效益。

方法

我们使用基于最近多中心、单臂试验的决策分析马尔可夫模型,从美国医保支付者的角度,在终生范围内评估了axi-cel 和 tisagenlecleucel 在多次复发/难治性成人弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的应用。在一系列合理的长期有效性假设下,每种疗法均与挽救性化疗免疫疗法方案和干细胞移植进行了比较。主要结果为无贴现寿命年、贴现寿命年成本、贴现质量调整寿命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(3%的年度贴现率)。敏感性分析探讨了不确定性。

结果

在乐观情况下,假设 5 年无进展生存率(PFS)为 40%,axi-cel 可使预期寿命延长 8.2 年,每 QALY 增加 129,000 美元(95%不确定区间为 90,000 美元至 219,000 美元)。在 30%的 5 年 PFS 假设下,对预期寿命的改善较为温和(6.4 年)且费用昂贵(每 QALY 增加 159,000 美元[95%不确定区间为 105,000 美元至 284,000 美元])。在乐观情况下,假设 5 年 PFS 为 35%,tisagenlecleucel 可使预期寿命延长 4.6 年,每 QALY 增加 168,000 美元(95%不确定区间为 105,000 美元至 414,000 美元)。在 25%的 5 年 PFS 假设下,对预期寿命的改善较小(3.4 年)且费用更高(每 QALY 增加 223,000 美元[95%不确定区间为 123,000 美元至 1,170,000 美元])。在 5 年内,向所有符合条件的患者使用 CAR-T 治疗将使美国医疗保健费用增加约 100 亿美元。分别将价格降至 25 万美元和 20 万美元,或仅对初始完全缓解(按现行价格)进行支付,将使 axi-cel 和 tisagenlecleucel 的成本低于 15 万美元/QALY,即使在 PFS 为 25%的情况下也是如此。

结论

按照 2018 年的价格,这两种 CAR-T 疗法都有可能低于 15 万美元/QALY 的阈值。这取决于与化疗免疫疗法和干细胞移植相比的长期结果,而这些结果是不确定的。广泛采用将会大幅增加非霍奇金淋巴瘤的医疗保健费用。降低价格或仅对初始反应进行支付,即使在长期结果较为温和的情况下,也能提高成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Multiply Relapsed or Refractory Adult Large B-Cell Lymphoma.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法治疗复发性或难治性成人弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本效果分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 20;37(24):2105-2119. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02079. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
2
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the United States.在美国,阿基仑赛注射液用于复发或难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤成年患者的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1238-1245. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1529674. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry.基于真实世界法国登记数据的阿基仑赛与Tisagenlecleucel 治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本-效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4282-4298. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02971-1. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
4
Cost effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus tisagenlecleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the United States.在美国,对于接受过两线或以上系统治疗后复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成年患者,与 tisagenlecleucel 相比,axicabtagene ciloleucel 的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):458-468. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1901721.
5
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of 3L + relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the United States: incorporating longer survival results.在美国,阿基仑赛注射液与替雷利珠单抗注射液治疗3L+复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益:纳入更长生存结果
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):230-239. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2305558. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel as Second-line or Later Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.阿基仑赛和Tisagenlecleucel 作为二线或更后线治疗复发或难治弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2245956. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45956.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: No Impact of Site of Care.嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法治疗复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的成本效益:治疗地点无影响。
Adv Ther. 2022 Aug;39(8):3560-3577. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02188-0. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
8
Cost-effectiveness of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.二线 axicabtagene ciloleucel 在复发难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的成本效益。
Blood. 2022 Nov 10;140(19):2024-2036. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016747.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs. salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China.在中国,对于复发或难治性成人弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤,axicabtagene ciloleucel 与挽救性化疗的成本效益分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):6113-6121. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07041-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Cost-effectiveness of treating relapsed or refractory 3L+ follicular lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel vs mosunetuzumab in the United States.在美国,用 axicabtagene ciloleucel 治疗复发/难治性 3L+滤泡性淋巴瘤与 mosunetuzumab 的成本效益比较。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 24;15:1393939. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393939. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge-map and bibliometric analysis of scientific research on FDA-approved Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell products (2015-2024).美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的嵌合抗原受体T细胞产品的科学研究知识图谱与文献计量分析(2015 - 2024年)
Discov Oncol. 2025 Aug 3;16(1):1461. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03360-y.
2
Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased in-hospitality mortality during Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy hospitalizations: a retrospective cohort study in the United States.嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法住院期间,心房颤动与住院死亡率增加相关:美国一项回顾性队列研究。
Cardiooncology. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40959-025-00334-5.
3
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treatment Pathways in the United States.
美国弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗途径的成本效益分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jun 25;10(1):23814683251345780. doi: 10.1177/23814683251345780. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
CAR-T cell therapy in older adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL: benefits and challenges.老年复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的CAR-T细胞疗法:益处与挑战
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;13(6):e009793. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009793.
5
Allogeneic NK cells with a bispecific innate cell engager in refractory relapsed lymphoma: a phase 1 trial.同种异体自然杀伤细胞联合双特异性天然细胞衔接子治疗难治性复发淋巴瘤:一项1期试验
Nat Med. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03640-8.
6
Is first-line treatment with polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) for previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cost-effective in China? A cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model.对于先前未经治疗的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤,使用泊洛妥珠单抗维达替尼-利妥昔单抗-环磷酰胺、多柔比星和泼尼松(pola-R-CHP)进行一线治疗在中国是否具有成本效益?一项使用马尔可夫模型的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e086251. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086251.
7
Advances in the understanding and therapeutic manipulation of cancer immune responsiveness: a Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) review.癌症免疫反应性的理解与治疗性调控进展:癌症免疫治疗学会(SITC)综述
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Jan 16;13(1):e008876. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-008876.
8
Advances in engineering nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging (MPI).用于磁粒子成像(MPI)的工程纳米粒子的进展。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jan 10;11(2):eado7356. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado7356. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
9
Allogeneic CAR-T cells for cancer immunotherapy.异体基因修饰的 CAR-T 细胞疗法在癌症免疫治疗中的应用。
Immunotherapy. 2024;16(16-17):1079-1090. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2024.2408048. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
10
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry.基于真实世界法国登记数据的阿基仑赛与Tisagenlecleucel 治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本-效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4282-4298. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02971-1. Epub 2024 Sep 24.