• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿基仑赛注射液与西班牙复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤二线治疗标准疗法的成本效益分析

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Standard of Care in Second-Line Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain.

作者信息

Martín García-Sancho Alejandro, Presa María, Pardo Carlos, Martín-Escudero Victoria, Oyagüez Itziar, Ortiz-Maldonado Valentín

机构信息

Haematology Department, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), CIBERONC, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.

Health Economics Department, Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), 28224 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 22;16(13):2301. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132301.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16132301
PMID:39001364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11240757/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel vs. salvage immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT+ASCT) for responders to second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).

METHODS

A partitioned survival mixture-cure model comprising three health states was used to estimate the costs, life years gained (LYG), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accumulated over a lifetime horizon. Overall survival, event-free survival, and time to the next treatment with axi-cel and HDT+ASCT were derived from the ZUMA-7 study. The total costs (EUR, 2022) included drug acquisition and administration, ASCT, subsequent treatment, disease and adverse event management, and palliative care. The unitary costs were derived from local databases and the literature. A 3% discount rate was applied to the costs and outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared with HDT+ASCT, axi-cel provided higher LYG per patient (10.00 vs. 8.28 LYG/patient) and greater QALYs gained per patient (7.85 vs. 6.04 QALY/patient). The lifetime total costs were 343,581 EUR/patient with axi-cel vs. 257,994 EUR/patient with IQT+ASCT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of axi-cel vs. HDT+ASCT was 49,627 EUR/LYG, and the incremental cost-utility ratio was 47,309 EUR/QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model.

CONCLUSION

Axi-cel is a potentially cost-effective alternative to HDT+ASCT for the treatment of R/R DLBCL in Spain.

摘要

目的

评估axi-cel与挽救性免疫化疗联合大剂量化疗及自体干细胞移植(HDT+ASCT)用于复发/难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)二线治疗缓解者的成本效益。

方法

采用包含三种健康状态的分区生存混合治愈模型,以估计终生范围内累积的成本、获得的生命年(LYG)和质量调整生命年(QALY)。axi-cel和HDT+ASCT的总生存、无事件生存以及下次治疗时间来自ZUMA-7研究。总成本(2022年欧元)包括药物采购与给药、ASCT、后续治疗、疾病及不良事件管理以及姑息治疗。单位成本来自本地数据库和文献。对成本和结果应用3%的贴现率。

结果

与HDT+ASCT相比,axi-cel每位患者获得更高的LYG(10.00 vs. 8.28 LYG/患者)和更多的QALY(7.85 vs. 6.04 QALY/患者)。axi-cel的终生总成本为343,581欧元/患者,而HDT+ASCT为257,994欧元/患者。axi-cel与HDT+ASCT相比的增量成本效益比为49,627欧元/LYG,增量成本效用比为47,309欧元/QALY。敏感性分析证实了模型的稳健性。

结论

在西班牙,对于R/R DLBCL的治疗,axi-cel是HDT+ASCT潜在的成本效益替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/7b3879a15bce/cancers-16-02301-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/942664198837/cancers-16-02301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/a43750b58d7f/cancers-16-02301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/02d1b26abe18/cancers-16-02301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/7b3879a15bce/cancers-16-02301-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/942664198837/cancers-16-02301-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/a43750b58d7f/cancers-16-02301-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/02d1b26abe18/cancers-16-02301-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9543/11240757/7b3879a15bce/cancers-16-02301-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Standard of Care in Second-Line Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain.阿基仑赛注射液与西班牙复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤二线治疗标准疗法的成本效益分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 22;16(13):2301. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132301.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Tisagenlecleucel for the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain.阿基仑赛与替雷利珠单抗治疗西班牙复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;14(3):538. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030538.
3
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the United States.在美国,阿基仑赛注射液用于复发或难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤成年患者的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1238-1245. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1529674. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus tisagenlecleucel for the treatment of 3L + relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the United States: incorporating longer survival results.在美国,阿基仑赛注射液与替雷利珠单抗注射液治疗3L+复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益:纳入更长生存结果
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):230-239. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2305558. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
5
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus lisocabtagene maraleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the US.在美国,对于经过二线或多线系统性治疗后复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成年患者,与 lisocabtagene maraleucel 相比,axicabtagene ciloleucel 的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):541-551. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2065787.
6
The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.在美国,阿基仑赛二线治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益:ZUMA-7 试验的经济学评价。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Nov;28(11):750.e1-750.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel as a second-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China and the United States.在中国和美国,阿基仑赛注射液作为弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤二线治疗的成本效益分析。
Ther Adv Hematol. 2023 May 23;14:20406207231168215. doi: 10.1177/20406207231168215. eCollection 2023.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel vs. salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China.在中国,对于复发或难治性成人弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤,axicabtagene ciloleucel 与挽救性化疗的成本效益分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):6113-6121. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07041-2. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
9
Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Dec;176(12):1625-1637. doi: 10.7326/M22-2276. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
10
Axicabtagene ciloleucel compared to standard of care in Swedish patients with large B-cell lymphoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ZUMA-7 trial.阿基卡宾赛利珠单抗与大 B 细胞淋巴瘤瑞典患者标准治疗的比较:ZUMA-7 试验的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1303-1317. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2260689. Epub 2023 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacoeconomic Profiles of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review.罕见病中先进治疗药物的药物经济学概况:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 2;13(15):1894. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151894.

本文引用的文献

1
Axicabtagene ciloleucel compared to standard of care in Swedish patients with large B-cell lymphoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ZUMA-7 trial.阿基卡宾赛利珠单抗与大 B 细胞淋巴瘤瑞典患者标准治疗的比较:ZUMA-7 试验的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1303-1317. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2260689. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
2
Survival with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.阿基仑赛治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的总生存。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 13;389(2):148-157. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301665. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
3
The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.
在美国,阿基仑赛二线治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益:ZUMA-7 试验的经济学评价。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Nov;28(11):750.e1-750.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
4
The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms.《世界卫生组织造血与淋巴组织肿瘤分类》第五版:淋巴肿瘤。
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1720-1748. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Tisagenlecleucel for the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain.阿基仑赛与替雷利珠单抗治疗西班牙复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;14(3):538. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030538.
6
Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma.阿基仑赛注射液二线治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):640-654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116133. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
7
Mixture Cure Models in Oncology: A Tutorial and Practical Guidance.肿瘤学中的混合治愈模型:教程与实践指南
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Jun;5(2):143-155. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00260-z. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
8
RELINF: prospective epidemiological registry of lymphoid neoplasms in Spain. A project from the GELTAMO group.RELINF:西班牙淋巴肿瘤的前瞻性流行病学注册研究。GELTAMO 小组的一个项目。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Apr;99(4):799-808. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-03918-6. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.抗 CD19 CAR T 细胞疗法治疗 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
Transfus Med Rev. 2020 Jan;34(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
10
[What is an efficient health intervention in Spain in 2020?].[2020年西班牙有效的健康干预措施是什么?]
Gac Sanit. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Sep 24.