Lindström Joakim, Henriksson Anders E
a Department of Laboratory Medicine , Sundsvall County Hospital , Sundsvall , Sweden.
b Department of Natural Sciences , Mid Sweden University , Sundsvall , Sweden.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018 Oct;78(6):524-526. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2018.1488178. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
Regular measurement of prothrombin time (PT) as an international normalized ratio (INR) is of great importance in ensuring a safe Warfarin treatment due to the narrow therapeutic range. Hence, accurate results of the PT/INR analysis are crucial. Due to the high sampling load that patients on Warfarin experience, some prefer capillary sampling (from the tip of the finger) as an alternative to standard venous sampling (from the cubital fossa). The present study evaluated the method of capillary sampling compared to the standard venous method for plasma PT/INR measurement. Both venous and capillary samples were collected simultaneously for plasma PT/INR testing from 100 patients of which the majority undergoing active Warfarin treatment. The samples were analyzed on a Sysmex 2100i instrument (Siemens) using the Owrens method with PT reagents from MediRox. The capillary sampling method showed statistically significant lower values (p < .001) for plasma PT/INR than the standard venous sampling method with a mean difference (bias) of -0.14. It is improbable that the difference (bias) between capillary and venous sampling for plasma PT/INR analysis has clinical relevance. However, since the capillary blood collection and handling for plasma PT/INR is more technically demanding than the standard venous method we recommended that only specially trained personnel be entrusted to draw capillary blood for plasma PT/INR analysis.
由于华法林治疗窗狭窄,定期测定凝血酶原时间(PT)作为国际标准化比值(INR)对于确保华法林治疗安全至关重要。因此,PT/INR分析的准确结果至关重要。鉴于服用华法林的患者采样负担较重,一些人倾向于采用毛细血管采样(从指尖)作为标准静脉采样(从肘窝)的替代方法。本研究评估了与标准静脉方法相比,用于血浆PT/INR测量的毛细血管采样方法。同时采集100例患者的静脉和毛细血管样本进行血浆PT/INR检测,其中大多数患者正在接受华法林的积极治疗。使用来自MediRox的PT试剂,采用奥伦氏法在Sysmex 2100i仪器(西门子)上对样本进行分析。毛细血管采样方法显示血浆PT/INR值在统计学上显著低于标准静脉采样方法,平均差异(偏差)为-0.14。血浆PT/INR分析中毛细血管采样和静脉采样之间的差异(偏差)不太可能具有临床相关性。然而,由于血浆PT/INR的毛细血管采血和处理在技术上比标准静脉方法要求更高,我们建议仅委托经过专门培训的人员采集毛细血管血用于血浆PT/INR分析。