• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床高危判定并不能预测胎儿-母体过量出血。

Clinical high-risk designation does not predict excess fetal-maternal hemorrhage.

作者信息

Ness P M, Baldwin M L, Niebyl J R

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):154-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90228-6.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(87)90228-6
PMID:3026183
Abstract

During a 5-year period, an enzyme-linked antiglobulin test was used to screen and quantitate fetal-maternal hemorrhage in 789 consecutive D-negative mothers who were delivered of D-positive babies. Six hundred seventy-two patients (85.2%) had no detectable fetal-maternal hemorrhage, and 117 patients (14.8%) had a detectable fetal-maternal hemorrhage. Eight of the 789 (1%) had a fetal-maternal hemorrhage greater than 30 ml and required more than one vial of Rh immune globulin. Two patients with fetal-maternal hemorrhage of 29 and 30 ml also received additional Rh immune globulin. Each case was reviewed for the presence of high-risk features that are thought to predict patients at risk for fetal-maternal hemorrhage. Patients having a cesarean section or complicated vaginal delivery were considered to be in a group at high risk for fetal-maternal hemorrhage, while those with a spontaneous vaginal delivery were considered not to be at risk for fetal-maternal hemorrhage. Thirty-two of 237 patients (13.5%) in the risk group and 82 of 552 patients (15.3%) in the group not at risk had detectable fetal-maternal hemorrhage. The incidence of fetal-maternal hemorrhage for these two groups was not statistically different (p greater than 0.50 by chi 2 analysis). If only patients in the risk group had been screened for fetal-maternal hemorrhage, then five of 10 (50%) who required more than one vial of Rh immune globulin would have been undertreated and at risk for developing anti-D antibodies. In addition, newborn birth weight, Apgar scores, and hematocrits were examined for 13 cases of fetal-maternal hemorrhage of greater than or equal to 21 ml, and none of these characteristics could be used to predict patients at risk for fetal-maternal hemorrhage. Therefore, no maternal or newborn characteristics could be identified that would reliably predict patients at risk for fetal-maternal hemorrhage. We conclude that all D-negative patients with D-positive babies should continue to be screened for fetal-maternal hemorrhage to identify those patients requiring more than one vial of Rh immune globulin.

摘要

在5年期间,采用酶联抗球蛋白试验对789例连续分娩出D阳性婴儿的D阴性母亲进行胎儿 - 母体出血的筛查和定量分析。672例患者(85.2%)未检测到胎儿 - 母体出血,117例患者(14.8%)检测到胎儿 - 母体出血。789例中有8例(1%)胎儿 - 母体出血量超过30 ml,需要使用超过1瓶Rh免疫球蛋白。2例胎儿 - 母体出血量分别为29 ml和30 ml的患者也接受了额外的Rh免疫球蛋白。对每例病例进行了高危特征检查,这些特征被认为可预测有胎儿 - 母体出血风险的患者。剖宫产或复杂阴道分娩的患者被视为胎儿 - 母体出血高危组,而自然阴道分娩的患者被认为无胎儿 - 母体出血风险。高危组的237例患者中有32例(13.5%)检测到胎儿 - 母体出血,非高危组的552例患者中有82例(15.3%)检测到胎儿 - 母体出血。这两组胎儿 - 母体出血的发生率无统计学差异(χ²分析p大于0.50)。如果仅对高危组患者进行胎儿 - 母体出血筛查,那么需要使用超过1瓶Rh免疫球蛋白的10例患者中有5例(50%)会治疗不足,有产生抗 - D抗体的风险。此外,对13例胎儿 - 母体出血量大于或等于21 ml的病例检查了新生儿出生体重、阿氏评分和血细胞比容,但这些特征均不能用于预测有胎儿 - 母体出血风险的患者。因此,无法确定可靠预测有胎儿 - 母体出血风险患者的母体或新生儿特征。我们得出结论,所有分娩出D阳性婴儿的D阴性患者都应继续进行胎儿 - 母体出血筛查,以识别那些需要使用超过1瓶Rh免疫球蛋白的患者。

相似文献

1
Clinical high-risk designation does not predict excess fetal-maternal hemorrhage.临床高危判定并不能预测胎儿-母体过量出血。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jan;156(1):154-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90228-6.
2
The assessment of fetal-maternal hemorrhage by an enzyme-linked antiglobulin test for Rh immune globulin recipients.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Aug 1;143(7):788-92. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90011-4.
3
Prevention of Rh alloimmunization.预防Rh血型同种免疫。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Sep;25(9):765-73. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31006-4.
4
Detection and quantitation of fetomaternal hemorrhage.母胎输血的检测与定量
South Med J. 1986 May;79(5):571-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198605000-00012.
5
Use of the erythrocyte rosette test to screen for excessive fetomaternal hemorrhage in Rh-negative women.应用红细胞玫瑰花结试验筛查Rh阴性女性的胎儿-母体过量出血。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jun;154(6):1363-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90725-8.
6
Prevention of Rh isoimmunization after spontaneous, massive fetomaternal hemorrhage.自发性大量胎儿-母体出血后Rh血型免疫的预防。
South Med J. 1996 Sep;89(9):911-4. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199609000-00014.
7
Fetal-Maternal Hemorrhage Detected by Sudden Disappearance of Rh Immune Globulin-Related Anti-D.通过Rh免疫球蛋白相关抗-D突然消失检测到的胎儿-母体出血
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1301-1302. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001013.
8
The incidence of significant fetomaternal hemorrhage in patients undergoing cesarean section.剖宫产患者中发生显著胎儿-母体出血的发生率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):855-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91083-o.
9
Controversies in Rh prophylaxis. Who needs Rh immune globulin and when should it be given?Rh 预防的争议。谁需要 Rh 免疫球蛋白以及何时应给予?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb 1;151(3):289-94. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90288-1.
10
On the immunologic basis of Rh immune globulin (anti-D) prophylaxis.关于Rh免疫球蛋白(抗-D)预防的免疫学基础。
Transfusion. 2006 Sep;46(9):1652-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00924_1.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for RhD immunisation in a high coverage prevention programme of antenatal and postnatal RhIg: a nationwide cohort study.高覆盖率预防产前和产后 RhIg 的 RhD 免疫风险因素:一项全国性队列研究。
BJOG. 2022 Sep;129(10):1721-1730. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17118. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn.胎儿和新生儿溶血病的预防与治疗建议。
Blood Transfus. 2015 Jan;13(1):109-34. doi: 10.2450/2014.0119-14.
3
Risk factors for RhD immunisation despite antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis.
尽管进行了产前和产后抗D预防,RhD免疫的危险因素。
BJOG. 2009 Sep;116(10):1307-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02244.x. Epub 2009 Jun 17.