Research Institute on Health Sciences.
Department of Psychology.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Nov;127(8):818-829. doi: 10.1037/abn0000375. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
This study (a) determined whether clinical elevations of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom distributions in a large community sample of children would allow for identifying SCT-only, ADHD-only, and SCT + ADHD clinical groups; (b) examined co-occurrence of clinically elevated SCT and ADHD; (c) evaluated whether these clinical groups differed in their gender distribution, co-occurring mental health symptoms, or impairment in academic and social functioning; and (d) explored patterns of independence and overlap when clinically elevated depressive symptoms were considered in tandem with SCT and ADHD. Participants were mothers, fathers, and teachers of 2,142 children (50.51% boys, ages 8-13 years) from 32 schools in Spain. All three groups of informants completed measures of SCT, ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), anxiety, depression, shyness, social impairment, and academic impairment. Cut-off scores for the top 5% of the sample were used to create SCT-only, ADHD-only, SCT + ADHD, and comparison groups. Across informants, 4.97%-5.53% met criteria for clinically elevated ADHD-only, and 2.30%-2.80% met criteria for clinically elevated SCT-only; 27%-35% of the ADHD group also met the criteria for the SCT group, whereas 44%-54% of the SCT group met the criteria for the ADHD group (primarily based on inattentive symptoms). The ADHD-only group had higher ODD scores than the SCT-only group, whereas the SCT-only group generally had higher shyness and internalizing scores (particularly depression) than the ADHD-only group. Additional analyses that also included clinically elevated depression revealed that 28-46% of the children with elevated SCT had elevations in ADHD depression. This study moves the field toward examining both the empirical and clinical differentiation of SCT and ADHD. Findings are discussed regarding how SCT may fit in diagnostic nosologies and models of psychopathology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
(a) 确定在一个大型社区儿童样本中,是否临床出现迟钝认知节奏(SCT)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状分布会有助于识别仅存在 SCT、仅存在 ADHD 以及 SCT 和 ADHD 共病的临床群体;(b) 研究临床显著的 SCT 和 ADHD 的共病情况;(c) 评估这些临床群体在性别分布、共病精神健康症状或在学业和社会功能方面的损害方面是否存在差异;以及(d) 当考虑到临床显著的抑郁症状与 SCT 和 ADHD 同时出现时,探索它们的独立性和重叠模式。参与者为来自西班牙 32 所学校的 2142 名儿童(50.51%为男孩,年龄 8-13 岁)的母亲、父亲和教师。所有三组知情者都完成了 SCT、ADHD、对立违抗性障碍(ODD)、焦虑、抑郁、害羞、社会功能障碍和学业功能障碍的测量。使用样本前 5%的最高分来创建仅存在 SCT、仅存在 ADHD、SCT 和 ADHD 共病以及对照组。在所有的知情者中,4.97%-5.53%符合临床显著 ADHD 仅存在的标准,2.30%-2.80%符合临床显著 SCT 仅存在的标准;ADHD 组中有 27%-35%的儿童也符合 SCT 组的标准,而 SCT 组中有 44%-54%的儿童符合 ADHD 组的标准(主要是基于注意力不集中的症状)。ADHD 组的 ODD 评分高于 SCT 组,而 SCT 组的害羞和内化症状(尤其是抑郁)评分通常高于 ADHD 组。还进行了包括临床显著抑郁的额外分析,结果表明,28-46%的 SCT 升高的儿童同时存在 ADHD 和抑郁的升高。这项研究推动了对 SCT 和 ADHD 的实证和临床区分的研究。讨论了如何将 SCT 纳入诊断分类学和精神病理学模型。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。