• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用钽皮质骨柱治疗感染性膝关节翻修中的严重骨缺损

The Use of Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for the Management of Severe Bone Defects in Septic Knee Revision.

机构信息

Orthopedic and Traumatology Unit 2, Santa Corona Hospital, Pietra Ligure, Savona, Italy.

Department of Surgical Sciences (DISC), Orthopaedic Clinic, Policlinico San Martino IST, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3739-3745. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.026
PMID:30266325
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Femoral and tibial massive bone defects are common findings in septic total knee revision and pose considerable challenges for the orthopedic surgeon. The aim of this study was to report the midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes with the use of tantalum cones for the management of massive bone defects after 2-stage knee revision.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 60 patients (mean age, 67.9 ± 8.8 years) treated with 94 tantalum cones associated with constrained or semiconstrained knee for massive bone loss (mean follow-up, 43.5 ± 17.4 months). In all cases, the indication was a staged revision for periprosthetic knee infection. Functional scores, radiographic outcomes, and implant survivorship were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score improved from 44.1 ± 7.4 and 19.2 ± 4.1 to 85.4 ± 5.6 and 38.4 ± 3.9 (P < .01), respectively. The mean flexion increased from 60.6° ± 15.5° to 96.8° ± 10.9° at the last evaluation (P < .01). The mean improvement in flexion contracture was 6.2 ± 8.0 (P < .01). Two failures (3.3%) due to periprosthetic knee infection recurrence were observed, but no cone-related mechanical failures were reported. The cone-related survival rate was 97.8%.

CONCLUSION

Excellent clinical and radiographic midterm outcomes were achieved with a low complication rate. Tantalum cones may be considered a safe and effective option in the management of massive bone defects also in septic knee revision surgery.

摘要

背景

感染性全膝关节翻修中常见股骨和胫骨大骨缺损,这给骨科医生带来了相当大的挑战。本研究旨在报告使用钽锥体治疗 2 期膝关节翻修后大量骨缺损的中期临床和影像学结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 60 例(平均年龄 67.9 ± 8.8 岁)患者的病历,这些患者因假体周围膝关节感染接受了 94 个钽锥体联合约束或半约束膝关节治疗大量骨丢失(平均随访 43.5 ± 17.4 个月)。所有病例的适应证均为分期翻修假体周围膝关节感染。分析了功能评分、影像学结果和植入物存活率。

结果

膝关节协会评分和牛津膝关节评分从 44.1 ± 7.4 和 19.2 ± 4.1 分别提高到 85.4 ± 5.6 和 38.4 ± 3.9(P <.01)。最后评估时,平均屈曲度从 60.6°±15.5°增加到 96.8°±10.9°(P <.01)。平均屈曲挛缩改善 6.2 ± 8.0(P <.01)。观察到 2 例(3.3%)因假体周围膝关节感染复发而失败,但未报告与锥体相关的机械故障。锥体相关的存活率为 97.8%。

结论

在感染性膝关节翻修手术中,使用钽锥体治疗大量骨缺损可获得良好的中期临床和影像学结果,并发症发生率低。钽锥体可被视为一种安全有效的选择。

相似文献

1
The Use of Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for the Management of Severe Bone Defects in Septic Knee Revision.使用钽皮质骨柱治疗感染性膝关节翻修中的严重骨缺损
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3739-3745. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.多孔钽皮质骨骨柱用于翻修全膝关节置换术严重股骨和胫骨骨缺损的固定,在平均 5 年随访时是可靠的。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S374-S379. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
3
Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.使用小梁钽锥体进行全膝关节置换翻修术:来自两个中心的51例患者的初步回顾性研究,最短随访2年。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Jun;102(4):429-33. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.钽锥体为翻修全膝关节置换术提供持久的中期固定。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3176-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4338-2. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.在严重骨缺损的翻修膝关节置换术中,钽金属杯的中期至长期效果良好。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5496-5506. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07593-8. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
6
Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?多孔钽皮质骨内芯在翻修全膝关节置换术中是否能改善疗效?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.033. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
7
Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.多孔钽皮质骨骨缺损填充器治疗膝关节翻修术严重胫骨骨缺损:5 至 9 年随访结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 4;97(3):216-23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00540.
8
Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves.感染性翻修全膝关节置换术:使用干骺端套简治疗干骺端骨缺损。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3734-3738. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
9
Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.钽股骨锥在翻修全膝关节置换术中的早期应用结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):478-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01322.
10
Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.铰链膝关节和钽杯在至少 10 年随访中的无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术的临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3018-3022. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.057. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cone Stacked on a Cone Within a Cone: A Technique for Reconstructing Proximal Third Tibial Shaft Fractures During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.圆锥套圆锥置于圆锥内:全膝关节置换翻修术中重建胫骨近端三分之一骨干骨折的技术。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jul 8;34:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101762. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Unveiling the link: highly porous tantalum-augmented implants and periprosthetic joint infection in revision total knee arthroplasty-a systematic review and meta-analysis.揭示关联:高度多孔钽增强型植入物与翻修全膝关节置换术中假体周围关节感染——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 24;26(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08640-w.
3
Unbalanced metaphyseal fixation is associated with an increased aseptic loosening of revision total knee arthroplasty at mean 4-year follow-up.
在平均 4 年的随访中,非平衡干骺端固定与翻修全膝关节置换术后的无菌性松动增加有关。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec;144(12):5293-5299. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05600-2. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
4
Total knee arthroplasty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a narrative review.前交叉韧带重建术后全膝关节置换术:一项叙述性综述
Ann Jt. 2024 May 20;9:25. doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-62. eCollection 2024.
5
Biomechanical analysis of patient specific cone vs conventional stem in revision total knee arthroplasty.患者特定锥形与传统柄在翻修全膝关节置换中的生物力学分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 27;19(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04936-0.
6
John N. Insall Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Components: Durable and Reliable at a Mean 10-Years Follow-Up.约翰·N·英萨尔奖:非骨水泥与骨水泥固定胫骨组件的随机临床试验:10 年平均随访结果显示具有持久性和可靠性。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S14-S20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.015. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
Tibial metaphyseal cones combined with short stems perform as well as long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty.胫骨干骺端圆锥结合短柄在翻修全膝关节置换术中的表现与长柄一样好。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Sep;92(9):2254-2260. doi: 10.1111/ans.17864. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
8
Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results.单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的两阶段翻修术:临床及影像学结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):2031-2038. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04464-8. Epub 2022 May 19.
9
Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Tibial Bone Defects Using Patient-Customized Three-Dimensional-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.在翻修全膝关节置换术中,使用患者定制的三维打印干骺端锥形物重建巨大的胫骨近端骨缺损。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun;14(6):1071-1077. doi: 10.1111/os.13282. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Two-stage arthroplasty for septic arthritis of the hip and knee: A systematic review on infection control and clinical functional outcomes.髋膝关节化脓性关节炎的两阶段关节置换术:关于感染控制和临床功能结局的系统评价
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Nov 30;24:101720. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101720. eCollection 2022 Jan.