Doke Kaleigh, Butler Shirley, Mitchell Melissa P
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Kansas University Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Mailstop 4033, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2018 Dec;23(4):279-291. doi: 10.1007/s10911-018-9415-1. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
Treatment for ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) has historically been extrapolated from studies of invasive breast cancer. Accepted local therapy approaches range from small local excisions, with or without radiation, to bilateral mastectomies. Systemic treatment with endocrine therapy is often recommended for hormone positive patients. With improvements in imaging, pathologic review, and treatment techniques in the modern era, combined with new information regarding tumor biology, the management of DCIS is rapidly evolving. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment is now more important than ever, with a shift towards de-escalating therapy to reduce treatment related toxicity. This review focuses on nuances of clinical management of DCIS in the modern era, highlighting key differences between DCIS as compared to invasive breast cancer. The American Cancer Society (ACS) currently recommends beginning screening with annual mammograms for women age 45, with the option to start at age 40. As treatment of DCIS has not been shown to impact survival, the USPSTF has more conservative screening recommendations of biennial mammograms from age 50-74. Unlike invasive breast cancer, DCIS is almost exclusively diagnosed by mammographic detection, and lymph node evaluation is not recommended. Pathologic review of biopsy specimens should follow the guidelines of the College of American Pathologists. Surgical management options include breast conservation, mastectomy, or possibly nipple sparing mastectomy, with upfront sentinel lymph node evaluation in the case of mastectomy. Radiation therapy is generally recommended as a component of breast conserving therapy for patients with DCIS, though in some low risk patients, there is trial data to suggest that adjuvant radiation may be omitted. Techniques for minimizing radiation toxicity should always be emphasized. Endocrine therapy is offered to women with hormone positive DCIS who have undergone lumpectomy for risk reduction, and has the benefit of decreasing incidence of events in both the ipsilateral and contralateral breast. More recent studies have explored use of targeted treatments such as trastuzumab in DCIS for HER2 overexpression. Future directions include tailoring therapy based on patient characteristics and tumor biology. With so many different options for treatment, it is also critical to engage in a discussion with the patient to arrive at a treatment decision that balances patient preferences for disease control versus treatment toxicity, financial toxicity, cosmesis, and quality of life.
导管原位癌(DCIS)的治疗方法历来是从浸润性乳腺癌的研究中推断而来。公认的局部治疗方法包括小范围局部切除(有或无放疗)以及双侧乳房切除术。对于激素阳性患者,通常建议采用内分泌治疗进行全身治疗。随着现代影像学、病理检查和治疗技术的进步,再加上有关肿瘤生物学的新信息,DCIS的管理正在迅速发展。如今,多学科治疗方法比以往任何时候都更加重要,治疗趋势正朝着降低治疗强度以减少治疗相关毒性转变。本综述重点关注现代DCIS临床管理的细微差别,突出DCIS与浸润性乳腺癌之间的关键差异。美国癌症协会(ACS)目前建议45岁及以上女性开始每年进行一次乳房X光检查,40岁及以上女性也可选择开始筛查。由于DCIS的治疗尚未显示出对生存率有影响,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)有更保守的筛查建议,即50至74岁女性每两年进行一次乳房X光检查。与浸润性乳腺癌不同,DCIS几乎完全通过乳房X光检查发现,不建议进行淋巴结评估。活检标本的病理检查应遵循美国病理学家学会的指南。手术管理选项包括保乳手术、乳房切除术,或可能的保留乳头乳房切除术,乳房切除术时可进行前哨淋巴结评估。对于DCIS患者,放疗通常被推荐作为保乳治疗的一部分,不过在一些低风险患者中,有试验数据表明可以省略辅助放疗。应始终强调尽量减少放疗毒性的技术。对于激素阳性DCIS且已接受肿块切除术的女性,可提供内分泌治疗以降低风险,其好处是可降低同侧和对侧乳房事件的发生率。最近的研究探索了在DCIS中使用曲妥珠单抗等靶向治疗用于HER2过表达的情况。未来的方向包括根据患者特征和肿瘤生物学特性定制治疗方案。由于有如此多不同的治疗选择,与患者进行讨论以做出平衡患者对疾病控制与治疗毒性、经济毒性、美容效果和生活质量偏好的治疗决策也至关重要。