Eisenring Michael, Glauser Gaetan, Meissle Michael, Romeis Jörg
Agroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.
Neuchâtel Platform of Analytical Chemistry, University of Neuchâtel, Avenue de Bellevaux 51, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
J Chem Ecol. 2018 Dec;44(12):1178-1189. doi: 10.1007/s10886-018-1015-4. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
Phytochemical defense responses of plants are often herbivore-specific and can be affected by a herbivore's feeding mode. However, comprehensive studies documenting the impact of multiple herbivores from different feeding guilds on induced phytochemical responses in distal leaves and its consequences for plant-mediated herbivore interactions are limited and findings are inconsistent. We investigated how herbivory by leaf-chewing caterpillars, cell-content feeding spider mites and phloem-feeding aphids and whiteflies affect secondary metabolomes and phytohormone levels in youngest, non-damaged cotton leaves (distal leaves). Furthermore, bioassays with caterpillars were conducted to assess their performance on distal leaves of plants infested with different herbivores. Caterpillars, and to a lesser degree spider mites, led to a systemic induction of terpenoids with negative consequences for caterpillar performance in the bioassays. Both herbivores reduced levels of various nutrients and potentially antioxidative compounds. Caterpillar damage increased levels of jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine and abscisic acid (ABA), whereas spider mite infestation had no effect on phytohormone levels. Aphid and whitefly infestation did not systemically affect secondary metabolites. Aphids decreased salicylic acid levels while whitefly-infested plants contained increased ABA levels. Neither aphid nor whitefly infestation affected caterpillar performance. In general, feeding mode of a herbivore can affect systemically induced changes in phytochemistry and plant-mediated indirect interactions even though the two phloem-feeding herbivores triggered different phytohormonal responses. The observed reduction of nutrients and potentially antioxidative compounds upon caterpillar and spider mite herbivory underlines the importance of further elucidating the role of resource sequestration as a potential systemic defensive response following herbivory by chewers and cell-content feeding herbivores.
植物的植物化学防御反应通常具有食草动物特异性,并且会受到食草动物取食方式的影响。然而,关于来自不同取食类群的多种食草动物对远端叶片诱导的植物化学响应的影响及其对植物介导的食草动物相互作用的后果的综合研究有限,且结果并不一致。我们研究了咀嚼式毛虫、取食细胞内容物的叶螨以及取食韧皮部的蚜虫和粉虱的取食如何影响最幼嫩、未受损的棉花叶片(远端叶片)中的次生代谢组和植物激素水平。此外,我们用毛虫进行了生物测定,以评估它们在被不同食草动物侵染的植物的远端叶片上的表现。毛虫,以及在较小程度上叶螨,导致萜类化合物的系统性诱导,这在生物测定中对毛虫的表现产生了负面影响。两种食草动物都降低了各种营养物质和潜在抗氧化化合物的水平。毛虫取食会增加茉莉酸 -L-异亮氨酸和脱落酸(ABA)的水平,而叶螨侵染对植物激素水平没有影响。蚜虫和粉虱侵染不会系统性地影响次生代谢产物。蚜虫会降低水杨酸水平,而被粉虱侵染的植物中ABA水平升高。蚜虫和粉虱侵染均不影响毛虫的表现。总体而言,食草动物的取食方式会影响植物化学的系统性诱导变化以及植物介导的间接相互作用,尽管两种取食韧皮部的食草动物引发了不同的植物激素反应。毛虫和叶螨取食后观察到的营养物质和潜在抗氧化化合物的减少凸显了进一步阐明资源隔离作为咀嚼式和取食细胞内容物的食草动物取食后潜在的系统性防御反应所起作用的重要性。