Nagao Kyoko, Bullard Alexa S, Pasko Lauren E, Pereira Olivia, Walter Cassidy, Hammond Mackenzie, Pellicori-Curry Jenna, Morlet Thierry
Nemours Biomedical Research, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware.
Department of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Oct;25(10):973-978. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0163. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Background and Introduction:Tablet-based automated audiometry applications are a recent alternative method to perform pure-tone hearing testing. Children, in particular, might benefit from such apps because of the game-like interface. However, how children perceive this alternative approach has not been well studied. This study examined children's preference of hearing test and a relationship between their test preference and hearing test results.
Materials and Methods:Forty children 6-12 years of age completed a pure-tone hearing test in both the tablet-based automated (tablet) method and the conventional method. Hearing thresholds were measured at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 kHz in each ear. An exit interview was conducted to obtain each child's test preference.
Results:We found that 59% of the children preferred the tablet method when compared to the conventional method. Preference to the tablet method was stronger in the younger children (6 years) than older children (7-12 years). The linear regression analyses suggest that test preference does not affect the hearing test results in the conventional method, but does negatively affect the results in the tablet method. In addition, poor performance was found among children with a clinical diagnosis, in particular, in the tablet method.
Discussion:These results suggest that hearing thresholds may be overestimated in children, especially those with clinical diagnosis such as attention or behavioral issues in the tablet method. Future work is needed to determine which clinical populations have potential benefit from a tablet method.
Conclusions:Children's test preference is not a good index of hearing test accuracy.
基于平板电脑的自动听力测定应用程序是一种用于进行纯音听力测试的新型替代方法。尤其是儿童,可能会因这种类似游戏的界面而从这类应用程序中受益。然而,儿童如何看待这种替代方法尚未得到充分研究。本研究调查了儿童对听力测试的偏好以及他们的测试偏好与听力测试结果之间的关系。
40名6至12岁的儿童分别通过基于平板电脑的自动(平板电脑)方法和传统方法完成了纯音听力测试。测量了每只耳朵在0.5、1、2、4、6和8kHz的听力阈值。进行了一次离场访谈以获取每个孩子的测试偏好。
我们发现,与传统方法相比,59%的儿童更喜欢平板电脑方法。年龄较小的儿童(6岁)比年龄较大的儿童(7至12岁)对平板电脑方法的偏好更强。线性回归分析表明,测试偏好在传统方法中不影响听力测试结果,但在平板电脑方法中会对结果产生负面影响。此外,临床诊断的儿童表现较差,尤其是在平板电脑方法中。
这些结果表明,在儿童中,尤其是在平板电脑方法中,听力阈值可能被高估,特别是对于那些有临床诊断如注意力或行为问题的儿童。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些临床人群可能从平板电脑方法中受益。
儿童的测试偏好不是听力测试准确性的良好指标。