Kwon Chan-Young, Lee Boram
Yanggu Public Health Center, Yanggu-gun, Gangwon-do, Korea.
Department of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Integr Med Res. 2018 Sep;7(3):219-230. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
is a kind of neck pain syndrome that causes neck pain and stiffness without obvious trauma in East Asian traditional medicine. We aimed to summarize and critically evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of acupressure on
We searched eight databases for studies published up to August 29, 2017. Clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of acupressure on were included. The acupressure methods of included studies were divided into proximal acupressure performed on acupuncture points located in neck and shoulder, and distal acupressure performed on acupuncture points located in other areas. Overall clinical effective rate (CER) and immediately cured rate (ICR), which means rate of the symptom totally resolved after one treatment session, were calculated as mean percentage with 95% confidence interval. All included studies were assessed for methodological quality.
Two case studies and 13 case series with 1037 participants were included, and 17 types of proximal acupuncture points and 14 types of distal acupuncture points were used. The most commonly used proximal and distal acupuncture points were GB20 and GB39, respectively. The CER in one study using both proximal and distal acupressure was 100%. The CER and ICR in studies using only proximal acupressure was 95.65% and 71.61%, respectively. The CER and ICR in studies using only distal acupressure was 99.37% and 69.08%, respectively. Eight studies performed simple acupressure technique using one acupuncture point, of which SI11, GB39, BL57, and TE3 were used. None of the studies reported adverse events.
This review suggests that acupressure may be effective on . However, it is not conclusive due to low methodological quality and low evidence level of included studies.
在东亚传统医学中,[病症名称]是一种在无明显外伤情况下导致颈部疼痛和僵硬的颈部疼痛综合征。我们旨在总结并批判性评价关于穴位按压治疗[病症名称]有效性和安全性的证据。
我们检索了八个数据库,查找截至2017年8月29日发表的研究。纳入评估穴位按压治疗[病症名称]有效性的临床研究。纳入研究的穴位按压方法分为在颈部和肩部穴位进行的近端穴位按压,以及在其他部位穴位进行的远端穴位按压。计算总体临床有效率(CER)和即刻治愈率(ICR),即一次治疗后症状完全缓解的比率,以平均百分比及95%置信区间表示。对所有纳入研究进行方法学质量评估。
纳入两项病例研究和13项病例系列研究,共1037名参与者,使用了17种近端穴位和14种远端穴位。最常用的近端和远端穴位分别是GB20和GB39。一项同时使用近端和远端穴位按压的研究中CER为100%。仅使用近端穴位按压的研究中CER和ICR分别为95.65%和71.61%。仅使用远端穴位按压的研究中CER和ICR分别为99.37%和69.08%。八项研究采用单一穴位进行简单穴位按压技术,使用的穴位有SI11、GB39、BL57和TE3。所有研究均未报告不良事件。
本综述表明穴位按压可能对[病症名称]有效。然而,由于纳入研究的方法学质量低和证据水平低,结论并不确凿。