Dunford H B, Hasinoff B B
J Inorg Biochem. 1986 Oct-Nov;28(2-3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/0162-0134(86)80090-3.
A meaningful method of comparison is suggested for saturation kinetics, typical of enzyme-catalyzed reactions, and nonsaturation kinetics, often typical of model compound reactions. True diffusion-controlled reactions do not give saturation behavior; but enzymes may need saturation behavior to attain selectivity and stereospecificity for complicated substrates or for reactions beyond the complexity of electron transfer. However, the diffusion controlled limit provides a better reference point for rate comparisons than does the rate of uncatalyzed reaction. The failure of the Stokes-Einstein equation for small substrates is documented, as are ways of circumventing the problem. Advantages and pitfalls in the use of viscosogens to test for diffusion control are delineated. Finally, the possible advantages of surface diffusion for an enzyme, but lack of experimental evidence, is discussed.
针对饱和动力学(典型的酶催化反应)和非饱和动力学(通常是模型化合物反应的典型特征),提出了一种有意义的比较方法。真正的扩散控制反应不会呈现饱和行为;但酶可能需要饱和行为来实现对复杂底物或超出电子转移复杂性的反应的选择性和立体特异性。然而,与未催化反应的速率相比,扩散控制极限为速率比较提供了更好的参考点。记录了斯托克斯 - 爱因斯坦方程对小分子底物不适用的情况,以及规避该问题的方法。阐述了使用增粘剂测试扩散控制的优点和陷阱。最后,讨论了表面扩散对酶可能具有的优势,但缺乏实验证据。