Blacksell Stuart D, Kingston Hugh W F, Tanganuchitcharnchai Ampai, Phanichkrivalkosil Meghna, Hossain Mosharraf, Hossain Amir, Ghose Aniruddha, Leopold Stije J, Dondorp Arjen M, Day Nicholas P J, Paris Daniel H
Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajvithee Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7FZ, UK.
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 1;3(3):95. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3030095.
Here we estimated the accuracy of the InBios Scrub Typhus Detect™ immunoglobulin M (IgM) ELISA to determine the optimal optical density (OD) cut-off values for the diagnosis of scrub typhus. Patients with undifferentiated febrile illness from Chittagong, Bangladesh, provided samples for reference testing using (i) qPCR using the spp. 47-kDa gene, (ii) IFA ≥1:3200 on admission, (iii) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) ≥1:3200 on admission or 4-fold rise to ≥3200, and (iv) combination of PCR and IFA positivity. For sero-epidemiological purposes (ELISA vs. IFA ≥1:3200 on admission or 4-fold rise to ≥3200), the OD cut-off for admission samples was ≥1.25, resulting in a sensitivity (Sn) of 91.5 (95% confidence interval (95% CI: 96.8⁻82.5) and a specificity (Sp) of 92.4 (95% CI: 95.0⁻89.0), while for convalescent samples the OD cut-off was ≥1.50 with Sn of 66.0 (95% CI: 78.5⁻51.7) and Sp of 96.0 (95% CI: 98.3⁻92.3). Comparisons against comparator reference tests (ELISA vs. all tests including PCR) indicated the most appropriate cut-off OD to be within the range of 0.75⁻1.25. For admission samples, the best Sn/Sp compromise was at 1.25 OD (Sn 91.5%, Sp 92.4%) and for convalescent samples at 0.75 OD (Sn 69.8%, Sp 89.5%). A relatively high (stringent) diagnostic cut-off value provides increased diagnostic accuracy with high sensitivity and specificity in the majority of cases, while lowering the cut-off runs the risk of false positivity. This study underlines the need for regional assessment of new diagnostic tests according to the level of endemicity of the disease given the high levels of residual or cross-reacting antibodies in the general population.
在此,我们评估了InBios恙虫病检测™免疫球蛋白M(IgM)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的准确性,以确定用于恙虫病诊断的最佳光密度(OD)临界值。来自孟加拉国吉大港的不明原因发热患者提供了样本,用于参考检测,检测方法包括:(i)使用恙虫病东方体47-kDa基因进行定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR);(ii)入院时间接免疫荧光法(IFA)≥1:3200;(iii)入院时IFA≥1:3200或4倍升高至≥3200;以及(iv)PCR和IFA均呈阳性。出于血清流行病学目的(ELISA与入院时IFA≥1:3200或4倍升高至≥3200进行比较),入院样本的OD临界值为≥1.25,灵敏度(Sn)为91.5(95%置信区间(95%CI:96.8⁻82.5)),特异性(Sp)为92.4(95%CI:95.0⁻89.0),而恢复期样本的OD临界值为≥1.50,Sn为66.0(95%CI:78.5⁻51.7),Sp为96.0(95%CI:98.3⁻92.3)。与对照参考检测进行比较(ELISA与包括PCR在内的所有检测进行比较)表明,最合适的临界OD值在0.75⁻1.25范围内。对于入院样本,最佳的Sn/Sp折衷值在OD为1.25时(Sn 91.5%,Sp 92.4%),对于恢复期样本,最佳值在OD为0.75时(Sn 69.8%,Sp 89.5%)。相对较高(严格)的诊断临界值在大多数情况下可提高诊断准确性,并具有高灵敏度和特异性,而降低临界值则有假阳性的风险。鉴于普通人群中存在高水平的残留或交叉反应抗体,本研究强调了根据疾病的流行程度对新诊断检测进行区域评估的必要性。