Jachowski David S, Kauffman Matthew J, Jesmer Brett R, Sawyer Hall, Millspaugh Joshua J
Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville, South Africa.
Conserv Physiol. 2018 Sep 28;6(1):coy054. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coy054. eCollection 2018.
Rapid climate and human land-use change may limit the ability of long-distance migratory herbivores to optimally track or 'surf' high-quality forage during spring green-up. Understanding how anthropogenic and environmental stressors influence migratory movements is of critical importance because of their potential to cause a mismatch between the timing of animal movements and the emergence of high-quality forage. We measured stress hormones (fecal glucocorticoid metabolites; FGMs) to test hypotheses about the effects of high-quality forage tracking, human land-use and use of stopover sites on the physiological state of individuals along a migratory route. We collected and analysed FGM concentrations from 399 mule deer () samples obtained along a 241-km migratory route in western Wyoming, USA, during spring 2015 and 2016. In support of a fitness benefit hypothesis, individuals occupying areas closer to peak forage quality had decreased FGM levels. Specifically, for every 10-day interval closer to peak forage quality, we observed a 7% decrease in FGMs. Additionally, we observed support for both an additive anthropogenic stress hypothesis and a hypothesis that stopovers act as physiological refugia, wherein individuals sampled far from stopover sites exhibited 341% higher FGM levels if in areas of low landscape integrity compared to areas of high landscape integrity. Overall, our findings indicate that the physiological state of mule deer during migration is influenced by both anthropogenic disturbances and their ability to track high-quality forage. The availability of stopovers, however, modulates physiological responses to those stressors. Thus, our results support a recent call for the prioritization of stopover locations and connectivity between those locations in conservation planning for migratory large herbivores.
快速的气候和人类土地利用变化可能会限制长途迁徙食草动物在春季植被返青期间最佳追踪或“追逐”优质草料的能力。了解人为和环境压力源如何影响迁徙活动至关重要,因为它们可能导致动物迁徙时间与优质草料出现时间不匹配。我们测量了应激激素(粪便糖皮质激素代谢物;FGMs),以检验关于优质草料追踪、人类土地利用和中途停留地使用对沿迁徙路线个体生理状态影响的假设。我们在2015年和2016年春季,从美国怀俄明州西部一条241公里长的迁徙路线上采集的399份骡鹿样本中收集并分析了FGM浓度。为支持适应性益处假设,占据靠近草料质量峰值区域的个体FGM水平降低。具体而言,每靠近草料质量峰值10天的间隔,我们观察到FGMs降低7%。此外,我们观察到对人为附加应激假设和中途停留地充当生理避难所假设的支持,即在低景观完整性区域与高景观完整性区域相比,远离中途停留地采样的个体FGM水平高出341%。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,骡鹿迁徙期间的生理状态受人为干扰及其追踪优质草料能力的影响。然而,中途停留地的可用性调节了对这些压力源的生理反应。因此,我们的结果支持了最近呼吁在迁徙大型食草动物保护规划中优先考虑中途停留地点及其之间的连通性。