• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价不同家用美白凝胶给药方式的遗传毒性潜力:一项单盲、随机临床试验。

Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of different delivery methods of at-home bleaching gels: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Federal University of Amazonas, R Ministro Waldemar Pedrosa, n. 1539, Praça 14 de Janeiro, Manaus, AM, 69025-050, Brazil.

Restorative Dentistry, Ponta Grossa State University, Av. General Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, Ponta Grossa, PR, 84030-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2199-2206. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2659-8. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-018-2659-8
PMID:30280324
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial evaluated the genotoxic potential and effectiveness of 10% hydrogen peroxide (HP) in patients submitted to at-home bleaching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty young volunteers with maxillary incisors equal to or darker than M1.5 were included in the study. Patients were submitted to bleaching for 14 days (30 min/day) with one of the three 10% HP treatments: the bleaching agent was delivered in a bleaching tray (White Class, FGM), whitening strips (White Strips, Oral-b), or in prefilled disposable trays (Opalescence Go, Ultradent). The color change was evaluated with the Vita Bleachedguide, and the micronucleus test of exfoliative oral mucosa was carried out, starting from a count of 1000 cells, at the baseline, immediately after and 30 days after the end of the treatment. The micronucleus data were evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests and color change with the two-way ANOVA test and the Tukey test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Significant whitening was observed for all groups after 14 days (p = 0.001) and was maintained after 30 days, with no difference between groups (p = 0.42). The micronucleus count did not indicate genotoxic potential in any of the groups studied (p = 0.32), irrespective of the time intervals (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

No genotoxic effects of 10% HP were observed in patients submitted to at-home bleaching systems (30 min/day for 14 days), even 30 days after the end of treatment.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

It is safe to use different systems to deliver 10% HP during at-home bleaching according to the manufacturers' recommendations, with no risk of genotoxic effects applied.

摘要

目的

本单盲、平行、随机临床试验评估了 10%过氧化氢(HP)在家用漂白中对患者的遗传毒性潜力和效果。

材料和方法

共有 60 名上颌切牙与 M1.5 等深或更暗的年轻志愿者纳入研究。患者接受三种 10%HP 治疗中的一种,持续 14 天(每天 30 分钟)进行漂白:漂白剂在漂白托盘(FGM 的 White Class)、美白条(Oral-b 的 White Strips)或预填充一次性托盘(Ultradent 的 Opalescence Go)中输送。使用 Vita Bleachedguide 评估颜色变化,在基线、治疗结束后即刻和 30 天后,从 1000 个细胞开始进行脱落口腔黏膜微核试验。微核数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Wilcoxon 检验进行评估,颜色变化采用双向方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)。

结果

所有组在 14 天后均观察到显著的美白效果(p=0.001),并且在 30 天后保持不变,各组之间无差异(p=0.42)。无论时间间隔如何(p=0.62),研究组的微核计数均未表明遗传毒性潜力(p=0.32)。

结论

在家用漂白系统(每天 30 分钟,持续 14 天)中,即使在治疗结束后 30 天,使用 10%HP 也未观察到遗传毒性作用。

临床意义

根据制造商的建议,在家用漂白中使用不同的系统输送 10%HP 是安全的,不会产生遗传毒性作用。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of different delivery methods of at-home bleaching gels: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial.评价不同家用美白凝胶给药方式的遗传毒性潜力:一项单盲、随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2199-2206. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2659-8. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
2
Clinical Evaluation of Different Delivery Methods of At-Home Bleaching Gels Composed of 10% Hydrogen Peroxide.含10%过氧化氢的家用漂白凝胶不同给药方法的临床评估
Oper Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;44(1):13-23. doi: 10.2341/17-174-C. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
3
Clinical comparative study of the effectiveness of and tooth sensitivity to 10% and 20% carbamide peroxide home-use and 35% and 38% hydrogen peroxide in-office bleaching materials containing desensitizing agents.含脱敏剂的 10%和 20%过氧化脲家用及 35%和 38%过氧化氢诊室美白材料的有效性和牙齿敏感性的临床对比研究。
Oper Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):464-73. doi: 10.2341/11-337-C. Epub 2012 May 18.
4
Effectiveness of and Dental Sensitivity to At-home Bleaching With 4% and 10% Hydrogen Peroxide: A Randomized, Triple-blind Clinical Trial.4%和10%过氧化氢家庭美白的效果及牙齿敏感性:一项随机、三盲临床试验
Oper Dent. 2018 May/Jun;43(3):232-240. doi: 10.2341/16-260-C.
5
Efficacy of Home-use Bleaching Agents Delivered in Customized or Prefilled Disposable Trays: A Randomized Clinical Trial.定制或预填充一次性托盘提供的家用漂白剂的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):30-40. doi: 10.2341/15-315-C. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
6
Clinical Effects of Desensitizing Prefilled Disposable Trays in In-office Bleaching: A Randomized Single-blind Clinical Trial.诊室用脱敏预灌型托盘在牙齿漂白中的临床效果:一项随机单盲临床试验。
Oper Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):E1-E10. doi: 10.2341/18-149-C.
7
Clinical Evaluation of 10% Hydrogen Peroxide on Tooth Sensitivity and Effectiveness in at Home Dental Bleaching.10%过氧化氢对牙齿敏感性及家庭牙齿美白效果的临床评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1376-1380.
8
Effect of acidity of in-office bleaching gels on tooth sensitivity and whitening: a two-center double-blind randomized clinical trial.诊室用漂白凝胶酸度对牙齿敏感和美白效果的影响:一项双中心、双盲、随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Dec;21(9):2811-2818. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2083-5. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
Evaluation of At-home Bleaching Times on Effectiveness and Sensitivity with 10% Hydrogen Peroxide: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Clinical Trial.评价 10%过氧化氢家用漂白剂的有效性和敏感性的时间:一项随机对照双盲临床试验。
Oper Dent. 2021 Jul 1;46(4):385-394. doi: 10.2341/20-104-C.
10
Tooth sensitivity with a desensitizing-containing at-home bleaching gel-a randomized triple-blind clinical trial.含脱敏剂的家庭用美白凝胶治疗牙本质敏感症的随机、三盲、临床研究。
J Dent. 2018 May;72:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Genotoxic Effects of Ageing Dental Restorations and Micronuclei in Oral Mucosal Cells.老化牙科修复体的遗传毒性效应与口腔黏膜细胞微核之间的关联。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 28;61(8):1363. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081363.
2
Assessment of color changes and adverse effects of over-the-counter bleaching protocols: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.评估非处方漂白方案的颜色变化和不良反应:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 2;28(3):189. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05595-5.
3
Effect of incorporation of calcium polyphosphate sub-microparticles in low-concentration bleaching gels on physical properties of dental enamel.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of Different Delivery Methods of At-Home Bleaching Gels Composed of 10% Hydrogen Peroxide.含10%过氧化氢的家用漂白凝胶不同给药方法的临床评估
Oper Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;44(1):13-23. doi: 10.2341/17-174-C. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
2
Controlled clinical trial addressing teeth whitening with hydrogen peroxide in adolescents: a 12-month follow-up.针对青少年使用过氧化氢进行牙齿美白的对照临床试验:12个月随访
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Mar;72(3):161-170. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(03)06.
3
Policy on the Use of Dental Bleaching for Child and Adolescent Patients.
在低浓度漂白凝胶中加入钙多聚磷酸盐亚微米颗粒对牙釉物理性能的影响。
Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):729-738. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00875-0. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of whitening toothpastes in buccal mucosal cells: a randomized controlled trial.美白牙膏对颊黏膜细胞的细胞毒性和遗传毒性:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):6245-6259. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05241-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
5
Effect of At-Home Versus Over-the-Counter Bleaching Agents on Enamel Color, Roughness, and Color Stability.家用与非处方漂白剂对牙釉质颜色、粗糙度和颜色稳定性的影响。
Cureus. 2023 May 15;15(5):e39036. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39036. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Reply to the opinion paper: is micronucleus test a suitable method for monitoring oral mucosa exposed to dental bleachings in smokers?对观点论文的回复:微核试验是否是监测吸烟者中暴露于牙齿漂白剂的口腔黏膜的合适方法?
Arch Toxicol. 2023 Jul;97(7):2031-2033. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03517-0. Epub 2023 May 25.
7
Is the at-home bleaching treatment applied only on the lingual surface as effective as that on the buccal surface? A randomized clinical trial.家庭漂白治疗仅应用于舌侧表面与颊侧表面同样有效吗?一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1551-1560. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04128-8. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
A Comparative Evaluation of Nanohydroxyapatite-Enriched Hydrogen Peroxide Home Bleaching System on Color, Hardness and Microstructure of Dental Enamel.纳米羟基磷灰石强化过氧化氢家庭漂白系统对牙釉质颜色、硬度和微观结构的比较评价
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;14(11):3072. doi: 10.3390/ma14113072.
9
Do dental bleaching agents induce genetic damage on oral mucosa cells?牙齿漂白剂会对口腔黏膜细胞造成基因损伤吗?
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2511-2513. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02873-5. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Do dental bleaching agents induce genetic damage on oral mucosa cells?牙齿漂白剂会对口腔黏膜细胞造成基因损伤吗?
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1997-1998. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02860-w. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
儿童和青少年患者牙齿漂白使用政策
Pediatr Dent. 2016 Oct;38(6):81-83.
4
Efficacy of Home-use Bleaching Agents Delivered in Customized or Prefilled Disposable Trays: A Randomized Clinical Trial.定制或预填充一次性托盘提供的家用漂白剂的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):30-40. doi: 10.2341/15-315-C. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
Children's perceptions of smile esthetics and their influence on social judgment.儿童对微笑美学的认知及其对社会判断的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):1050-1055. doi: 10.2319/102715-722. Epub 2016 May 19.
6
Clinical application of micronucleus test in exfoliated buccal cells: A systematic review and metanalysis.微核试验在脱落口腔细胞中的临床应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2015 Oct-Dec;766:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
Pre- and postoperative dexamethasone does not reduce bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity: A randomized, triple-masked clinical trial.术前及术后使用地塞米松不能降低漂白引起的牙齿敏感:一项随机、三盲临床试验。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jan;147(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Effectiveness of and tooth sensitivity with at-home bleaching in smokers: a multicenter clinical trial.吸烟者家庭漂白的效果及牙齿敏感性:一项多中心临床试验
J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Apr;146(4):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2014.12.014.
9
Genotoxic potential of 10% and 16% carbamide peroxide in dental bleaching.10%和16%过氧化脲在牙齿漂白中的遗传毒性潜力。
Braz Oral Res. 2015;29. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0021. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Evaluation of genotoxicity and efficacy of at-home bleaching in smokers: a single-blind controlled clinical trial.吸烟者家庭漂白术的遗传毒性与疗效评估:一项单盲对照临床试验。
Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):E47-55. doi: 10.2341/14-121-C. Epub 2014 Dec 23.