Department of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, Institute of Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, A-1190, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Energy-, Process- and Bio-Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Thermodynamics and Thermal Process Engineering, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.
J Comput Chem. 2018 Oct 5;39(26):2226-2242. doi: 10.1002/jcc.25537. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
We investigate the ability of several free-energy calculation methods to combine two alchemical changes. We use Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR), thermodynamic integration (TI), extended TI (X-TI), and enveloping distribution sampling (EDS) to perturb a water molecule, which is restrained to an amino acid that is also being perturbed. In addition to these pairwise methods, we present two two-dimensional approaches, EDS-TI and two-dimensional TI (2D-TI). We compare feasibility, efficiency and usability of these methods in regard to our simple model system, which mimics the displacement of a water molecule in the active site of a protein on residue mutation. The correct treatment of structural water has been shown to greatly aid binding affinity calculations in some cases that remained elusive otherwise. This is of broad interest in, for example, drug design, and we conclude that thus far, the pairwise method BAR and also the newer X-TI remain the most suitable methods to treat this problem as long as few end states are involved. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
我们研究了几种自由能计算方法结合两种热力学变化的能力。我们使用 Bennett 接受率(BAR)、热力学积分(TI)、扩展 TI(X-TI)和包络分布采样(EDS)来扰动一个水分子,该水分子被限制在一个氨基酸上,该氨基酸也被扰动。除了这些成对的方法,我们还提出了两种二维方法,EDS-TI 和二维 TI(2D-TI)。我们比较了这些方法在我们简单的模型系统中的可行性、效率和可用性,该模型系统模拟了蛋白质活性部位中水分子在残基突变时的位移。在某些情况下,正确处理结构水已被证明极大地有助于结合亲和力的计算,而在其他情况下则无法解决。这在药物设计等方面具有广泛的意义,我们的结论是,到目前为止,只要涉及的终态较少,成对方法 BAR 和较新的 X-TI 仍然是处理这个问题最适合的方法。 © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.