• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国胃肠病学会临床实践指南的科学依据。

Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines.

机构信息

Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0204720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204720. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0204720
PMID:30281671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6169920/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines contain recommendations for physicians to determine the most appropriate care for patients. These guidelines systematically combine scientific evidence and clinical judgment, culminating in recommendations intended to optimize patient care. The recommendations in CPGs are supported by evidence which varies in quality. We aim to survey the clinical practice guidelines created by the American College of Gastroenterology, report the level of evidence supporting their recommendations, and identify areas where evidence can be improved with additional research.

METHODS

We extracted 1328 recommendations from 39 clinical practice guidelines published by the American College of Gastroenterology. Several of the clinical practice guidelines used the differing classifications of evidence for their recommendations. To standardize our results, we devised a uniform system for evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 39 clinical practice guidelines were surveyed in our study. Together they account for 1328 recommendations. 693 (52.2%) of the recommendations were based on low evidence, indicating poor evidence or expert opinion. Among individual guidelines, 13/39 (33.3%) had no recommendations based on high evidence.

CONCLUSION

Very few recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are supported by high levels of evidence. More than half of all recommendations made by the American College of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence or expert opinion.

摘要

背景

临床实践指南包含了医生为患者确定最合适的治疗方案的建议。这些指南系统地结合了科学证据和临床判断,最终形成旨在优化患者治疗的建议。指南中的建议得到了不同质量的证据的支持。我们旨在调查美国胃肠病学会制定的临床实践指南,报告支持其建议的证据水平,并确定在哪些领域可以通过进一步研究来改进证据。

方法

我们从美国胃肠病学会发表的 39 份临床实践指南中提取了 1328 条建议。其中一些临床实践指南使用了不同的证据分类来为其建议分级。为了使我们的结果标准化,我们设计了一个统一的证据系统。

结果

我们对 39 份临床实践指南进行了调查,这些指南共包含 1328 条建议。其中 693 条(52.2%)建议的证据水平较低,表明证据质量较差或仅基于专家意见。在个别指南中,有 13/39(33.3%)的指南没有基于高证据的建议。

结论

美国胃肠病学会提出的建议中,很少有得到高证据水平的支持。超过一半的美国胃肠病学会提出的建议都是基于低质量的证据或专家意见。

相似文献

1
Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines.美国胃肠病学会临床实践指南的科学依据。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0204720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204720. eCollection 2018.
2
Systematic analysis underlying the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in interventional medicine subspecialty guidelines.介入医学亚专科指南中科学证据质量和利益冲突的系统分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Jan;89(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.09.013.
3
Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletins.美国妇产科医师学会实践通报的科学依据。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):505-512. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f43.
4
Systematic review: the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in international inflammatory bowel disease practice guidelines.系统评价:国际炎症性肠病实践指南中的科学证据质量和利益冲突。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 May;37(10):937-46. doi: 10.1111/apt.12290. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
5
Systematic analysis underlying the quality of the scientific evidence and conflicts of interest in gastroenterology practice guidelines.系统分析胃肠病学实践指南中科学证据的质量和利益冲突的基础。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1686-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.150.
6
Methodological quality of guidelines in gastroenterology.胃肠病学指南的方法学质量
Endoscopy. 2014 Jun;46(6):513-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365394. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
7
Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential.胃肠病学指南:谨慎解读至关重要。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 25;29(4):240-246. doi: 10.1159/000518322. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to portal hypertension. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee.门静脉高压继发胃肠道出血的诊断与治疗。美国胃肠病学会实践参数委员会
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jul;92(7):1081-91.
9
Strength of Evidence Underlying the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guidelines on Endovascular and Surgical Treatment of Peripheral Vascular Disease.美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会外周血管疾病血管内和手术治疗指南的证据强度。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan;12(1):e007244. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007244.
10
An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part I: introduction and general considerations.慢性脊柱疼痛介入技术的综合循证指南更新。第一部分:引言和一般考虑。
Pain Physician. 2013 Apr;16(2 Suppl):S1-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation supporting European society for medical oncology clinical practice guidelines.支持欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床实践指南的证据水平和推荐等级。
Oncol Res. 2024 Apr 23;32(5):807-815. doi: 10.32604/or.2024.048948. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021.美国糖尿病协会《糖尿病医疗护理标准(2021年)》临床实践指南中利益冲突的财务评估及证据质量
Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36567. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: Implications for research and policy.急诊医学临床实践指南的系统评价:对研究和政策的启示
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 19;12(6):e0178456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178456. eCollection 2017.
2
Relationship Between Using Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pain Treatment and Physicians' Training and Attitudes Toward Patients and the Effects on Patient Care.疼痛治疗临床实践指南的使用与医生培训、对患者的态度之间的关系及其对患者护理的影响。
Pain Pract. 2018 Jan;18(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/papr.12579. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Analysis of Research Activity in Gastroenterology: Pancreatitis Is in Real Danger.
Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential.
胃肠病学指南:谨慎解读至关重要。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 25;29(4):240-246. doi: 10.1159/000518322. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
An informatics consult approach for generating clinical evidence for treatment decisions.一种用于生成治疗决策临床证据的信息学咨询方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 12;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01638-z.
5
Over half of clinical practice guidelines use non-systematic methods to inform recommendations: A methods study.超过一半的临床实践指南使用非系统方法来为建议提供信息:一项方法研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250356. eCollection 2021.
6
Levels of evidence supporting clinical practice guidelines on invasive aspergillosis.支持侵袭性曲霉病临床实践指南的证据级别。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 May;39(5):903-913. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03794-7. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults.支持成人 HAP 和 VAP 治疗、诊断和预防国际指南推荐的证据。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;39(3):483-491. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03748-z. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Levels of Evidence Supporting American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, 2008-2018.2008-2018 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会和欧洲心脏病学会指南的证据水平。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 19;321(11):1069-1080. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1122.
胃肠病学研究活动分析:胰腺炎面临真正的危险。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0165244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165244. eCollection 2016.
4
Increasing the Impact of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.增强随机对照试验在胃肠内镜检查中的影响力。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):521-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.022. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
5
Variable agreement among experts regarding Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.专家们对鸟分枝杆菌复合群肺病的看法不一。
Respirology. 2015 Feb;20(2):348-51. doi: 10.1111/resp.12440. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
6
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis.提高研究设计、实施和分析的价值并减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):166-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.如何在设定研究重点时增加价值和减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
AASLD clinical practice guidelines: a critical review of scientific evidence and evolving recommendations.AASLD 临床实践指南:对科学证据的批判性评价和不断发展的建议。
Hepatology. 2013 Dec;58(6):2142-52. doi: 10.1002/hep.26578. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
Conflict of interest policies for organizations producing a large number of clinical practice guidelines.针对大量临床实践指南制定机构的利益冲突政策。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037413. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletins.美国妇产科医师学会实践通报的科学依据。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):505-512. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f43.