Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.
Hepatology. 2019 Mar;69(3):1231-1241. doi: 10.1002/hep.30295. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
Each year, approximately 60 children, representing 12% of waitlist candidates, die awaiting liver transplantation. The current allocation algorithm for pediatric donor livers prioritizes local/regional adults over national children. We attempted to better understand the impact of the present algorithm on pediatric candidates. We analyzed pediatric donor liver offers from 2010 to 2014. Donors and recipients were classified based on age. We mapped allocation and acceptance patterns and used subgroup analyses to explore the significance of donor service areas (DSAs) with low pediatric transplant volumes. We used Cox proportional hazard regressions to evaluate posttransplantation outcomes: 3,318 pediatric donor livers were transplanted into 3,482 recipients, and 45% (1,569) were adults. Of the 1,569 adults, 25% (390) received a pediatric organ that was never offered to children; 52% (204) of these 390 pediatric organs originated in the 37 DSAs, with ≤25 pediatric liver transplantations; 278 children died or were delisted due to illness during the same time, with higher mortality rates in the 37 DSAs (10% versus 6%, P < 0.01). Compared to adults, pediatric recipients aged <12 years had lower risks of posttransplant mortality (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.81; P < 0.01). Conclusions: We found that 45% of pediatric donor livers were transplanted into adults: 390 adults were transplanted with pediatric organs never offered to children, while 278 children died or were delisted due to illness, which was more apparent in DSAs with low pediatric transplant volumes; we advocate for a change to allocation policies to allow pediatric organs to be offered to national children with status 1B or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease >15 before being offered to local/regional + circle non-status 1A adults.
每年约有 60 名儿童(占候补名单候选人的 12%)在等待肝移植时死亡。目前儿科供肝的分配算法优先考虑本地/区域内的成人,而不是全国的儿童。我们试图更好地了解当前算法对儿科候选人的影响。我们分析了 2010 年至 2014 年的儿科供肝。根据年龄对供体和受体进行分类。我们绘制了分配和接受模式,并使用亚组分析探讨了低儿科移植量的供体服务区 (DSA) 的意义。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归来评估移植后的结果:3482 名受体接受了 3318 个儿科供肝,其中 45%(1569 个)为成人。在 1569 名成人中,25%(390 名)接受了从未提供给儿童的儿科器官;这 390 个儿科器官中有 52%(204 个)来自 37 个 DSA,这些 DSA 的儿科肝移植量≤25 个;在此期间,有 278 名儿童因疾病死亡或被除名,37 个 DSA 的死亡率更高(10%对 6%,P < 0.01)。与成人相比,年龄<12 岁的儿科受者的移植后死亡率较低(风险比,0.62;95%置信区间,0.46-0.81;P < 0.01)。结论:我们发现,45%的儿科供肝被移植给了成人:390 名成人接受了从未提供给儿童的儿科器官,而 278 名儿童因疾病死亡或被除名,这在儿科移植量较低的 DSA 中更为明显;我们主张改变分配政策,允许在向本地/区域+圆非 1A 状态 1B 或终末期肝病模型/儿科终末期肝病>15 的全国儿童提供儿科器官之前,向其提供儿科器官。