Suppr超能文献

大小重要吗?七种常规方法和四种新型循环游离细胞提取方法对不同大小 DNA 片段提取产量的比较。

Does Size Matter? Comparison of Extraction Yields for Different-Sized DNA Fragments by Seven Different Routine and Four New Circulating Cell-Free Extraction Methods.

机构信息

Virology Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Nov 27;56(12). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01061-18. Print 2018 Dec.

Abstract

An element essential for PCR detection of microbial agents in many sample types is the extraction step, designed to purify nucleic acids. Despite the importance of this step, yields have not been extensively compared across methods to determine whether the method used contributes to quantitative differences and the lack of commutability seen with existing clinical methods. This may in part explain why plasma and blood viral load assays have proven difficult to standardize. Also, studies have identified small DNA fragments of <200 bp in plasma (cell-free DNA [cfDNA]), which may include significant quantities of viral DNA. Our study evaluated extraction yields for 11 commercially available extraction methods, including 4 new methods designed to isolate cfDNA. Solutions of DNA fragments with sizes ranging from 50 to 1,500 bp were extracted, and then the eluates were tested by droplet digital PCR to determine the DNA fragment yield for each method. The results demonstrated a wide range of extraction yields across the variety of methods/instruments used, with the 50- and 100-bp fragment sizes showing especially inconsistent quantitative results and poor yields of less than 20%. Slightly higher, more consistent yields were seen with 2 of the 4 circulating cell-free extraction kits. These results demonstrate a significant need for further evaluation of nucleic acid yields across the variety of extraction platforms and highlight the poor extraction yields of small DNA fragments by existing methods. Further work is necessary to determine the impact of this inconsistency across instruments and the relevance of the low yields for smaller DNA fragments in clinical virology testing.

摘要

对于许多样本类型的微生物检测,聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的一个关键要素是提取步骤,旨在纯化核酸。尽管这一步骤非常重要,但尚未广泛比较各种方法的产量,以确定所使用的方法是否会导致定量差异,以及现有临床方法缺乏可互换性。这可能部分解释了为什么血浆和血液病毒载量检测难以标准化。此外,研究已经在血浆中发现了小于 200 bp 的小 DNA 片段(无细胞 DNA [cfDNA]),其中可能包含大量病毒 DNA。我们的研究评估了 11 种市售提取方法的提取产量,包括 4 种新设计用于分离 cfDNA 的方法。提取大小在 50 到 1500 bp 之间的 DNA 片段溶液,然后通过液滴数字 PCR 测试洗脱液,以确定每种方法的 DNA 片段产量。结果表明,各种方法/仪器的提取产量差异很大,50bp 和 100bp 片段大小的定量结果尤其不一致,产量低于 20%。4 种循环无细胞提取试剂盒中的 2 种试剂盒的产量略高且更一致。这些结果表明,需要进一步评估各种提取平台的核酸产量,突出了现有方法对小 DNA 片段提取产量低的问题。需要进一步研究来确定这种不一致性对不同仪器的影响,以及较小 DNA 片段低产量对临床病毒学检测的相关性。

相似文献

4
Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Oct;406(26):6499-512. doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-7835-3. Epub 2014 May 24.
5
Microfluidic-based solid phase extraction of cell free DNA.
Lab Chip. 2018 Nov 6;18(22):3459-3470. doi: 10.1039/c8lc00716k.
6
Extraction of Cell-Free DNA: Evaluation of Efficiency, Quantity, and Quality.
J Mol Diagn. 2024 Apr;26(4):310-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
7
Evaluation of pre-analytical factors affecting plasma DNA analysis.
Sci Rep. 2018 May 9;8(1):7375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25810-0.
8
Evaluation and statistical optimization of a method for methylated cell-free fetal DNA extraction from maternal plasma.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 May;36(5):1029-1038. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01425-w. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
10
A Comparison of Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kits: Isolation and Quantification of Cell-Free DNA in Plasma.
J Mol Diagn. 2017 Jan;19(1):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

2
Inter-laboratory variability in cytomegalovirus DNA quantification: implications for standardization and clinical monitoring.
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Jul 9;63(7):e0191124. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01911-24. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
4
Distinct fragmentation patterns of circulating viral cell-free DNA in 83,552 non-invasive prenatal testing samples.
Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2021 Sep 30;2(3):228-237. doi: 10.20517/evcna.2021.13. eCollection 2021.
5
Determination of DNA content as quality control in decellularized tissues: challenges and pitfalls.
Regen Biomater. 2024 Oct 24;11:rbae123. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbae123. eCollection 2024.
6
The impact of preanalytical variables on the analysis of cell-free DNA from blood and urine samples.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 May 9;12:1385041. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1385041. eCollection 2024.
7
Ampholytic ion-exchange magnetic beads: a promising tool for selecting short fragments in circulating cell-free DNA analysis.
Front Oncol. 2024 May 8;14:1397680. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397680. eCollection 2024.
10
Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Reliable Quantification of , , and .
Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;13(4):463. doi: 10.3390/bios13040463.

本文引用的文献

1
Liquid biopsy for lung cancer early detection.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(Suppl 7):S882-S897. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.81.
2
Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Insights and Outlook.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Mar 26;5:78. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00078. eCollection 2018.
4
Epstein-Barr virus DNA in serum as an early prognostic marker in children and adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma.
Blood Adv. 2017 Apr 24;1(11):681-684. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016002618. eCollection 2017 Apr 25.
5
A field guide for cancer diagnostics using cell-free DNA: From principles to practice and clinical applications.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2018 Mar;57(3):123-139. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22517. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Review of the clinical applications and technological advances of circulating tumor DNA in cancer monitoring.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Oct 11;13:1363-1374. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S141991. eCollection 2017.
8
Numerous uncharacterized and highly divergent microbes which colonize humans are revealed by circulating cell-free DNA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9623-9628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707009114. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA to Screen for Nasopharyngeal Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):513-522. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701717.
10
Clinical Utility of Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Testing in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Aug 1;98(5):996-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验