Suppr超能文献

评估影响血浆 DNA 分析的分析前因素。

Evaluation of pre-analytical factors affecting plasma DNA analysis.

机构信息

Center for Noninvasive Diagnostics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Integrated Cancer Genomics Division & Collaborative Sequencing Center, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 May 9;8(1):7375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25810-0.

Abstract

Pre-analytical factors can significantly affect circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis. However, there are few robust methods to rapidly assess sample quality and the impact of pre-analytical processing. To address this gap and to evaluate effects of DNA extraction methods and blood collection tubes on cfDNA yield and fragment size, we developed a multiplexed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay with 5 short and 4 long amplicons targeting single copy genomic loci. Using this assay, we compared 7 cfDNA extraction kits and found cfDNA yield and fragment size vary significantly. We also compared 3 blood collection protocols using plasma samples from 23 healthy volunteers (EDTA tubes processed within 1 hour and Cell-free DNA Blood Collection Tubes processed within 24 and 72 hours) and found no significant differences in cfDNA yield, fragment size and background noise between these protocols. In 219 clinical samples, cfDNA fragments were shorter in plasma samples processed immediately after venipuncture compared to archived samples, suggesting contribution of background DNA by lysed peripheral blood cells. In summary, we have described a multiplexed ddPCR assay to assess quality of cfDNA samples prior to downstream molecular analyses and we have evaluated potential sources of pre-analytical variation in cfDNA studies.

摘要

分析前因素会显著影响循环游离 DNA(cfDNA)分析。然而,目前几乎没有可靠的方法来快速评估样本质量和分析前处理的影响。为了弥补这一空白,并评估 DNA 提取方法和采血管对 cfDNA 产量和片段大小的影响,我们开发了一种使用 5 个短片段和 4 个长片段扩增子靶向单拷贝基因组位点的多重液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)检测方法。使用该检测方法,我们比较了 7 种 cfDNA 提取试剂盒,发现 cfDNA 产量和片段大小有显著差异。我们还比较了使用来自 23 名健康志愿者的血浆样本的 3 种采血方案(EDTA 管在 1 小时内处理和无细胞 DNA 采血管在 24 小时和 72 小时内处理),发现这些方案之间在 cfDNA 产量、片段大小和背景噪声方面没有显著差异。在 219 个临床样本中,与存档样本相比,刚从静脉穿刺中处理的血浆样本中的 cfDNA 片段更短,这表明裂解的外周血细胞中的背景 DNA 有一定的贡献。总之,我们描述了一种多重 ddPCR 检测方法,用于在下游分子分析之前评估 cfDNA 样本的质量,并且评估了 cfDNA 研究中分析前变异的潜在来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcb8/5943304/f6b65ff4eba8/41598_2018_25810_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验