Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine/Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;25(7):1592-1603. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0256-5. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
Numerous placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated the ability of ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, to induce rapid (within hours), transient antidepressant effects when administered intravenously (IV) at subanesthetic doses (0.5 mg/kg over 40 min). However, the optimal antidepressant dose remains unknown. We aimed to compare to active placebo the rapid acting antidepressant properties of a broad range of subanesthetic doses of IV ketamine among outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A range of IV ketamine doses were compared to active placebo in the treatment of adult TRD over a 3-day period following a single infusion over 40 min. This was an outpatient study conducted across six US academic sites. Outpatients were 18-70 years old with TRD, defined as failure to achieve a satisfactory response (e.g., less than 50% improvement of depression symptoms) to at least two adequate treatment courses during the current depressive episode. Following a washout period, 99 eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of the five arms in a 1:1:1:1:1 fashion: a single intravenous dose of ketamine 0.1 mg/kg (n = 18), a single dose of ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (n = 20), a single dose of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg (n = 22), a single dose of ketamine 1.0 mg/kg (n = 20), and a single dose of midazolam 0.045 mg/kg (active placebo) (n = 19). The study assessments (HAM-D-6, MADRS, SDQ, PAS, CGI-S, and CGI-I) were performed at days 0, 1, 3 (endpoint), 5, 7, 14, and 30 to assess the safety and efficacy. The overall group × time interaction effect was significant for the primary outcome measure, the HAM-D-6. In post hoc pairwise comparisons controlling for multiple comparisons, standard dose (0.5 mg/kg) and high dose (1 mg/kg) of intravenous ketamine were superior to active placebo; a low dose (0.1 mg/kg) was significant only prior to adjustment (p = 0.02, p-adj = 0.14, d = -0.82 at day 1). Most of the interaction effect was due to differences at day 1, with no significant adjusted pairwise differences at day 3. This pattern generally held for secondary outcomes. The infusions of ketamine were relatively well tolerated compared to active placebo, except for greater dissociative symptoms and transient blood pressure elevations with the higher doses. Our results suggest that there is evidence for the efficacy of the 0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg subanesthetic doses of IV ketamine and no clear or consistent evidence for clinically meaningful efficacy of lower doses of IV ketamine. Trial Registration: NCT01920555.
许多安慰剂对照研究已经证明,氯胺酮作为一种 NMDA 受体拮抗剂,在亚麻醉剂量(40 分钟内静脉注射 0.5mg/kg)时,具有快速(数小时内)、短暂的抗抑郁作用。然而,最佳的抗抑郁剂量仍不清楚。我们旨在比较广泛的亚麻醉剂量的氯胺酮静脉注射与活性安慰剂在治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)患者中的快速抗抑郁作用。在单次静脉输注 40 分钟后,为期 3 天的时间内,对 TRD 成年患者进行了一系列亚麻醉剂量的氯胺酮静脉注射与活性安慰剂的比较。这是一项在美国六个学术地点进行的门诊研究。门诊患者年龄在 18-70 岁之间,TRD 定义为在当前抑郁发作期间至少接受了两次充分治疗疗程但未达到满意的反应(例如,抑郁症状改善不到 50%)。在洗脱期后,99 名符合条件的患者以 1:1:1:1:1 的比例随机分为五组之一:单次静脉注射氯胺酮 0.1mg/kg(n=18),单次氯胺酮剂量 0.2mg/kg(n=20),单次氯胺酮剂量 0.5mg/kg(n=22),单次氯胺酮剂量 1.0mg/kg(n=20)和咪达唑仑 0.045mg/kg(活性安慰剂)(n=19)。在第 0、1、3(终点)、5、7、14 和 30 天进行 HAM-D-6、MADRS、SDQ、PAS、CGI-S 和 CGI-I 评估,以评估安全性和疗效。主要结局指标 HAM-D-6 的总体组×时间交互效应显著。在事后成对比较中,与多次比较相比,标准剂量(0.5mg/kg)和高剂量(1mg/kg)的静脉注射氯胺酮优于活性安慰剂;低剂量(0.1mg/kg)仅在调整前具有统计学意义(p=0.02,p-调整=0.14,d=-0.82,第 1 天)。大多数交互效应归因于第 1 天的差异,第 3 天无明显调整后的成对差异。这种模式通常适用于次要结局。与活性安慰剂相比,氯胺酮的输注相对耐受良好,除了较高剂量的分离症状和短暂性血压升高。我们的结果表明,亚麻醉剂量的 0.5mg/kg 和 1.0mg/kg 静脉注射氯胺酮具有疗效的证据,而较低剂量的静脉注射氯胺酮没有明确或一致的临床有意义疗效的证据。
NCT01920555。