Schultze-Lutter Frauke, Schmidt Stefanie J, Theodoridou Anastasia
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 19;9:446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00446. eCollection 2018.
Psychopathology is the scientific exploration of abnormal mental states that, for more than a century, has provided a for psychiatric disorders and guided clinical as well as scientific progress in modern psychiatry. In the wake of the immense technical advances, however, psychopathology has been increasingly marginalized by neurobiological, genetic, and neuropsychological research. This ongoing erosion of psychiatric phenomenology is further fostered by clinical casualness as well as pressured health care and research systems. The skill to precisely and carefully assess psychopathology in a qualified manner used to be a core attribute of mental health professionals, but today's curricula pay increasingly less attention to its training, thus blurring the border between pathology and variants of the "normal" further. Despite all prophecies that psychopathology was doomed, and with neurobiological parameters having yet to show their differential-diagnostic superiority and value for differential indication, psychiatric diagnosis continues to rely exclusively on psychopathology in DSM-5 and ICD-11. Their categorical systematic, however, is equally challenged, and, supported by advances in machine learning, a personalized symptom-based approach to precision psychiatry is increasingly advocated. The current paper reviews the objectives of psychopathology and the recent debate on the role of psychopathology in future precision psychiatry-from guiding neurobiological research by relating neurobiological changes to patients' experiences to giving a framework to the psychiatric encounter. It concludes that contemporary research and clinic in psychiatry do not need less but rather more differentiated psychopathologic approaches in order to develop approaches that integrate professional knowledge and patients' experience.
精神病理学是对异常心理状态的科学探索,一个多世纪以来,它为精神障碍提供了一种理解方式,并指导了现代精神病学的临床和科学进展。然而,随着巨大的技术进步,精神病理学在神经生物学、遗传学和神经心理学研究的影响下日益被边缘化。临床的随意性以及压力重重的医疗保健和研究系统进一步加剧了这种对精神病学现象学的持续侵蚀。以合格的方式精确而仔细地评估精神病理学的技能曾经是心理健康专业人员的核心属性,但如今的课程越来越不重视对其进行培训,从而进一步模糊了病理学与“正常”变体之间的界限。尽管有种种预言称精神病理学已注定要消亡,而且神经生物学参数尚未显示出其在鉴别诊断方面的优越性和鉴别指征的价值,但在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)和《国际疾病分类》(ICD)中,精神病学诊断仍然完全依赖精神病理学。然而,其分类系统同样受到挑战,并且在机器学习进展的支持下,一种基于个性化症状的精准精神病学方法越来越受到倡导。本文回顾了精神病理学的目标以及最近关于精神病理学在未来精准精神病学中作用的辩论——从通过将神经生物学变化与患者经历相关联来指导神经生物学研究,到为精神病学诊疗提供一个框架。结论是,当代精神病学研究和临床实践需要的不是更少而是更多差异化的精神病理学方法,以便开发出整合专业知识和患者体验的方法。