Tironi Marta, Charpentier Mora Simone, Cavanna Donatella, Borelli Jessica L, Bizzi Fabiola
Department of Educational Science, University of Genoa, Corso Podestà 2, 16128 Genoa, Italy.
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):1477. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111477.
Although many studies have documented associations between insecure attachment and psychopathology, attachment may not confer risk for psychopathology independently, but rather through its interaction with emotional, social, and biological factors. Understanding the variables through which attachment may lead to psychopathology is therefore important. Within this domain of research, the role of physiological factors is poorly investigated. What are the relevant domains and why, when, or for whom do they influence mental disorders relating to attachment? The current systematic review aims to answer these questions. Results reveal that physiological indices of emotional regulation play a role in explaining and/or determining the relationship between attachment and psychopathology. Specifically: (1) combined with insecure attachment, higher skin conductance level (SCL), lower cardiac slowing, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia modulation (RSA) contribute to different psychopathological indicators and behavioral/psychological dysfunctions, although the latter predicts a contradictory pattern of findings; (2) insecure-avoidant attachment is more consistently linked with stress and emotional dysregulation when combined with RSA, while anxious attachment confers risk of depressive symptoms when combined with SCL. We concluded our discussion of the results of seven studies by outlining a plan to move the field forward. We discuss the quality of the assessment, methodological limitations, and future directions, highlighting the need to extend the research to clinical samples.
尽管许多研究记录了不安全依恋与精神病理学之间的关联,但依恋可能并非独立地赋予精神病理学风险,而是通过其与情感、社会和生物学因素的相互作用来产生影响。因此,了解依恋可能导致精神病理学的变量非常重要。在这一研究领域中,生理因素的作用尚未得到充分研究。哪些是相关领域,以及它们为何、何时或对谁会影响与依恋相关的精神障碍?当前的系统评价旨在回答这些问题。结果表明,情绪调节的生理指标在解释和/或确定依恋与精神病理学之间的关系中发挥作用。具体而言:(1)与不安全依恋相结合时,较高的皮肤电导率水平(SCL)、较低的心率减速和呼吸性窦性心律不齐调节(RSA)会导致不同的精神病理学指标以及行为/心理功能障碍,尽管后者预测的结果模式相互矛盾;(2)不安全回避型依恋与RSA相结合时,更一致地与压力和情绪失调相关,而焦虑型依恋与SCL相结合时会带来抑郁症状的风险。我们通过概述推动该领域发展的计划,结束了对七项研究结果的讨论。我们讨论了评估的质量、方法学局限性和未来方向,强调了将研究扩展到临床样本的必要性。