Department of Dermatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Feb;33(2):267-276. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15267.
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from isothiazolinones has frequently been described in the literature. Following an epidemic of sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) in the 1980s, and more recently to MI, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety of the European Commission banned their use in leave-on products, while restricting that in rinse-off cosmetics. Despite a decreasing prevalence of ACD from MCI/MI and MI, cases caused by occupational exposure and non-cosmetic isothiazolinone sources are on the rise. Moreover, sensitization to newer and lesser known isothiazolinones has been reported. This paper reviews the epidemiology of contact allergy to different isothiazolinones, clinical presentation of isothiazolinone-induced ACD, most relevant sensitization sources and potential cross-reactions between isothiazolinone derivatives. It also provides an update on recent legislative measures.
接触性过敏皮炎(ACD)由异噻唑啉酮引起,在文献中经常有描述。在 20 世纪 80 年代对甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮(MCI/MI)爆发流行的致敏后,最近又对 MI 进行了研究,欧盟消费者安全科学委员会禁止其在免洗产品中使用,同时限制了在冲洗化妆品中的使用。尽管由于职业暴露和非化妆品异噻唑啉酮来源引起的 MCI/MI 和 MI 的 ACD 患病率有所下降,但仍呈上升趋势。此外,据报道,对更新和不太知名的异噻唑啉酮的致敏也有所增加。本文综述了不同异噻唑啉酮的接触过敏的流行病学、异噻唑啉酮诱导的 ACD 的临床表现、最相关的致敏源以及异噻唑啉酮衍生物之间的潜在交叉反应。还提供了最新立法措施的最新情况。